Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 11, 454-460, Copyright © 1993 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Adjuvant randomized trials of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide versus doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/tamoxifen and CMF chemotherapy versus tamoxifen in women with node-positive breast cancer
M Kaufmann, W Jonat, U Abel, J Hilfrich, H Caffier, R Kreienberg, G Trams, K Brunnert, J Schermann and W Kleine
Gynecological Adjuvant Breast Group, Germany.
PURPOSE: We report two randomized trials of adjuvant systemic therapy in
747 patients < or = 65 years of age with histologically proven node-
positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were selected for
the two trials on the basis of lymph node and hormone receptor status. The
only stratification was based on the treating institution. In patients with
a lower probability of recurrence (n = 276), a comparison between endocrine
therapy (tamoxifen [Tam] 30 mg/d for 2 years) and chemotherapy
(cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil [CMF] intravenously [IV],
six cycles every 4 weeks) was performed. In patients with a higher risk of
recurrence (n = 471), a comparison between chemotherapy alone (doxorubicin
plus cyclophosphamide [AC] i.v., eight cycles every 3 weeks) and the same
chemotherapy plus Tam was made. RESULTS: Overall, we found that CMF and Tam
are equally effective in a subgroup of patients with a relatively good
prognosis (low-risk patients). However, in the subset of women < or = 49
years old, a significantly greater disease-free survival (DFS) rate (P =
.01) and overall survival (OS) rate (P = .002) was observed following
therapy with CMF compared with Tam. In patients > or = 50 years old, the
opposite was found, and Tam appeared to be superior to CMF (DFS, P = .003;
OSm P = .5). These results must be interpreted cautiously, since a post-hoc
stratification of patients by age (< or = 49, > or = 50) was
performed, and significantly more younger, low-risk patients were
randomized to receive chemotherapy alone and more older patients to receive
Tam alone. Among patients with a relatively poor prognosis (high-risk
patients), a combination of AC plus Tam was equivalent to AC and, when
women were analyzed by age, this was found to be true of patients < or =
49 years as well. However, the addition of Tam to AC in women age > or
50 years resulted in a statistically significantly higher DFS (P = .01) and
a trend toward better OS compared with women who received AC alone.
CONCLUSION: Further trials are required to analyze the role of combined
simultaneous or sequential chemoendocrine adjuvant treatment or each single
therapy alone in defined risk-adapted subsets of node-negative and
node-positive patients.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Lohrisch, C. Paltiel, K. Gelmon, C. Speers, S. Taylor, J. Barnett, and I. A. Olivotto
Impact on Survival of Time From Definitive Surgery to Initiation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 20, 2006;
24(30):
4888 - 4894.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Dellapasqua, M. Colleoni, R. D. Gelber, and A. Goldhirsch
Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Premenopausal Women With Early Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 10, 2005;
23(8):
1736 - 1750.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Recht, S. B. Edge, L. J. Solin, D. S. Robinson, A. Estabrook, R. E. Fine, G. F. Fleming, S. Formenti, C. Hudis, J. J. Kirshner, et al.
Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 1, 2001;
19(5):
1539 - 1569.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Katz, E. A. Strom, T. A. Buchholz, H. D. Thames, C. D. Smith, A. Jhingran, G. Hortobagyi, A. U. Buzdar, R. Theriault, S. E. Singletary, et al.
Locoregional Recurrence Patterns After Mastectomy and Doxorubicin-Based Chemotherapy: Implications for Postoperative Irradiation
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 15, 2000;
18(15):
2817 - 2827.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Boccardo, A. Rubagotti, D. Amoroso, M. Mesiti, D. Romeo, P. Sismondi, M. Giai, F. Genta, P. Pacini, V. Distante, et al.
Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil Versus Tamoxifen Plus Ovarian Suppression as Adjuvant Treatment of Estrogen Receptor-Positive Pre-/Perimenopausal Breast Cancer Patients: Results of the Italian Breast Cancer Adjuvant Study Group 02 Randomized Trial
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 14, 2000;
18(14):
2718 - 2727.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Recht, R. Gray, N. E. Davidson, B. L. Fowble, L. J. Solin, F. J. Cummings, G. Falkson, H. C. Falkson, S. G. Taylor IV, and D. C. Tormey
Locoregional Failure 10 Years After Mastectomy and Adjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without Tamoxifen Without Irradiation: Experience of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 1, 1999;
17(6):
1689 - 1689.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. K. Osborne
Tamoxifen in the Treatment of Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med.,
November 26, 1998;
339(22):
1609 - 1618.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Hudis and L. Norton
Adjuvant Drug Treatment for Resectable Breast Cancer
Oncologist,
December 1, 1997;
2(6):
351 - 358.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|