Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 12, 2060-2065, Copyright © 1994 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Randomized trial of vitamin A versus observation as adjuvant therapy in high-risk primary malignant melanoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study
FL Meyskens Jr, PY Liu, RJ Tuthill, VK Sondak, WS Fletcher, WR Jewell, W Samlowski, SP Balcerzak, DJ Rector and RD Noyes
University of California, Irvine, Orange.
PURPOSE: A national cooperative group trial was conducted in patients with
early-stage cutaneous malignant melanoma to determine if oral vitamin A can
increase disease-free survival or survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two
hundred forty-eight patients with completely resected melanoma of Breslow's
thickness greater than 0.75 mm and clinically negative lymph nodes were
randomized to oral vitamin A (100,000 IU/d) for 18 months or to
observation. Patients were stratified by Breslow's thickness of primary
lesion (0.76 to 1.50 mm, 1.51 to 3.00 mm, or > 3.00 mm), sex, and type
of therapy (excision, excision plus node dissection, excision plus
perfusion, or excision plus both). The median duration of follow-up
observation of living patients is greater than 8 years. The relative risk
(RR) in disease-free survival and overall survival in the treatment
compared with the observation group was calculated using Cox proportional
hazards models. RESULTS: Overall, there was no difference in disease-free
survival or overall survival between the two groups. Examination of
treatment by stratification interactions and subset analysis did not show
any treatment-effect differences based on sex or type of therapy. There was
also no difference between groups in disease-free survival based on
Breslow's thickness of the primary lesion. Overall, 12% of patients who
received vitamin A experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicities. CONCLUSION: Based
on the lack of overall survival benefit, further evaluation of vitamin A as
adjuvant therapy for melanoma does not appear warranted.