Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Basser, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Green, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Basser, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Green, M. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 12, 1659-1666, Copyright © 1994 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

Comparative study of the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of high-dose epirubicin with or without dexrazoxane in patients with advanced malignancy

RL Basser, MM Sobol, G Duggan, J Cebon, MA Rosenthal, G Mihaly and MD Green
Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria Australia.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the toxicity and pharmacokinetics of the combination of dexrazoxane with epirubicin at dexrazoxane/epirubicin dose ratios of 5 to 9:1 in a controlled, crossover phase I study in patients with advanced malignancy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with a variety of malignancies were enrolled. Assessable patients received two cycles of chemotherapy consisting of epirubicin alone and in combination with dexrazoxane. Comparisons were made between the toxicity and pharmacokinetics of epirubicin in the two treatment arms, using each patient as his or her own control. Dexrazoxane and epirubicin were delivered at dose levels of 600/120 mg/m2, 900/120 mg/m2, 900/135 mg/m2, 900/150 mg/m2, and 1,200/135 mg/m2, respectively. Twenty-six patients completed two cycles of chemotherapy and were therefore assessable. RESULTS: The maximum- tolerated doses (MTDs) of dexrazoxane/epirubicin were 1,200/135 mg/m2, with the dose-limiting toxicities being neutropenia, infection, and stomatitis. There was no difference in the nadir neutrophil or platelet counts between single-agent and combination treatment at any of the dose levels. Severe vomiting and stomatitis occurred less frequently following administration of epirubicin and dexrazoxane when compared with epirubicin alone (P = .01 and .02, respectively). Prior administration of higher doses (900 mg/m2 and 1,200 mg/m2) of dexrazoxane increased the systemic clearance of epirubicin, resulting in a decrease in the area under the curve (AUC). Elimination half-life, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), and apparent volume of distribution of epirubicin were not significantly affected by dexrazoxane. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decreased by greater than 10% in two patients, but neither developed clinical or radiologic evidence of cardiac failure. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that dexrazoxane can be safely combined with escalating doses of epirubicin at dose ratios of 5 to 9:1 without having an adverse impact on toxicity. Studies are need to determine the optimal dose ratio for cardioprotection and to explore further the pharmacokinetic interactions of the two drugs at increasing doses of epirubicin supported by hematopoietic growth factors.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
L. M. Schuchter, M. L. Hensley, N. J. Meropol, and E. P. Winer
2002 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy Protectants: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
J. Clin. Oncol., June 15, 2002; 20(12): 2895 - 2903.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. L. Hensley, L. M. Schuchter, C. Lindley, N. J. Meropol, G. I. Cohen, G. Broder, W. J. Gradishar, D. M. Green, R. J. Langdon Jr, R. B. Mitchell, et al.
American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy Protectants
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 1999; 17(10): 3333 - 3355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
V. Valero, A. U. Buzdar, R. L. Theriault, N. Azarnia, G. A. Fonseca, J. Willey, M. Ewer, R. S. Walters, B. Mackay, D. Podoloff, et al.
Phase II Trial of Liposome-Encapsulated Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, and Fluorouracil as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 1999; 17(5): 1425 - 1425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online