Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ozer, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ozer, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 12, 1783-1788, Copyright © 1994 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

Effect of a National Cancer Institute Clinical Alert on breast cancer practice patterns

TP Johnson, L Ford, RB Warnecke, SG Nayfield, A Kaluzny, G Cutter, D Gillings, E Sondik and H Ozer
Survey Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Chicago 60607.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the effect of the 1988 National Cancer Institute Clinical Alert regarding treatment of early-stage breast cancer on the patterns of treatment provided to patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data analyzed were collected from the hospital and outpatient records of 12,534 female patients with a primary diagnosis of breast cancer (stages I and II) initially diagnosed during the years 1983 through 1989. RESULTS: Analyses revealed that the proportions of patients with a negative lymph node status diagnosed after the May 1988 Clinical Alert who received adjuvant treatment (tamoxifen and/or multidrug chemotherapy) were significantly greater than predicted from treatment trends established before the Alert's release. Proportions of patients with positive lymph node status receiving adjuvant therapy subsequent to the Alert's release, in contrast, did not fall outside the projected confidence intervals for that group. Additional analyses showed a significant effect of the Clinical Alert among several subgroups of node-negative patients. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that the Clinical Alert mechanism, followed by publication in the peer- reviewed scientific literature, is an effective way to communicate important research findings to practitioners in the community. However, the Alert mechanism is controversial and should be used judiciously to ensure its credibility.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
E. J. Feuer
Chapter 1: Modeling the Impact of Adjuvant Therapy and Screening Mammography on U.S. Breast Cancer Mortality Between 1975 and 2000: Introduction to the Problem
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 2 - 6.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
N. Hebert-Croteau, J. Brisson, J. Latreille, M. Rivard, N. Abdelaziz, and G. Martin
Compliance With Consensus Recommendations for Systemic Therapy Is Associated With Improved Survival of Women With Node-Negative Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., September 15, 2004; 22(18): 3685 - 3693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. Mariotto, E. J. Feuer, L. C. Harlan, L.-M. Wun, K. A. Johnson, and J. Abrams
Trends in Use of Adjuvant Multi-Agent Chemotherapy and Tamoxifen for Breast Cancer in the United States: 1975-1999
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 6, 2002; 94(21): 1626 - 1634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. L. Malin, M. A. Schuster, K. A. Kahn, and R. H. Brook
Quality of Breast Cancer Care: What Do We Know?
J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2002; 20(21): 4381 - 4393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. C. Harlan, J. Abrams, J. L. Warren, L. Clegg, J. Stevens, and R. Ballard-Barbash
Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: Practice Patterns of Community Physicians
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2002; 20(7): 1809 - 1817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. S. Abrams
Tamoxifen: Five Versus Ten Years--Is the End in Sight?
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 2, 2001; 93(9): 662 - 664.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. E. Hillner, T. J. Smith, and C. E. Desch
Hospital and Physician Volume or Specialization and Outcomes in Cancer Treatment: Importance in Quality of Cancer Care
J. Clin. Oncol., June 11, 2000; 18(11): 2327 - 2340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online