Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Carbone, P. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Carbone, P. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 12, 1796-1805, Copyright © 1994 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

Fundamental dilemmas of the randomized clinical trial process: results of a survey of the 1,737 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group investigators

KM Taylor, ML Feldstein, RT Skeel, KJ Pandya, P Ng and PP Carbone
York University, Department of Administrative Studies, Atkinson College, Ontario, Canada.

PURPOSE: We studied oncologists' attitudes and behavior with regard to their participation in randomized clinical trials. METHODS: We surveyed the 1,737 physician members of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) using the Physician Orientation Profile (POP), a self- administered mailed questionnaire. A response rate of 86% was achieved (1,485 of 1,737); each physician's actual patient accrual was recorded. RESULTS: All respondents indicated that they had a systematic pattern of patient preselection for entry onto trials beyond the formal inclusion/exclusion trial criteria. Eighty-nine percent stated that improving patient quality of life rather than prolonging survival was more personally satisfying. Sixty-two percent did not enter a single patient during the 12-month period following the survey, while 10% entered 80% of all patients during that time. Physicians overestimated their accrual rate by a factor of 6. Eighty-three percent defined randomization and adherence to trial protocol as a serious challenge to their ability to make individualized treatment decisions. CONCLUSION: This study raises questions regarding the following: (1) the perceived generalizability of trial findings, (2) the role of end points other than survival for clinical trials, (3) the consequences of physician overestimation of patient accrual, and (4) the impact of randomized trials on the behavior of clinicians. Further investigation into these critical issues will provide meaningful recommendations to enhance the future design, implementation, and conduct of randomized clinical trials in cancer.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Oncol PractHome page
R. L. Comis, J. D. Miller, D. D. Colaizzi, and L. G. Kimmel
Physician-Related Factors Involved in Patient Decisions to Enroll Onto Cancer Clinical Trials
J. Oncol. Pract, March 1, 2009; 5(2): 50 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
T. K. Owonikoko, C. C. Ragin, C. P. Belani, A. B. Oton, W. E. Gooding, E. Taioli, and S. S. Ramalingam
Lung Cancer in Elderly Patients: An Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database
J. Clin. Oncol., December 10, 2007; 25(35): 5570 - 5577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
H. Gulbas, H. S. Erkal, and M. Serin
The Use of Recursive Partitioning Analysis Grouping in Patients with Brain Metastases from Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2006; 36(4): 193 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
P. Harter, A. du Bois, C. Schade-Brittinger, A. Burges, K. Wollschlaeger, M. Gropp, B. Schmalfeldt, J. Huober, A. Staehle, J. Pfisterer, et al.
Non-enrolment of ovarian cancer patients in clinical trials: reasons and background
Ann. Onc., November 1, 2005; 16(11): 1801 - 1805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. M. Kemeny, B. L. Peterson, A. B. Kornblith, H. B. Muss, J. Wheeler, E. Levine, N. Bartlett, G. Fleming, and H. J. Cohen
Barriers to Clinical Trial Participation by Older Women With Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., June 15, 2003; 21(12): 2268 - 2275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
G. I. Cohen
Clinical Research by Community Oncologists
CA Cancer J Clin, March 1, 2003; 53(2): 73 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. Joffe and J. C. Weeks
Views of American Oncologists About the Purposes of Clinical Trials
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 18, 2002; 94(24): 1847 - 1853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. I. Neugut, A. T. Fleischauer, V. Sundararajan, N. Mitra, D. F. Heitjan, J. S. Jacobson, and V. R. Grann
Use of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy for Rectal Cancer Among the Elderly: A Population-Based Study
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2002; 20(11): 2643 - 2650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Geriatr Psychiatry NeurolHome page
J. H. T. Karlawish and D. Casarett
Addressing the Ethical Challenges of Clinical Trials That Involve Patients with Dementia
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, December 1, 2001; 14(4): 222 - 228.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. Joffe, E. F. Cook, P. D. Cleary, J. W. Clark, and J. C. Weeks
Quality of Informed Consent: a New Measure of Understanding Among Research Subjects
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 17, 2001; 93(2): 139 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. K. Daugherty
Impact of Therapeutic Research on Informed Consent and the Ethics of Clinical Trials: A Medical Oncology Perspective
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 1999; 17(5): 1601 - 1601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online