Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ayash, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Antman, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ayash, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Antman, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 14, 2984-2992, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

Double dose-intensive chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell support for metastatic breast cancer: no improvement in progression-free survival by the sequence of high-dose melphalan followed by cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin

LJ Ayash, A Elias, G Schwartz, C Wheeler, J Ibrahim, BA Teicher, E Reich, D Warren, C Lynch, P Richardson, L Schnipper, E Frei 3rd and K Antman
Department of Cancer Pharmacology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

PURPOSE: Twenty-one percent of responding metastatic breast cancer patients remain progression-free a median 50 months following one intensification cycle of cyclophosphamide (6,000 mg/m2), thiotepa (500 mg/ m2), and carboplatin (800 mg/m2) (CTCb) with autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT). This trial studied whether the sequence of high- dose melphalan followed by CTCb resulted in improved disease response and duration. METHODS: Women with at least partial responses (PRS) to induction received melphalan (140 or 180 mg/ m2) with peripheral-blood progenitor cell (PBPC) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G- CSF) support. They were monitored as outpatients. After recovery, patients were hospitalized for CTCb with marrow, PBPC, and G-CSF support. RESULTS: Data on 67 women, at a median of 25 months from CTCb, were examined. After melphalan, 49 (73%) required admission for fever (89%), mucositis (35%), or infection (15%) (median stay, 8 days). All received CTCb. For the first 33 patients, the median days from start of melphalan to CTCb was 24. After liver toxicity (one death from venoocclusive disease [VOD]) developed in 11 patients during CTCb, the interval between intensifications was increased to 35 days without incident. Twenty-three patients (34%) are progression-free a median of 16 months post-CTCb. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and survival times for the whole group are estimated at 11 and 20 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatment with this sequence of high-dose melphalan followed by CTCb has not resulted in superior PFS to date, when compared with single-intensification CTCb. This report discusses factors related to patient selection, the role of induced drug resistance, and the schedule of administration of alkylating agenting that may adversely influence outcome.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
N. Kroger, M. Frick, O. Gluz, S. Mohrmann, B. Metzner, C. Jackisch, Y. Ko, H.-W. Lindemann, C. R. Meier, H. P. Lohrmann, et al.
Randomized Trial of Single Compared With Tandem High-Dose Chemotherapy Followed by Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Patients With Chemotherapy-Sensitive Metastatic Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2006; 24(24): 3919 - 3926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. A. Kamen, E. Rubin, J. Aisner, and E. Glatstein
High-Time Chemotherapy or High Time for Low Dose
J. Clin. Oncol., August 16, 2000; 18(16): 2935 - 2937.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. A. Grupp, J. W. Stern, N. Bunin, C. Nancarrow, A. A. Ross, M. Mogul, R. Adams, H. E. Grier, J. B. Gorlin, R. Shamberger, et al.
Tandem High-Dose Therapy in Rapid Sequence for Children With High-Risk Neuroblastoma
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2000; 18(13): 2567 - 2575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
W. W. Hu, G. D. Long, K. E. Stockerl-Goldstein, L. J. Johnston, N. J. Chao, R. S. Negrin, and K. G. Blume
A Feasibility Study of Multiple Cycle Therapy with Melphalan, Thiotepa, and Paclitaxel followed by Mitoxantrone, Thiotepa, and Paclitaxel with Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Support for Metastatic Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 1999; 5(11): 3411 - 3418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online