Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ashley, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Longee, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ashley, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Longee, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 14, 1922-1927, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

Response of recurrent medulloblastoma to low-dose oral etoposide

DM Ashley, L Meier, T Kerby, FM Zalduondo, HS Friedman, A Gajjar, L Kun, PK Duffner, S Smith and D Longee
Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

PURPOSE: The outcome for patients with recurrent medulloblastoma has historically been poor, with most patients dying of disseminated disease. Here, we report on seven patients with recurrent medulloblastoma, most heavily pretreated with a variety of chemotherapeutic agents, including parenteral etoposide (VP-16), who showed responses to the administration of repeated courses of low-dose oral VP-16. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven patients age 4 to 16 years were treated with VP-16 after neuroradiographic and clinical evidence of tumor progression. Six had received prior irradiation. All seven had been pretreated with a variety of chemotherapeutic agents and schedules, including parenteral VP-16. VP-16 was administered orally as repeated 21-day courses at 50 mg/m2/d with a 7-day interval between courses. Evaluation consisted of neuroradiographic and clinical examination after completion of every two courses of therapy. Complete blood cell counts were performed weekly. RESULTS: The major toxicity of oral VP-16 was hematologic, with two patients requiring platelet transfusions due to thrombocytopenia and two requiring RBC transfusions. All seven patients developed treatment-related neutropenia. Two patients were supported with granulocyte colony- stimulating factor (G-CSF) between courses. One patient developed infectious epididymitis after course 2 and required intravenous antibiotics; this illness was complicated by Clostridium difficile colitis. There was one episode of fever associated with neutropenia. There were no treatment-related deaths. Of seven patients assessed, six have demonstrated partial responses (PRs) and the remaining patient had stable disease (SD). CONCLUSION: This report demonstrates the activity of oral VP-16 in the treatment of a small cohort of pretreated patients with recurrent medulloblastoma. This form of administration of oral VP- 16 was well tolerated and produced modest toxicity.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
J. W. Mack, S. Joffe, J. M. Hilden, J. Watterson, C. Moore, J. C. Weeks, and J. Wolfe
Parents' Views of Cancer-Directed Therapy for Children With No Realistic Chance for Cure
J. Clin. Oncol., October 10, 2008; 26(29): 4759 - 4764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro Oncol DukeHome page
S. Gururangan, J. Krauser, M. A. Watral, T. Driscoll, N. Larrier, D. A. Reardon, J. N. Rich, J. A. Quinn, J. J. Vredenburgh, A. Desjardins, et al.
Efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy or standard salvage therapy in patients with recurrent medulloblastoma
Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2008; 10(5): 745 - 751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. C. Chamberlain
Treatment of Intracranial Metastatic Esthesioneuroblastoma
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2002; 20(1): 357 - 358.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. H. Kushner, K. Kramer, and N.-K. V. Cheung
Oral Etoposide for Refractory and Relapsed Neuroblastoma
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 1999; 17(10): 3221 - 3225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro Oncol DukeHome page
R. J. Packer, P. Cogen, G. Vezina, and L. B. Rorke
Medulloblastoma: Clinical and biologic aspects
Neuro-oncol, July 1, 1999; 1(3): 232 - 250.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
R. J. Packer and J. L. Finlay
Chemotherapy for Childhood Medulloblastoma and Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumors
Oncologist, December 1, 1996; 1(6): 381 - 393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online