Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Finlay, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Packer, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Finlay, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Packer, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 14, 2495-2503, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

Pilot study of high-dose thiotepa and etoposide with autologous bone marrow rescue in children and young adults with recurrent CNS tumors. The Children's Cancer Group

JL Finlay, S Goldman, MC Wong, M Cairo, J Garvin, C August, BH Cohen, P Stanley, RA Zimmerman, B Bostrom, JR Geyer, RE Harris, J Sanders, AJ Yates, JM Boyett and RJ Packer
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the toxicity, radiographic response rate, and outcome following high-dose thiotepa, etoposide, and autologous bone marrow rescue (ABMR) for young patients with recurrent malignant brain tumors. METHODS: Eligibility criteria required adequate renal, hepatic, and pulmonary function, and no bone marrow infiltration. Thiotepa 300 mg/m2 and etoposide 500 mg/ m2 were infused on 3 consecutive days, and autologous bone marrow was infused 72 hours following chemotherapy. RESULTS: Forty-five patients with recurrent high-grade brain tumors, aged 8 months to 36 years (median, 8 years), were treated. Seven patients (16%) died of treatment-related toxicities within 56 days of marrow reinfusion. Delayed platelet engraftment occurred in 44% of patients who survived beyond day 56. Of 35 patients with radiographically measurable disease who survived at least 28 days following ABMR, there were two complete responses (CRs) and six partial responses (PRs), for an overall response (CRs plus PRs) rate of 23% (SE = 7%). Objective responses were observed in four of 14 assessable patients with high-grade glioma and in two of six with primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs)/ medulloblastoma. Survival was significantly improved in patients treated with minimal residual disease (P < .0005). Five of 18 patients (28%) with high-grade gliomas remain free of disease at 39+, 44+, 49+, 52+, and 59+ months post-ABMR. CONCLUSION: The combination of high-dose thiotepa and etoposide has activity against a variety of recurrent childhood brain tumors. These results merit further evaluation in children and young adults with both recurrent and newly diagnosed high-grade brain tumors.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neuro OncolHome page
I. F. Pollack, R. I. Jakacki, S. M. Blaney, M. L. Hancock, M. W. Kieran, P. Phillips, L. E. Kun, H. Friedman, R. Packer, A. Banerjee, et al.
Phase I trial of imatinib in children with newly diagnosed brainstem and recurrent malignant gliomas: A Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium report
Neuro-oncol, April 1, 2007; 9(2): 145 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro OncolHome page
D. S. Ziegler, R. J. Cohn, G. McCowage, F. Alvaro, C. Oswald, R. Mrongovius, L. White, and for the Australian and New Zealand Children's Canc
Efficacy of vincristine and etoposide with escalating cyclophosphamide in poor-prognosis pediatric brain tumors
Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2006; 8(1): 53 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro OncolHome page
M. Massimino, L. Gandola, R. Luksch, F. Spreafico, D. Riva, C. Solero, F. Giangaspero, F. Locatelli, M. Podda, F. Bozzi, et al.
Sequential chemotherapy, high-dose thiotepa, circulating progenitor cell rescue, and radiotherapy for childhood high-grade glioma
Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2005; 7(1): 41 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. N. Chi, S. L. Gardner, A. S. Levy, E. A. Knopp, D. C. Miller, J. H. Wisoff, H. L. Weiner, and J. L. Finlay
Feasibility and Response to Induction Chemotherapy Intensified With High-Dose Methotrexate for Young Children With Newly Diagnosed High-Risk Disseminated Medulloblastoma
J. Clin. Oncol., December 15, 2004; 22(24): 4881 - 4887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
A. Broniscer and A. Gajjar
Supratentorial High-Grade Astrocytoma and Diffuse Brainstem Glioma: Two Challenges for the Pediatric Oncologist
Oncologist, April 1, 2004; 9(2): 197 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro OncolHome page
C. D. Turner, S. Gururangan, J. Eastwood, K. Bottom, M. Watral, R. Beason, R. E. McLendon, A. H. Friedman, S. Tourt-Uhlig, L. L. Miller, et al.
Phase II study of irinotecan (CPT-11) in children with high-risk malignant brain tumors: The Duke experience
Neuro-oncol, April 1, 2002; 4(2): 102 - 108.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. Strother, D. Ashley, S. J. Kellie, A. Patel, D. Jones-Wallace, S. Thompson, R. Heideman, E. Benaim, R. Krance, L. Bowman, et al.
Feasibility of Four Consecutive High-Dose Chemotherapy Cycles With Stem-Cell Rescue for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Medulloblastoma or Supratentorial Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor After Craniospinal Radiotherapy: Results of a Collaborative Study
J. Clin. Oncol., May 15, 2001; 19(10): 2696 - 2704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro OncolHome page
N. D. Doolittle, C. P. Anderson, W. A. Bleyer, J. G. Cairncross, T. Cloughesy, S. L. Eck, P. Guastadisegni, W. A. Hall, L. L. Muldoon, S. J. Patel, et al.
Importance of dose intensity in neurooncology clinical trials: Summary Report of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Consortium
Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2001; 3(1): 46 - 54.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro OncolHome page
R. J. Packer, P. Cogen, G. Vezina, and L. B. Rorke
Medulloblastoma: Clinical and biologic aspects
Neuro-oncol, July 1, 1999; 1(3): 232 - 250.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
D. A Walker, J. A G Punt, and M. Sokal
Clinical management of brain stem glioma
Arch. Dis. Child., June 1, 1999; 80(6): 558 - 564.
[Full Text]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
R. J. Packer
Brain Tumors in Children
Arch Neurol, April 1, 1999; 56(4): 421 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro OncolHome page
V. A. Levin
Chemotherapy for brain tumors of astrocytic and oligodendroglial lineage: The past decade and where we are heading
Neuro-oncol, January 1, 1999; 1(1): 69 - 80.
[Abstract] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online