Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 14, 2495-2503, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Pilot study of high-dose thiotepa and etoposide with autologous bone marrow rescue in children and young adults with recurrent CNS tumors. The Children's Cancer Group
JL Finlay, S Goldman, MC Wong, M Cairo, J Garvin, C August, BH Cohen, P Stanley, RA Zimmerman, B Bostrom, JR Geyer, RE Harris, J Sanders, AJ Yates, JM Boyett and RJ Packer
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the toxicity, radiographic
response rate, and outcome following high-dose thiotepa, etoposide, and
autologous bone marrow rescue (ABMR) for young patients with recurrent
malignant brain tumors. METHODS: Eligibility criteria required adequate
renal, hepatic, and pulmonary function, and no bone marrow infiltration.
Thiotepa 300 mg/m2 and etoposide 500 mg/ m2 were infused on 3 consecutive
days, and autologous bone marrow was infused 72 hours following
chemotherapy. RESULTS: Forty-five patients with recurrent high-grade brain
tumors, aged 8 months to 36 years (median, 8 years), were treated. Seven
patients (16%) died of treatment-related toxicities within 56 days of
marrow reinfusion. Delayed platelet engraftment occurred in 44% of patients
who survived beyond day 56. Of 35 patients with radiographically measurable
disease who survived at least 28 days following ABMR, there were two
complete responses (CRs) and six partial responses (PRs), for an overall
response (CRs plus PRs) rate of 23% (SE = 7%). Objective responses were
observed in four of 14 assessable patients with high-grade glioma and in
two of six with primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs)/ medulloblastoma.
Survival was significantly improved in patients treated with minimal
residual disease (P < .0005). Five of 18 patients (28%) with high-grade
gliomas remain free of disease at 39+, 44+, 49+, 52+, and 59+ months
post-ABMR. CONCLUSION: The combination of high-dose thiotepa and etoposide
has activity against a variety of recurrent childhood brain tumors. These
results merit further evaluation in children and young adults with both
recurrent and newly diagnosed high-grade brain tumors.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. F. Pollack, R. I. Jakacki, S. M. Blaney, M. L. Hancock, M. W. Kieran, P. Phillips, L. E. Kun, H. Friedman, R. Packer, A. Banerjee, et al.
Phase I trial of imatinib in children with newly diagnosed brainstem and recurrent malignant gliomas: A Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium report
Neuro-oncol,
April 1, 2007;
9(2):
145 - 160.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S. Ziegler, R. J. Cohn, G. McCowage, F. Alvaro, C. Oswald, R. Mrongovius, L. White, and for the Australian and New Zealand Children's Canc
Efficacy of vincristine and etoposide with escalating cyclophosphamide in poor-prognosis pediatric brain tumors
Neuro-oncol,
January 1, 2006;
8(1):
53 - 59.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Massimino, L. Gandola, R. Luksch, F. Spreafico, D. Riva, C. Solero, F. Giangaspero, F. Locatelli, M. Podda, F. Bozzi, et al.
Sequential chemotherapy, high-dose thiotepa, circulating progenitor cell rescue, and radiotherapy for childhood high-grade glioma
Neuro-oncol,
January 1, 2005;
7(1):
41 - 48.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. N. Chi, S. L. Gardner, A. S. Levy, E. A. Knopp, D. C. Miller, J. H. Wisoff, H. L. Weiner, and J. L. Finlay
Feasibility and Response to Induction Chemotherapy Intensified With High-Dose Methotrexate for Young Children With Newly Diagnosed High-Risk Disseminated Medulloblastoma
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 15, 2004;
22(24):
4881 - 4887.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Broniscer and A. Gajjar
Supratentorial High-Grade Astrocytoma and Diffuse Brainstem Glioma: Two Challenges for the Pediatric Oncologist
Oncologist,
April 1, 2004;
9(2):
197 - 206.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. D. Turner, S. Gururangan, J. Eastwood, K. Bottom, M. Watral, R. Beason, R. E. McLendon, A. H. Friedman, S. Tourt-Uhlig, L. L. Miller, et al.
Phase II study of irinotecan (CPT-11) in children with high-risk malignant brain tumors: The Duke experience
Neuro-oncol,
April 1, 2002;
4(2):
102 - 108.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Strother, D. Ashley, S. J. Kellie, A. Patel, D. Jones-Wallace, S. Thompson, R. Heideman, E. Benaim, R. Krance, L. Bowman, et al.
Feasibility of Four Consecutive High-Dose Chemotherapy Cycles With Stem-Cell Rescue for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Medulloblastoma or Supratentorial Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor After Craniospinal Radiotherapy: Results of a Collaborative Study
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 15, 2001;
19(10):
2696 - 2704.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. D. Doolittle, C. P. Anderson, W. A. Bleyer, J. G. Cairncross, T. Cloughesy, S. L. Eck, P. Guastadisegni, W. A. Hall, L. L. Muldoon, S. J. Patel, et al.
Importance of dose intensity in neurooncology clinical trials: Summary Report of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Consortium
Neuro-oncol,
January 1, 2001;
3(1):
46 - 54.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Packer, P. Cogen, G. Vezina, and L. B. Rorke
Medulloblastoma: Clinical and biologic aspects
Neuro-oncol,
July 1, 1999;
1(3):
232 - 250.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A Walker, J. A G Punt, and M. Sokal
Clinical management of brain stem glioma
Arch. Dis. Child.,
June 1, 1999;
80(6):
558 - 564.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. A. Levin
Chemotherapy for brain tumors of astrocytic and oligodendroglial lineage: The past decade and where we are heading
Neuro-oncol,
January 1, 1999;
1(1):
69 - 80.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|