Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 14, 2511-2520, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: the American Society of Clinical Oncology survey. The Health Services Research Committee of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
CL Bennett, TJ Smith, JC Weeks, AB Bredt, J Feinglass, JH Fetting, BE Hillner, MR Somerfield and RJ Winn
Department of Veterans Affairs, Lakeside Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
PURPOSE: Dissemination of use of the hematopoietic colony-stimulating
factors (CSFs) is unprecedented in oncology, with almost all physicians
having experience with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) shortly after the
drugs received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 1991. The
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Health Services Research
Committee sought to assess patterns of use of CSFs before dissemination of
its first-ever publication of ASCO guidelines. METHODS: A questionnaire
describing clinical scenarios was mailed to American oncologists and
hematologists who practice medical oncology. In each scenario, the
physician was asked whether he would prefer to use a CSF to prevent or
treat neutropenia. RESULTS: The response rate to the mailed survey was 49%
(N = 475). Most physicians preferred to use CSFs for secondary prophylaxis
in patients receiving chemotherapy at rates of 44% to 85%, rather than
reduce doses. Patterns of use did not differ for palliative, curative, or
adjuvant chemotherapy. While the majority of CSF patterns of care were
similar to those recommended in the ASCO guidelines, more than half of the
physicians chose to use CSFs in the treatment of febrile neutropenia, an
area not supported in the subsequent guidelines. In general, physicians at
academic medical centers and in Health Maintenance Organization (HMO)
practices were more likely to prefer dose-reduction strategies over
addition of CSFs, while fee-for-service physicians preferred the opposite
strategies. CONCLUSION: Variations in CSF preferences for use were related
to differences in clinical characteristics (history of afebrile v febrile
neutropenia), drug characteristics (G-CSF or GM-CSF), and physician
practice characteristics (HMO or fee-for-service setting). However, before
dissemination of the guidelines, the majority of American oncologists
preferred strategies that were subsequently included in the ASCO CSF
guidelines. CSF guidelines would be most likely to reduce CSF use for
treatment of afebrile and uncomplicated febrile neutropenia.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. N.H. Timmer-Bonte, E. M.M. Adang, E. Termeer, J. L. Severens, and V. C.G. Tjan-Heijnen
Modeling the Cost Effectiveness of Secondary Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis During Standard-Dose Chemotherapy
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 10, 2008;
26(2):
290 - 296.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Engert, J. Franklin, H. T. Eich, C. Brillant, S. Sehlen, C. Cartoni, R. Herrmann, M. Pfreundschuh, M. Sieber, H. Tesch, et al.
Two Cycles of Doxorubicin, Bleomycin, Vinblastine, and Dacarbazine Plus Extended-Field Radiotherapy Is Superior to Radiotherapy Alone in Early Favorable Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Final Results of the GHSG HD7 Trial
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 10, 2007;
25(23):
3495 - 3502.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Papaldo, M. Lopez, P. Marolla, E. Cortesi, M. Antimi, E. Terzoli, P. Vici, C. Barone, G. Ferretti, S. Di Cosimo, et al.
Impact of Five Prophylactic Filgrastim Schedules on Hematologic Toxicity in Early Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 1, 2005;
23(28):
6908 - 6918.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. C. Schneider, A. M. Epstein, J. L. Malin, K. L. Kahn, and E. J. Emanuel
Developing a System to Assess the Quality of Cancer Care: ASCO's National Initiative on Cancer Care Quality
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 2004;
22(15):
2985 - 2991.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. G. Pfister, D. H. Johnson, C. G. Azzoli, W. Sause, T. J. Smith, S. Baker Jr, J. Olak, D. Stover, J. R. Strawn, A. T. Turrisi, et al.
American Society of Clinical Oncology Treatment of Unresectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Guideline: Update 2003
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 15, 2004;
22(2):
330 - 353.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Engert, P. Schiller, A. Josting, R. Herrmann, P. Koch, M. Sieber, F. Boissevain, M. de Wit, J. Mezger, E. Duhmke, et al.
Involved-Field Radiotherapy Is Equally Effective and Less Toxic Compared With Extended-Field Radiotherapy After Four Cycles of Chemotherapy in Patients With Early-Stage Unfavorable Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Results of the HD8 Trial of the German Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 1, 2003;
21(19):
3601 - 3608.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Ozer, J. O. Armitage, C. L. Bennett, J. Crawford, G. D. Demetri, P. A. Pizzo, C. A. Schiffer, T. J. Smith, G. Somlo, J. C. Wade, et al.
2000 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Hematopoietic Colony-Stimulating Factors: Evidence-Based, Clinical Practice Guidelines
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 20, 2000;
18(20):
3558 - 3585.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Swanson, K. Bergstrom, E. Stump, T. Miyahara, and E. T. Herfindal
Growth Factor Usage Patterns and Outcomes in the Community Setting: Collection Through a Practice-Based Computerized Clinical Information System
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 1, 2000;
18(8):
1764 - 1770.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. L. Bennett, J. A. Weeks, M. R. Somerfield, J. Feinglass, and T. J. Smith
Use of Hematopoietic Colony-Stimulating Factors: Comparison of the 1994 and 1997 American Society of Clinical Oncology Surveys Regarding ASCO Clinical Practice Guidelines
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 1, 1999;
17(11):
3676 - 3681.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Debrix, C. Bouleuc, H. Liote, B. Milleron, A. Beker, C. L. Bennett, and M. R. Somerfield
Impact of American Society of Clinical Oncology Guidelines for Clinical Use of Colony-Stimulating Factors
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 1, 1999;
17(10):
3360 - 3361.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Talcott
Outpatient Management of Febrile Neutropenia: Should We Change the Standard of Care?
Oncologist,
December 1, 1997;
2(6):
365 - 373.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. C. Hartmann, L. K. Tschetter, T. M. Habermann, L. P. Ebbert, P. S. Johnson, J. A. Mailliard, R. Levitt, V. J. Suman, T. E. Witzig, H.S. Wieand, et al.
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Severe Chemotherapy-Induced Afebrile Neutropenia
N. Engl. J. Med.,
June 19, 1997;
336(25):
1776 - 1780.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|