Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 14, 2612-2621, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

Status of the medical oncology workforce. The American Society of Clinical Oncology


PURPOSE: A survey was designed to determine accurately the number of full-time equivalent medical oncologists in the United States, to determine how medical oncologists in different work settings divide their professional activities, and to determine whether medical oncology represents a primary care specialty in the minds of practicing oncologists. METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to the 4,239 members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) who identified themselves as medical oncologists or hematologists/oncologists and were current residents of the United States. Follow-up letters, which included a second copy of the questionnaire, were sent to nonresponders. A third mailing, followed by a telephone reminder, was sent to a randomly selected subset of 300 nonresponders to be certain that the initial responders were similar in practice patterns and attitudes to those individuals who had not initially completed the survey. RESULTS: A total of 2,540 physicians responded to the first mailing and an additional 187 to the second (64% response rate); a further 196 individuals who were directly contacted completed the survey document. Practitioners appear to see 160 to 200 different patients per month and to devote approximately 72% of their time to patient care activities. Research and teaching comprised only 3% to 4% of professional time for physicians in private practice or Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) settings, in contrast to 16% for those who worked in community hospitals. Medical oncologists frequently serve the role of principal care giver while patients are undergoing cancer treatment. However, medical oncologists devote minimal time providing primary care services to patients and, if required to increase their clinical volume, would prefer to care for more cancer patients than enhance their primary care activities. It is estimated that the present full-time equivalent number (ie, the conglomorate number of oncologists based on 100% professional effort devoted to clinical care) of medical oncologists is approximately 3,600 individuals. This translates into 1.8 medical oncologists per 100,000 adult Americans. CONCLUSION: The medical oncology community devotes the majority of its time to providing oncologic patient care and does not provide or appear to wish to provide what the public defines as primary care. The survey estimate of 1.8 medical oncologists per 100,000 adult Americans is in close accord with HMO estimates of the number of desired oncologists. Consequently, the supply appears consistent with the anticipated demand. There does not appear to be an oversupply of medical oncologists in the United States.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
C. F. Snyder, C. C. Earle, R. J. Herbert, B. A. Neville, A. L. Blackford, and K. D. Frick
Preventive Care for Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A 5-Year Longitudinal Study
J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2008; 26(7): 1073 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Oncol PractHome page
D. W. Blayney
Who Will Do the Work? What Work Will They Do?
J. Oncol. Pract, March 1, 2007; 3(2): 53 - 53.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Oncol PractHome page
C. Erikson, E. Salsberg, G. Forte, S. Bruinooge, and M. Goldstein
Future Supply and Demand for Oncologists : Challenges to Assuring Access to Oncology Services
J. Oncol. Pract, March 1, 2007; 3(2): 79 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
P. A. Ganz, L. Kwan, M. R. Somerfield, D. Alberts, J. E. Garber, K. Offit, and S. M. Lippman
The Role of Prevention in Oncology Practice: Results From a 2004 Survey of American Society of Clinical Oncology Members
J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2006; 24(18): 2948 - 2957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. A. Newton and M. S. Grayson
Trends in Career Choice by US Medical School Graduates
JAMA, September 3, 2003; 290(9): 1179 - 1182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ASH Education BookHome page
R. F. Todd III
A Guide to Planning Careers in Hematology and Oncology
Hematology, January 1, 2001; 2001(1): 499 - 506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online