Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Persson, I.
Right arrow Articles by Holmberg, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Persson, I.
Right arrow Articles by Holmberg, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 15, 3201-3207, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

Effect of estrogen and estrogen-progestin replacement regimens on mammographic breast parenchymal density

I Persson, E Thurfjell and L Holmberg
Department of Cancer Epidemiology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.

PURPOSE: Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) may increase the mammographic density with a possible reduction in the sensitivity or specificity. If so, the benefit of mammographic screening in women using HRT could be compromised. We evaluated the hypothesis that HRT regimens have differential effects on the mammographic density depending on treatment regimens or on age. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 31,498 Swedish women who received mammographic screening, we selected 554 women who started HRT after the first examination and who were current users at the second, and 554 age-matched women who had never received HRT. Mammograms were examined in a blinded review. The changes in density between the two examinations, graded as moderate or weak reduction, no change, or weak, moderate, or substantial increase, were assessed. We studied four HRT regimens-estradiol compounds only, estradiol compounds cyclically or continuously combined with progestins, and weak estrogens-and used descriptive statistics and logistic regression to analyze the association between HRT and density change. RESULTS: Density increased in 10% and 28% of women who received estradiol compounds with cyclically or continuously combined progestins, respectively, but in only 3% of unexposed women. Logistic regression analyses showed an elevated risk of a density increase (relative risk [RR] = 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6 to 7.7) in women who received cyclically combined regimens or continuously combined regimens (RR = 12.4; 95% CI, 6.3 to 24.4) compared with unexposed women. Women > or = 50 years of age had even stronger associations; RRs in women on estradiol only, the cyclically combined and the continuously combined regimens were 32.2 (95% CI, 3.9 to 267.5), 21.9 (95% CI, 1.9 to 251.5), and 176.9 (95% CI, 22.8 to 1,372.7), respectively. CONCLUSION: HRT with estradiol-progestin regimens, especially continuously combined, may increase the mammographic density in a substantial proportion of women.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
H. L. Jordan, J. L. Hopper, R. J. Thomson, A. M. Kavanagh, D. M. Gertig, J. Stone, and A. J. Venn
Influence of High-Dose Estrogen Exposure during Adolescence on Mammographic Density for Age in Adulthood
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2010; 19(1): 121 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. McTiernan, R. T. Chlebowski, C. Martin, J. D. Peck, A. Aragaki, E. D. Pisano, C.Y. Wang, K. C. Johnson, J. E. Manson, R. B. Wallace, et al.
Conjugated Equine Estrogen Influence on Mammographic Density in Postmenopausal Women in a Substudy of the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2009; 27(36): 6135 - 6143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. M. Tamimi, C. Byrne, G. A. Colditz, and S. E. Hankinson
Endogenous Hormone Levels, Mammographic Density, and Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women
J Natl Cancer Inst, August 1, 2007; 99(15): 1178 - 1187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
F. J.B. van Duijnhoven, P. H.M. Peeters, R. M.L. Warren, S. A. Bingham, P. A.H. van Noord, E. M. Monninkhof, D. E. Grobbee, and C. H. van Gils
Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Changes in Mammographic Density
J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2007; 25(11): 1323 - 1328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. J. R. Porter, A. J. Evans, E. J. Cornford, H. C. Burrell, J. J. James, A. H. S. Lee, and J. Chakrabarti
Influence of Mammographic Parenchymal Pattern in Screening-Detected and Interval Invasive Breast Cancers on Pathologic Features, Mammographic Features, and Patient Survival
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 676 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
P. A. Carney, E. Steiner, M. E. Goodrich, A. J. Dietrich, C. J. Kasales, J. E. Weiss, and T. MacKenzie
Discovery of Breast Cancers Within 1 Year of a Normal Screening Mammogram: How Are They Found?
Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2006; 4(6): 512 - 518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. M. Chiarelli, V. A. Kirsh, N. S. Klar, R. Shumak, R. Jong, E. Fishell, M. J. Yaffe, and N. F. Boyd
Influence of patterns of hormone replacement therapy use and mammographic density on breast cancer detection.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2006; 15(10): 1856 - 1862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. J. Fabian and B. F. Kimler
Mammographic Density: Use in Risk Assessment and as a Biomarker in Prevention Trials
J. Nutr., October 1, 2006; 136(10): 2705S - 2708S.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
F. J.B. van Duijnhoven, P. H.M. Peeters, R. M.L. Warren, S. A. Bingham, A. G. Uitterlinden, P. A.H. van Noord, E. M. Monninkhof, D. E. Grobbee, and C. H. van Gils
Influence of Estrogen Receptor {alpha} and Progesterone Receptor Polymorphisms on the Effects of Hormone Therapy on Mammographic Density.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2006; 15(3): 462 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. M. Tamimi, S. E. Hankinson, G. A. Colditz, and C. Byrne
Endogenous Sex Hormone Levels and Mammographic Density among Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2005; 14(11): 2641 - 2647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. McTiernan, C. F. Martin, J. D. Peck, A. K. Aragaki, R. T. Chlebowski, E. D. Pisano, C. Y. Wang, R. L. Brunner, K. C. Johnson, J. E. Manson, et al.
Estrogen-Plus-Progestin Use and Mammographic Density in Postmenopausal Women: Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 21, 2005; 97(18): 1366 - 1376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F.-P. Chen, Y.-C. Cheung, L.-F. Teng, and Y.-K. Soong
The relationship between mammographic density and duration of hormone therapy: effects of estrogen and estrogen-progestin
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1741 - 1745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J.-P. Delille, P. J. Slanetz, E. D. Yeh, D. B. Kopans, E. F. Halpern, and L. Garrido
Hormone Replacement Therapy in Postmenopausal Women: Breast Tissue Perfusion Determined with MR Imaging--Initial Observations
Radiology, April 1, 2005; 235(1): 36 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
L. A. Habel, J. J. Dignam, S. R. Land, M. Salane, A. M. Capra, and T. B. Julian
Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer After Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 6, 2004; 96(19): 1467 - 1472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. H. Lai, D. Vesprini, W. Zhang, M. J. Yaffe, M. Pollak, and S. A. Narod
A Polymorphic Locus in the Promoter Region of the IGFBP3 Gene Is Related to Mammographic Breast Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2004; 13(4): 573 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. O. Lillie, L. Bernstein, S. A. Ingles, W. J. Gauderman, G. E. Rivas, V. Gagalang, T. Krontiris, and G. Ursin
Polymorphism in the Androgen Receptor and Mammographic Density in Women Taking and Not Taking Estrogen and Progestin Therapy
Cancer Res., February 15, 2004; 64(4): 1237 - 1241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Harvey and V. E. Bovbjerg
Quantitative Assessment of Mammographic Breast Density: Relationship with Breast Cancer Risk
Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 29 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
P. A. Carney, D. L. Miglioretti, B. C. Yankaskas, K. Kerlikowske, R. Rosenberg, C. M. Rutter, B. M. Geller, L. A. Abraham, S. H. Taplin, M. Dignan, et al.
Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening Mammography
Ann Intern Med, February 4, 2003; 138(3): 168 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. T. Chlebowski and A. McTiernan
Biological Significance of Interventions That Change Breast Density
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 1, 2003; 95(1): 4 - 5.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
G. A. Greendale, B. A. Reboussin, S. Slone, C. Wasilauskas, M. C. Pike, and G. Ursin
Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Change in Mammographic Density
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 1, 2003; 95(1): 30 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. J. Fabian, B. F. Kimler, D. A. Brady, M. S. Mayo, C. H. J. Chang, J. A. Ferraro, C. M. Zalles, A. L. Stanton, S. Masood, W. E. Grizzle, et al.
A Phase II Breast Cancer Chemoprevention Trial of Oral {alpha}-Difluoromethylornithine: Breast Tissue, Imaging, and Serum and Urine Biomarkers
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2002; 8(10): 3105 - 3117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J M Dixon
Hormone replacement therapy and the breast
BMJ, December 15, 2001; 323(7326): 1381 - 1382.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. Freedman, J. S. Martin, J. O'Gorman, S. Eckert, M. E. Lippman, S.-C. B. Lo, E. L. Walls, and J. Zeng
Digitized Mammography: a Clinical Trial of Postmenopausal Women Randomly Assigned to Receive Raloxifene, Estrogen, or Placebo
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 3, 2001; 93(1): 51 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. J. Santen, J. Pinkerton, C. McCartney, and G. R. Petroni
Risk of Breast Cancer with Progestins in Combination with Estrogen as Hormone Replacement Therapy
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2001; 86(1): 16 - 23.
[Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
L. A. Bazzano, G. Del Priore, M.-J. Lee, A. N. Glaser, J. A. Harvey, C. J. Newschaffer, K. J. Helzlsouer, C. A. Roca, P. J. Schmidt, R. C. Daly, et al.
Estrogen-Progestin Replacement and Risk of Breast Cancer
JAMA, August 9, 2000; 284(6): 691 - 694.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
E. Sala, R. Warren, J. McCann, S. Duffy, R. Luben, and N. Day
High-risk mammographic parenchymal patterns, hormone replacement therapy and other risk factors: a case-control study
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2000; 29(4): 629 - 636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. Trentham-Dietz, P. A. Newcomb, B. E. Storer, and P. L. Remington
Risk Factors for Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2000; 9(7): 697 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. Fowble, A. Hanlon, G. Freedman, A. Patchefsky, H. Kessler, N. Nicolaou, J. Hoffman, E. Sigurdson, M. Boraas, and L. Goldstein
Postmenopausal Hormone Replacement Therapy: Effect on Diagnosis and Outcome in Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer Treated With Conservative Surgery and Radiation
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 1999; 17(6): 1680 - 1680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
C. J. Baines and R. Dayan
A Tangled Web: Factors Likely to Affect the Efficacy of Screening Mammography
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 19, 1999; 91(10): 833 - 838.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
ESTROGENS INCREASE BREAST DENSITY ON MAMMOGRAPHY
Journal Watch (General), October 24, 1997; 1997(1024): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online