Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geller, G.
Right arrow Articles by Holtzman, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geller, G.
Right arrow Articles by Holtzman, N. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 16, 2868-2876, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

Decision-making about breast cancer susceptibility testing: how similar are the attitudes of physicians, nurse practitioners, and at-risk women?

G Geller, BA Bernhardt, T Doksum, KJ Helzlsouer, P Wilcox and NA Holtzman
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. ggeller@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu

PURPOSE: To determine what consumers and providers would want to discuss about breast cancer susceptibility testing (BCST) and their preferred role in testing decisions. METHODS: We surveyed 426 at-risk women, 143 nurse practitioners, and 296 physicians in five specialties in Maryland. RESULTS: All groups believe it is important to discuss how the chance of breast cancer can be reduced and what the chances are of getting breast cancer if the test is positive. Both provider groups attributed more importance than consumers to discussing whether cancer can occur if the test is negative. Discussing the risk of depression and anxiety was more important to providers than consumers. Eighty-two percent of women would want their providers to make a recommendation about testing, but only 43% of nurse practitioners and 68% of physicians would do so. Eighteen percent of physicians underestimated the importance of informed consent for testing and 34% of discussing the risk of insurance discrimination. Fewer than 6% of women, if found to have a mutation, would be likely to undergo prophylactic mastectomy, whereas 12% of nurse practitioners and 34% of physicians would be likely to recommend such surgery. One third of respondents in all three groups supported testing a 13-year old daughter of a mutation-carrier. CONCLUSION: Physicians should place greater value on informed consent and discussing practical aspects of testing, and physicians and nurse practitioners should pay more attention to the limitations of testing children, insurance discrimination, and consumers' desire for provider recommendations. In light of the limited discordance between nurse practitioners and consumers, nurse practitioners can play an increasing role in education and counseling about BCST.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. L. Sabichi, M.-F. Demierre, E. T. Hawk, C. E. Lerman, and S. M. Lippman
Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Res., September 15, 2003; 63(18): 5649 - 5655.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. Rosen, S. Wallenstein, and M. M. McGovern
Attitudes of Pediatric Residents Toward Ethical Issues Associated With Genetic Testing in Children
Pediatrics, August 1, 2002; 110(2): 360 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. A. Peterson, K. J. Milliron, K. E. Lewis, S. D. Goold, and S. D. Merajver
Health Insurance and Discrimination Concerns and BRCA1/2 Testing in a Clinic Population
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2002; 11(1): 79 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. Stefanek, L. Hartmann, and W. Nelson
Risk-Reduction Mastectomy: Clinical Issues and Research Needs
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 5, 2001; 93(17): 1297 - 1297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. N. Peshkin, T. A. DeMarco, B. M. Brogan, C. Lerman, and C. Isaacs
BRCA1/2 Testing: Complex Themes in Result Interpretation
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2001; 19(9): 2555 - 2565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. T. Matloff, H. Shappell, K. Brierley, B. A. Bernhardt, W. McKinnon, and B. N. Peshkin
What Would You Do? Specialists' Perspectives on Cancer Genetic Testing, Prophylactic Surgery, and Insurance Discrimination
J. Clin. Oncol., June 12, 2000; 18(12): 2484 - 2492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. B. Daly, K. Offit, F. Li, G. Glendon, A. Yaker, D. West, B. Koenig, M. McCredie, V. Venne, S. Nayfield, et al.
Participation in the Cooperative Family Registry for Breast Cancer Studies: Issues of Informed Consent
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 15, 2000; 92(6): 452 - 456.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
F. Eisinger, C. Julian-Reynier, H. Sobol, D. Stoppa-Lyonnet, C. Lasset, and C. Nogues
Acceptability of Prophylactic Mastectomy in Cancer-Prone Women
JAMA, January 12, 2000; 283(2): 202 - 203.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online