Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 17, Issue 1
(January), 1999: 41
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Positron Emission Tomography for Evaluating Para-aortic Nodal Metastasis in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Before Surgical Staging: A Surgicopathologic Study
Peter G. Rose,
Lee P. Adler,
Michael Rodriguez,
Peter F. Faulhaber,
Fadi W. Abdul-Karim,
Floro Miraldi
From the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Reproductive Biology, Ireland Cancer Center; Departments of Radiology and Department of Pathology, University Hospitals of Cleveland; and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
Address reprint requests to Peter G. Rose, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106.
PURPOSE: Positron emission tomographic (PET) scanning provides a novel means of imaging malignancies. This prospective study was undertaken to evaluate PET scanning in detecting para-aortic nodal metastasis in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma and no evidence of extrapelvic disease before planned surgical staging lymphadenectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After 20 mCi of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) were administered intravenously, the abdomen and pelvis were scanned. Continuous bladder irrigation was used to reduce artifact. Patients were classified by the presence or absence of FDG uptake in the primary tumor and in pelvic or para-aortic nodes. Para-aortic node metastases were classified as present or absent according to a standardized staging procedure. Pelvic node metastases were similarly classified in a subset of patients who underwent pelvic node resection.
RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with stage IIB (n = 6), IIIB (n = 24), and IVA (n = 2) tumors were studied. Fluorodeoxyglucose was taken up by 91% of the cervical tumors. Six of eight patients with positive para-aortic node metastasis had PET scan evidence of para-aortic nodal metastasis. One of the two false-negatives had only one microscopic focus of metastatic cancer. In the para-aortic nodes, PET scanning had a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 92%, a positive predictive value of 75%, and a negative predictive value of 92%. Fluorodeoxyglucose para-aortic nodal uptake conferred a relative risk of 9.0 (95% confidence interval, 2.3 to 36.0) for para-aortic nodal metastasis. All 10 of 17 patients with metastasis were predicted by PET scanning (P < .001); five of these patients had abnormalities on computed tomographic scans.
CONCLUSION: Cervical cancers have a high avidity for FDG. The use of PET-FDG scanning accurately predicts both the presence and absence of pelvic and para-aortic nodal metastatic disease.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Boughanim, S. Leboulleux, A. Rey, C. Tuan Pham, Y. Zafrani, P. Duvillard, J. Lumbroso, C. Haie-Meder, M. Schlumberger, and P. Morice
Histologic Results of Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy in Patients Treated for Stage IB2/II Cervical Cancer With Negative [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Scans in the Para-Aortic Area
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 20, 2008;
26(15):
2558 - 2561.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Toita, T. Kodaira, T. Uno, A. Shinoda, Y. Akino, M. Mitsumori, and T. Teshima
Patterns of Pretreatment Diagnostic Assessment and Staging for Patients with Cervical Cancer (1999-2001): Patterns of Care Study in Japan
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 17, 2008;
(2008)
hym136v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. A. Margolis, J. M. Hoffman, R. J. Herfkens, R. B. Jeffrey, A. Quon, and S. S. Gambhir
Molecular Imaging Techniques in Body Imaging
Radiology,
November 1, 2007;
245(2):
333 - 356.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Gregoire, K. Haustermans, X. Geets, S. Roels, and M. Lonneux
PET-Based Treatment Planning in Radiotherapy: A New Standard?
J. Nucl. Med.,
January 1, 2007;
48(1_suppl):
68S - 77S.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-H. Chou, T.-C. Chang, T.-C. Yen, K.-K. Ng, S. Hsueh, S.-Y. Ma, C.-J. Chang, H.-J. Huang, A. Chao, T.-I Wu, et al.
Low Value of [18F]-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography in Primary Staging of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Before Radical Hysterectomy
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 1, 2006;
24(1):
123 - 128.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Sironi, A. Buda, M. Picchio, P. Perego, R. Moreni, A. Pellegrino, M. Colombo, C. Mangioni, C. Messa, and F. Fazio
Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Clinical Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Detection with Integrated FDG PET/CT
Radiology,
December 1, 2005;
238(1):
272 - 279.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Park, Y. J. Park, S. J. Huh, B. G. Kim, D. S. Bae, J. Lee, B. H. Kim, J. Y. Choi, Y. C. Ahn, and D. H. Lim
The Usefulness of MRI and PET Imaging for the Detection of Parametrial Involvement and Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Cervical Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 1, 2005;
35(5):
260 - 264.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. W. Grigsby, B. A. Siegel, F. Dehdashti, J. Rader, and I. Zoberi
Posttherapy [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Carcinoma of the Cervix: Response and Outcome
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 1, 2004;
22(11):
2167 - 2171.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Lerman, U. Metser, D. Grisaru, A. Fishman, G. Lievshitz, and E. Even-Sapir
Normal and Abnormal 18F-FDG Endometrial and Ovarian Uptake in Pre- and Postmenopausal Patients: Assessment by PET/CT
J. Nucl. Med.,
February 1, 2004;
45(2):
266 - 271.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T.-C. Yen, L.-C. See, C.-H. Lai, C. W. Yah-Huei, K.-K. Ng, S.-Y. Ma, W.-J. Lin, J.-T. Chen, W.-J. Chen, C.-R. Lai, et al.
18F-FDG Uptake in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix Is Correlated with Glucose Transporter 1 Expression
J. Nucl. Med.,
January 1, 2004;
45(1):
22 - 29.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-Y. Ma, L.-C. See, C.-H. Lai, H.-H. Chou, C.-S. Tsai, K.-K. Ng, S. Hsueh, W.-J. Lin, J.-T. Chen, and T.-C. Yen
Delayed 18F-FDG PET for Detection of Paraaortic Lymph Node Metastases in Cervical Cancer Patients
J. Nucl. Med.,
November 1, 2003;
44(11):
1775 - 1783.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T.-C. Yen, K.-K. Ng, S.-Y. Ma, H.-H. Chou, C.-S. Tsai, S. Hsueh, T.-C. Chang, J.-H. Hong, L.-C. See, W.-J. Lin, et al.
Value of Dual-Phase 2-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography in Cervical Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 1, 2003;
21(19):
3651 - 3658.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Kaur, P. M. Silverman, R. B. Iyer, C. F. Verschraegen, P. J. Eifel, and C. Charnsangavej
Diagnosis, Staging, and Surveillance of Cervical Carcinoma
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
June 1, 2003;
180(6):
1621 - 1631.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W.-J. Koh
Controversies in the Radiotherapeutic Management of Cervical Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 15, 2003;
21(90100):
218s - 223.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-Y. Ryu, M.-H. Kim, S.-C. Choi, C.-W. Choi, and K.-H. Lee
Detection of Early Recurrence with 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Cervical Cancer
J. Nucl. Med.,
March 1, 2003;
44(3):
347 - 352.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. R. Miller, E. Pinkus, F. Dehdashti, and P. W. Grigsby
Improved Prognostic Value of 18F-FDG PET Using a Simple Visual Analysis of Tumor Characteristics in Patients with Cervical Cancer
J. Nucl. Med.,
February 1, 2003;
44(2):
192 - 197.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. V. Fiorica
Update on the Treatment of Cervical and Uterine Carcinoma: Focus on Topotecan
Oncologist,
October 1, 2002;
7(90005):
36 - 45.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. A. Siegel, L. P. Adler, R. L. Wahl, A. Williams, N. DeSouza, and A. M. Peters
FDG Positron Emission Tomography Detection of Pelvic Nodal Metastases in Gynecologic Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
March 1, 2002;
178
(3):
762 - 764.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. W. Grigsby, B. A. Siegel, and F. Dehdashti
Lymph Node Staging by Positron Emission Tomography in Patients With Carcinoma of the Cervix
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 1, 2001;
19(17):
3745 - 3749.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. S. Gambhir, J. Czernin, J. Schwimmer, D. H. S. Silverman, R. E. Coleman, and M. E. Phelps
A Tabulated Summary of the FDG PET Literature
J. Nucl. Med.,
May 1, 2001;
42(90050):
1S - 93.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. F. Janicek and H. E. Averette
Cervical Cancer: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapeutics
CA Cancer J Clin,
March 1, 2001;
51(2):
92 - 114.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Reinhardt, C. Ehritt-Braun, D. Vogelgesang, C. Ihling, S. Högerle, M. Mix, E. Moser, and T. M. Krause
Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Patients with Cervical Cancer: Detection with MR Imaging and FDG PET
Radiology,
March 1, 2001;
218(3):
776 - 782.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|