Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 17, Issue 11
(November), 1999: 3457-3460
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Positron Emission Tomography Scans in the Evaluation of Postchemotherapy Residual Masses in Patients With Seminoma
Kristen N. Ganjoo,
Rebecca J. Chan,
Matt Sharma,
Lawrence H. Einhorn
From the Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN.
Address reprint requests to Lawrence H. Einhorn, MD, Indiana University, Indiana Cancer Pavilion, 535 Barnhill Dr, Route 473, Indianapolis, IN 46202.
PURPOSE: To assess the ability of positron emission tomography (PET) scans in differentiating between necrosis and viable seminoma in postchemotherapy (PC) residual disease.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 29 patients with seminoma at Indiana University. All patients had PC residual disease. Computed tomography and PET scans were performed for 19 patients after primary chemotherapy (group A) and for 10 patients after salvage chemotherapy (group B).
RESULTS: In group A, the PC masses were 3 cm in 14 patients, less than 3 cm in three patients, and not quantified in two patients. All of the patients in group A had negative PET scan results and have had stable or decreasing residual mass size (median follow-up duration, 11.5 months; range, 6 to 26 months). In group B, the PC masses were 3 cm in four patients, less than 3 cm in five patients, and not quantified in one patient. One patient had a positive PET scan result for a posterior mediastinal mass. Pathologic diagnosis of the PET-positive mass showed only necrotic tissue. The same patient had a negative PET scan of the retroperitoneal mass but relapsed in that area. Overall, of patients in group B, five have stable or decreasing mass (median follow-up duration, 8 months; range, 7 to 22 months), and five had relapsed disease.
CONCLUSION: PET scans have no apparent benefit in PC evaluation of residual masses in bulky seminoma.
Presented in part at the Thirty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Atlanta, GA, May 15-18, 1999.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Iwasa, M. Ando, M. Ono, T. Hirata, M. Yunokawa, E. Nakano, K. Yonemori, T. Kouno, C. Shimizu, K. Tamura, et al.
Relapse with Malignant Transformation After Chemotherapy for Primary Mediastinal Seminoma: Case Report
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 1, 2009;
39(7):
456 - 459.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. De Santis, A. Becherer, C. Bokemeyer, F. Stoiber, K. Oechsle, F. Sellner, A. Lang, K. Kletter, B. M. Dohmen, C. Dittrich, et al.
2-18fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose Positron Emission Tomography Is a Reliable Predictor for Viable Tumor in Postchemotherapy Seminoma: An Update of the Prospective Multicentric SEMPET Trial
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 15, 2004;
22(6):
1034 - 1039.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. De Santis, C. Bokemeyer, A. Becherer, F. Stoiber, K. Oechsle, K. Kletter, B. M. Dohmen, C. Dittrich, and J. Pont
Predictive Impact of 2-18Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography for Residual Postchemotherapy Masses in Patients With Bulky Seminoma
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 1, 2001;
19(17):
3740 - 3744.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S F Barrington
Whole body applications of positron emission tomography in oncology
Imaging,
September 1, 2001;
13(3):
185 - 196.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|