Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 17, Issue 3
(March), 1999: 756
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Phase II Study of Cisplatin and Vinorelbine as First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix
Sandro Pignata,
Giustino Silvestro,
Ettore Ferrari,
Luigi Selvaggi,
Francesco Perrone,
Antonio Maffeo,
Pasquale Frezza,
Giovanni Di Vagno,
Gennaro Casella,
Paolo Ricchi,
Gennaro Cormio,
Ciro Gallo,
Francesco Iodice,
Frank Romeo,
Roberto Fiorentino,
Giovanni Fortuna,
Sergio Tramontana
From the Divisione di Oncologia Medica B, Divisione di Radioterapia, Ufficio Sperimentazioni Cliniche Controllate, and Divisione di Ginecologia, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Napoli; II Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Policlinico, Università di Bari; and Metodologia Epidemiologica Clinica, Seconda Università di Napoli, Napoli, Italy.
Address reprint requests to Sandro Pignata, MD, Divisione di Oncologia Medica B, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione Pascale, Via M Semmola, 80131 Napoli, Italy
PURPOSE: To evaluate the activity and toxicity of the combination of cisplatin (80 mg/m2 day 1) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 days 1 and 8) in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix that has not been previously treated with chemotherapy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with cervical cancer were enrolled onto this study (27 stage IB-III, 23 stage IVB-recurrent). A two-stage optimal Simon design was applied. Thirteen responders of 29 treated patients were required to proceed beyond the first stage, and 28 responders were needed overall.
RESULTS: Hematologic toxicity was mild, with neutropenia being the most frequent side effect. Nonhematologic toxicity was frequent but never severe; one patient had grade 3 peripheral neurotoxicity. Objective responses were recorded for 32 patients (64%): 11 patients (22%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 21 patients (42%) achieved a partial response (PR). The response rate was 81.5% in patients with IB-III stage (25.9% CR rate) and 43.5% in patients with IVB-recurrent disease (17.4% CR rate). Responses were seen both in stage IVB patients (one CR and two PRs, for an overall rate of 37.5%) and in patients with recurrent disease (three CRs + four PRs, for an overall rate of 46.7%).
CONCLUSION: The combination of cisplatin and vinorelbine is an active regimen in the treatment of patients with early-stage and advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix. The hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity of this combination is mild.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. J. Long III
Management of Metastatic Cervical Cancer: Review of the Literature
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 10, 2007;
25(20):
2966 - 2974.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. van Luijk, C Coens, M. van der Burg, A Kobierska, M Namer, C Lhomme, P Zola, G Zanetta, J. Vermorken, and For the Gynecological Cancer Group of the European
Phase II study of bleomycin, vindesine, mitomycin C and cisplatin (BEMP) in recurrent or disseminated squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix
Ann. Onc.,
February 1, 2007;
18(2):
275 - 281.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Morris, J. A. Blessing, B. J. Monk, R. McGehee, and D. H. Moore
Phase II Study of Cisplatin and Vinorelbine in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 15, 2004;
22(16):
3340 - 3344.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. H. Moore, J. A. Blessing, R. P. McQuellon, H. T. Thaler, D. Cella, J. Benda, D. S. Miller, G. Olt, S. King, J. F. Boggess, et al.
Phase III Study of Cisplatin With or Without Paclitaxel in Stage IVB, Recurrent, or Persistent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 2004;
22(15):
3113 - 3119.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Duenas-Gonzalez, C. Lopez-Graniel, A. Gonzalez-Enciso, L. Cetina, L. Rivera, I. Mariscal, G. Montalvo, E. Gomez, J. de la Garza, G. Chanona, et al.
A phase II study of multimodality treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer: neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by radical hysterectomy and adjuvant cisplatin chemoradiation
Ann. Onc.,
August 1, 2003;
14(8):
1278 - 1284.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. G. Rose
Combined-Modality Therapy of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 15, 2003;
21(90100):
211s - 217.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Duenas-Gonzalez, C. Lopez-Graniel, A. Gonzalez-Enciso, A. Mohar, L. Rivera, A. Mota, R. Guadarrama, G. Chanona, and J. de la Garza
Concomitant chemoradiation versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical carcinoma: results from two consecutive phase II studies
Ann. Onc.,
August 1, 2002;
13(8):
1212 - 1219.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Friedlander and M. Grogan
Guidelines for the Treatment of Recurrent and Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Oncologist,
August 1, 2002;
7(4):
342 - 347.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|