Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 17, Issue 3
(March), 1999: 761
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Phase II Trial of Paclitaxel and Cisplatin in Metastatic and Recurrent Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix
Christos A. Papadimitriou,
Kyrillos Sarris,
Lia A. Moulopoulos,
George Fountzilas,
Athanassios Anagnostopoulos,
Zannis Voulgaris,
Dimitra Gika,
Nikolaos Giannakoulis,
Emmanuel Diakomanolis,
Meletios A. Dimopoulos
From the Departments of Clinical Therapeutics, Gynecology, Radiation Oncology, and Radiology, Alexandra Hospital, University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece; and Department of Internal Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Address reprint requests to Meletios A. Dimopoulos, MD, 227 Kifissias Ave, 14561 Kifissia, Athens, Greece.
PURPOSE: Both paclitaxel and cisplatin have moderate activity in patients with metastatic or recurrent cancer of the cervix, and the combination of these two agents has shown activity and possible synergism in a variety of solid tumors. We administered this combination to patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer to evaluate its activity.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive patients were treated on an outpatient basis with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 administered intravenously over a 3-hour period followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 administered intravenously with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. The chemotherapy was administered every 3 weeks for a maximum of six courses.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients (47%; 95% confidence interval, 30% to 65%) achieved an objective response, including five complete responses and 11 partial responses. Responses occurred in 28% of patients with disease within the radiation field only and in 57% of patients with disease involving other sites. The median duration of response was 5.5 months, and the median times to progression and survival for all patients were 5 and 9 months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities included anemia in 18% of patients and granulocytopenia in 15% of patients. Fifty-three percent of patients developed some degree of neurotoxicity; 21% of cases were grade 2 or worse.
CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel with cisplatin seems relatively well tolerated and moderately active in patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer. The significant incidence of neurotoxicity is of concern, and alternative methods of administration of the two agents could be evaluated. Then, further study of this combination, alone or with the addition of other active agents, is warranted.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Mountzios, M. A. Dimopoulos, A. Bamias, G. Vourli, H. Kalofonos, G. Aravantinos, G. Fountzilas, and C. A. Papadimitriou
Randomized multicenter phase II trial of cisplatin and ifosfamide with or without paclitaxel in recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) study
Ann. Onc.,
August 1, 2009;
20(8):
1362 - 1368.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. J. Long III
Management of Metastatic Cervical Cancer: Review of the Literature
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 10, 2007;
25(20):
2966 - 2974.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. H. Moore, J. A. Blessing, R. P. McQuellon, H. T. Thaler, D. Cella, J. Benda, D. S. Miller, G. Olt, S. King, J. F. Boggess, et al.
Phase III Study of Cisplatin With or Without Paclitaxel in Stage IVB, Recurrent, or Persistent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 2004;
22(15):
3113 - 3119.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Duenas-Gonzalez, C. Lopez-Graniel, A. Gonzalez-Enciso, L. Cetina, L. Rivera, I. Mariscal, G. Montalvo, E. Gomez, J. de la Garza, G. Chanona, et al.
A phase II study of multimodality treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer: neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by radical hysterectomy and adjuvant cisplatin chemoradiation
Ann. Onc.,
August 1, 2003;
14(8):
1278 - 1284.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|