Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 17, Issue 5
(May), 1999: 1551
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Plasmablastic Morphology Is an Independent Predictor of Poor Survival After Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma
S. Vincent Rajkumar,
Rafael Fonseca,
Martha Q. Lacy,
Thomas E. Witzig,
Terry M. Therneau,
Robert A. Kyle,
Mark R. Litzow,
Morie A. Gertz,
Philip R. Greipp
From the Division of Hematology and Internal Medicine and the Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN.
Address reprint requests to Philip R. Greipp, MD, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; email greipp.philip{at}mayo.edu
PURPOSE: To study the prognostic value of plasmablastic morphology after autologous stem-cell transplantation for relapsed or primary refractory myeloma.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-five patients were studied. Investigators blinded to the clinical details of the individual cases reviewed bone marrow aspirate slides to determine plasmablastic classification. Plasmablasts were defined using strict, well-described criteria. Plasmablastic morphology was considered to be present (plasmablastic myeloma) when 2% or more plasmablasts were present in the plasma-cell population.
RESULTS: Patients underwent transplantation 5 to 88 months (median, 20 months) after the initial diagnosis of myeloma. Twenty-eight percent of patients had plasmablastic morphology. A significantly greater proportion of patients with plasmablastic morphology had abnormal cytogenetics compared with those with nonplasmablastic classification (73% v 31%, respectively; P = .003). The overall survival rate measured from the time of transplantation was significantly worse in patients with plasmablastic morphology compared with those without (median survival time, 5 months v 24 months, respectively; P < .001). Progression-free survival time was shortened also, with a median time of 4 months compared with 12 months, respectively (P < .001). In the multivariate analysis, plasmablastic classification was the most powerful prognostic factor after transplantation for both overall (P = .001) and progression-free survival rates (P < .001). We also identified three risk groups based on plasmablastic morphology: plasma-cell labeling index, lactate dehydrogenase, and cytogenetics. The median overall survival time was 38 months when none of these factors was abnormal, 17 months with one abnormal factor, and 8 months with two or more abnormal factors (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Plasmablastic morphology is a powerful independent predictor of poor survival rate after autologous stem-cell transplantation for relapsed or primary refractory myeloma.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Ayliffe, F. E. Davies, D. de Castro, and G. J. Morgan
Demonstration of changes in plasma cell subsets in multiple myeloma
Haematologica,
August 1, 2007;
92(8):
1135 - 1138.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L.M. Boylan, M. A. Gosse, S. E. Staggs, S. Janz, S. Grindle, G. S. Kansas, and B. G. Van Ness
A Transgenic Mouse Model of Plasma Cell Malignancy Shows Phenotypic, Cytogenetic, and Gene Expression Heterogeneity Similar to Human Multiple Myeloma
Cancer Res.,
May 1, 2007;
67(9):
4069 - 4078.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Fonseca, D. Harrington, M. M. Oken, G. W. Dewald, R. J. Bailey, S. A. Van Wier, K. J. Henderson, E. A. Blood, S. V. Rajkumar, N. E. Kay, et al.
Biological and Prognostic Significance of Interphase Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Detection of Chromosome 13 Abnormalities ({Delta}13) in Multiple Myeloma: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study
Cancer Res.,
February 1, 2002;
62(3):
715 - 720.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. V. Rajkumar, T. Leong, P. C. Roche, R. Fonseca, A. Dispenzieri, M. Q. Lacy, J. A. Lust, T. E. Witzig, R. A. Kyle, M. A. Gertz, et al.
Prognostic Value of Bone Marrow Angiogenesis in Multiple Myeloma
Clin. Cancer Res.,
August 1, 2000;
6(8):
3111 - 3116.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|