Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 17, Issue 5
(May), 1999: 1601
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Impact of Therapeutic Research on Informed Consent and the Ethics of Clinical Trials: A Medical Oncology Perspective
Christopher K. Daugherty
From the Section of Hematology-Oncology and the MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Address reprint requests to Christopher K. Daugherty, MD, MC 2115/Section of Hematology-Oncology and the MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637-1470; email kdaughe{at}mcis.bsd.uchicago.edu
PURPOSE: To create a more meaningful understanding of the informed consent process as it has come to be practiced and regulated in clinical trials, this discussion uses the experience gained from the conduct of therapeutic research that involves cancer patients.
DESIGN: After an introduction of the ethical tenets of the consent process in clinical research that involves potentially vulnerable patients as research subjects, background that details the use of written consent documents and of the term "informed consent" is provided. Studies from the cancer setting that examine the inadequacies of written consent documents, and the outcome of the consent process itself, are reviewed. Two ethically challenging areas of cancer clinical research, the phase I trial and the randomized controlled trial, are discussed briefly as a means of highlighting many dilemmas present in clinical trials. Before concluding, areas for future research are discussed.
RESULTS: Through an exclusive cancer research perspective, many current deficiencies in the informed consent process for therapeutic clinical trials can be critically examined. Also, new directions for improvements and areas of further research can be outlined and discussed objectively. The goals of such improvements and research should be prevention of further misguided or ineffective efforts to regulate the informed consent process.
CONCLUSION: To ignore this rich and interesting perspective potentially contributes to continued misunderstanding and apathy toward fulfilling the regulatory and ethically obligatory requirements involved in an essential communication process between a clinician-investigator and a potentially vulnerable patient who is considering clinical trial participation.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Abdoler, H. Taylor, and D. Wendler
The Ethics of Phase 0 Oncology Trials
Clin. Cancer Res.,
June 15, 2008;
14(12):
3692 - 3697.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Italiano, C. Massard, R. Bahleda, A.-L. Vataire, E. Deutsch, N. Magne, J.-P. Pignon, G. Vassal, J.-P. Armand, and J.-C. Soria
Treatment outcome and survival in participants of phase I oncology trials carried out from 2003 to 2006 at Institut Gustave Roussy
Ann. Onc.,
April 1, 2008;
19(4):
787 - 792.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Knifed, N. Lipsman, W. Mason, and M. Bernstein
Patients' perception of the informed consent process for neurooncology clinical trials
Neuro-oncol,
January 1, 2008;
10(3):
348 - 354.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Berg
Ethical Challenges in Cancer Research in Children
Oncologist,
November 1, 2007;
12(11):
1336 - 1343.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. W. Gray, F. J. Hlubocky, M. J. Ratain, and C. K. Daugherty
Attitudes Toward Research Participation and Investigator Conflicts of Interest Among Advanced Cancer Patients Participating in Early Phase Clinical Trials
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 10, 2007;
25(23):
3488 - 3494.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. J. Hlubocky, M. J. Ratain, M. Wen, and C. K. Daugherty
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Among Advanced Cancer Patients Enrolled on Phase I Trials: A Study of Prognosis, Quality of Life, and Preferences for Decision Making
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 10, 2007;
25(5):
548 - 554.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. R. Helft and C. K. Daugherty
Are We Taking Without Giving in Return? The Ethics of Research-Related Biopsies and the Benefits of Clinical Trial Participation
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 20, 2006;
24(30):
4793 - 4795.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Agrawal, C. Grady, D. L. Fairclough, N. J. Meropol, K. Maynard, and E. J. Emanuel
Patients' Decision-Making Process Regarding Participation in Phase I Oncology Research
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 20, 2006;
24(27):
4479 - 4484.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. N. Lara Jr, D. A. Paterniti, C. Chiechi, C. Turrell, C. Morain, N. Horan, L. Montell, J. Gonzalez, S. Davis, A. Umutyan, et al.
Evaluation of Factors Affecting Awareness of and Willingness to Participate in Cancer Clinical Trials
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 20, 2005;
23(36):
9282 - 9289.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G Helgesson, J Ludvigsson, and U Gustafsson Stolt
How to handle informed consent in longitudinal studies when participants have a limited understanding of the study
J. Med. Ethics,
November 1, 2005;
31(11):
670 - 673.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S Eriksson and G Helgesson
Keep people informed or leave them alone? A suggested tool for identifying research participants who rightly want only limited information
J. Med. Ethics,
November 1, 2005;
31(11):
674 - 678.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Mosconi, P. Poli, A. Giolo, and G. Apolone
How Italian health consumers feel about clinical research: a questionnaire survey
Eur J Public Health,
August 1, 2005;
15(4):
372 - 379.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. G. Roberts Jr, B. H. Goulart, L. Squitieri, S. C. Stallings, E. F. Halpern, B. A. Chabner, G. S. Gazelle, S. N. Finkelstein, and J. W. Clark
Trends in the Risks and Benefits to Patients With Cancer Participating in Phase 1 Clinical Trials
JAMA,
November 3, 2004;
292(17):
2130 - 2140.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Chang
Nurses' Perceptions of Phase I Clinical Trials in Pediatric Oncology: A Review of the Literature
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing,
November 1, 2004;
21(6):
343 - 349.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. P. Weinfurt
Discursive Versus Information-Processing Perspectives on a Bioethical Problem: The Case of 'Unrealistic' Patient Expectations
Theory Psychology,
April 1, 2004;
14(2):
191 - 203.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. J. Meropol, K. P. Weinfurt, C. B. Burnett, A. Balshem, A. B. Benson III, L. Castel, S. Corbett, M. Diefenbach, D. Gaskin, Y. Li, et al.
Perceptions of Patients and Physicians Regarding Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials: Implications for Physician-Patient Communication
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 1, 2003;
21(13):
2589 - 2596.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. I. Cohen
Clinical Research by Community Oncologists
CA Cancer J Clin,
March 1, 2003;
53(2):
73 - 81.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. A. Treschan, T. Scheck, A. Kober, E. Fleischmann, B. Birkenberg, B. Petschnigg, O. Akca, F. X. Lackner, E. Jandl-Jager, and D. I. Sessler
The Influence of Protocol Pain and Risk on Patients' Willingness to Consent for Clinical Studies: A Randomized Trial
Anesth. Analg.,
February 1, 2003;
96(2):
498 - 506.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Horng, E. J. Emanuel, B. Wilfond, J. Rackoff, K. Martz, and C. Grady
Descriptions of Benefits and Risks in Consent Forms for Phase 1 Oncology Trials
N. Engl. J. Med.,
December 26, 2002;
347(26):
2134 - 2140.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Joffe, E. F. Cook, P. D. Cleary, J. W. Clark, and J. C. Weeks
Quality of Informed Consent: a New Measure of Understanding Among Research Subjects
J Natl Cancer Inst,
January 17, 2001;
93(2):
139 - 147.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. M. P. King
Defining and Describing Benefit Appropriately in Clinical Trials
J. Law Med. Ethics,
December 1, 2000;
28(4):
332 - 343.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. B. Daly, K. Offit, F. Li, G. Glendon, A. Yaker, D. West, B. Koenig, M. McCredie, V. Venne, S. Nayfield, et al.
Participation in the Cooperative Family Registry for Breast Cancer Studies: Issues of Informed Consent
J Natl Cancer Inst,
March 15, 2000;
92(6):
452 - 456.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|