Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Browman, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Browman, G. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 17, Issue 7 (July), 1999: 1969
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Oncology


RAPID PUBLICATIONS

Essence of Evidence-Based Medicine: A Case Report

George P. Browman

From the Program in Evidence-Based Care, Cancer Care Ontario, and Health Information Research Unit, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Address reprint requests to George P. Browman, MD, Health Information Research Unit, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, 1200 Main St West, Room 3H7, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To illustrate the complexities of the evidence-based approach in clinical oncology practice and the implications for guidelines and evaluation of processes of care.

PATIENT AND METHODS: A case report is presented in which a limited systematic review of the literature was used to address a specific clinical problem in an individual patient. Experts' opinions were also sought.

RESULTS: A reasonable clinical decision was made by a participating patient based on indirect evidence of benefit that would be insufficient to support the same decision as a health policy in some jurisdictions.

CONCLUSION: The practice of evidence-based oncology requires clinical judgment about the validity and applicability of research evidence. The factors that influence an evidence-based decision in the clinical context differ from those in the broader policy context, which could lead to legitimate differences in recommendations based on the same information. Used properly, the individual case report can be a powerful tool to illustrate complex clinical decision phenomena.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
G. P. Browman
Development and Aftercare of Clinical Guidelines: The Balance Between Rigor and Pragmatism
JAMA, September 26, 2001; 286(12): 1509 - 1511.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1999 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online