Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 17, Issue 7
(July), 1999: 2039
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Cytokines in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Is It Useful to Switch to Interleukin-2 or Interferon After Failure of a First Treatment?
Bernard Escudier,
Christine Chevreau,
Christine Lasset,
Jean Yves Douillard,
Alain Ravaud,
Michel Fabbro,
Armelle Caty,
Jean Francois Rossi,
Patrice Viens,
Jean Pierre Bergerat,
Jacqueline Savary,
Sylvie Négrier,
for the Groupe Français d'Immunothérapie
From the Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Centre Claudius Régaud, Toulouse; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; Centre Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; CHU, Montpellier; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; and CHU, Strasbourg, France.
Address reprint requests to Bernard Escudier, MD, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, France; email escudier{at}igr.fr
PURPOSE: Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon alfa-2a (IFN 2a) have some antitumor activity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma either alone or in combination. To determine whether either of these cytokines might be efficient after failure of the other, we analyzed a series of patients treated with either IL-2 or IFN 2a as second-line treatment after failure of the other cytokine.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recently performed a large multicenter study to determine the respective efficacy of IL-2, IFN 2a, or combined treatment in renal cell carcinoma. In this study, patients who progressed on the single-arm treatment could receive the other cytokine in a cross-over trial. IL-2 was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion for 5 days (18 x 106 IU/m2/d), and IFN 2a was administered three times weekly at 18 x 106 IU.
RESULTS: A total of 113 patients with progressive disease after first-line treatment received either IFN 2a (n = 48) or IL-2 (n = 65). Toxicity during second-line treatment was similar to that observed during first-line treatment. Only four partial responses were observed (one with IFN 2a and three with IL-2). All partial responders had a performance status of 0 and lung metastases. Moreover, three of these four patients had stable disease or had responded to first-line therapy. Only one patient with confirmed disease progression after receiving IL-2 subsequently responded to IFN 2a.
CONCLUSION: Cross-over after failure of IL-2 or IFN 2a is poorly efficient in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, especially when progression has been clearly documented.
The Groupe Français d'Immunothérapie is part of the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer; the names of additional investigators are listed in the Appendix.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. L. Goodman, E. P. Rock, R. Dagher, R. P. Ramchandani, S. Abraham, J. V.S. Gobburu, B. P. Booth, S. L. Verbois, D. E. Morse, C. Y. Liang, et al.
Approval Summary: Sunitinib for the Treatment of Imatinib Refractory or Intolerant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res.,
March 1, 2007;
13(5):
1367 - 1373.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Escudier, T. Eisen, W. M. Stadler, C. Szczylik, S. Oudard, M. Siebels, S. Negrier, C. Chevreau, E. Solska, A. A. Desai, et al.
Sorafenib in Advanced Clear-Cell Renal-Cell Carcinoma
N. Engl. J. Med.,
January 11, 2007;
356(2):
125 - 134.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. C. Kane, A. T. Farrell, H. Saber, S. Tang, G. Williams, J. M. Jee, C. Liang, B. Booth, N. Chidambaram, D. Morse, et al.
Sorafenib for the Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res.,
December 15, 2006;
12(24):
7271 - 7278.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Parton, M. Gore, and T. Eisen
Role of Cytokine Therapy in 2006 and Beyond for Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 10, 2006;
24(35):
5584 - 5592.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Motzer and R. M. Bukowski
Targeted Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 10, 2006;
24(35):
5601 - 5608.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Motzer, B. I. Rini, R. M. Bukowski, B. D. Curti, D. J. George, G. R. Hudes, B. G. Redman, K. A. Margolin, J. R. Merchan, G. Wilding, et al.
Sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
JAMA,
June 7, 2006;
295(21):
2516 - 2524.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Motzer, M. D. Michaelson, B. G. Redman, G. R. Hudes, G. Wilding, R. A. Figlin, M. S. Ginsberg, S. T. Kim, C. M. Baum, S. E. DePrimo, et al.
Activity of SU11248, a Multitargeted Inhibitor of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor and Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor, in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 1, 2006;
24(1):
16 - 24.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Viey, G. Fromont, B. Escudier, Y. Morel, S. Da Rocha, S. Chouaib, and A. Caignard
Phosphostim-Activated {gamma}{delta} T Cells Kill Autologous Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
J. Immunol.,
February 1, 2005;
174(3):
1338 - 1347.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Pandha
Integrative Tumor Board: Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Integr Cancer Ther,
March 1, 2004;
3(1):
29 - 34.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Motzer, J. Bacik, L. H. Schwartz, V. Reuter, P. Russo, S. Marion, and M. Mazumdar
Prognostic Factors for Survival in Previously Treated Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 1, 2004;
22(3):
454 - 463.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Bukowski, M. S. Ernstoff, M. E. Gore, J. J. Nemunaitis, R. Amato, S. K. Gupta, and C. L. Tendler
Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2b Treatment for Patients With Solid Tumors: A Phase I/II Study
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 15, 2002;
20(18):
3841 - 3949.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|