This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van Oostenbrugge, R. J. Articles by Twijnstra, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van Oostenbrugge, R. J. Articles by Twijnstra, A. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Treatment of Leptomeningeal Metastases Evaluated by Interphase Cytogenetics

From the Departments of Neurology and Pathology, University Hospital of Maastricht, and Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Address reprint requests to R.J. van Oostenbrugge, MD, PhD, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Maastricht, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands; email rvoo{at}sneu.azm.nl

PURPOSE: Although cytologic examination of CSF is the primary method for the evaluation of response to therapy for leptomeningeal metastases (LMMs), the procedure’s sensitivity decreases throughout the course of protracted therapy. We studied whether this response could be monitored more accurately through the detection of numerical chromosomal aberrations by interphase cytogenetics, using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven patients treated for LMMs and with a known numerical aberration for chromosome 1 in their pretreatment CSF were included in this study. Up to 16 consecutive CSF samples were analyzed by means of the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique for cells with aberrant chromosome 1 content. The results of routine cytology and FISH analyses were compared and were correlated with each patient’s neurologic status.

RESULTS: Routine cytology detected malignancies in only 24 of the 76 samples, all of which were classified as chromosomally abnormal by FISH (except for two samples that could not be evaluated). Moreover, FISH demonstrated aneusomic cells in 32 additional samples, which could therefore be classified as malignant. The FISH results correlated better with patient neurologic status in that more malignant cells were detected in the CSF of neurologically deteriorating patients.

CONCLUSION: Using FISH in addition to performing routine cytologic examination of CSF led to a more accurate evaluation of response to treatment in patients treated for LMMs.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Fiegl, M. Haun, A. Massoner, J. Krugmann, E. Muller-Holzner, R. Hack, W. Hilbe, C. Marth, H.-C. Duba, G. Gastl, et al. Combination of Cytology, Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Aneuploidy, and Reverse-Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction for Human Mammaglobin/Mammaglobin B Expression Improves Diagnosis of Malignant Effusions J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2004; 22(3): 474 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Varella-Garcia Molecular Cytogenetics in Solid Tumors: Laboratorial Tool for Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapy Oncologist, February 1, 2003; 8(1): 45 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]