Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Robert, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Robert, N. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 18, Issue 10 (May), 2000: 2059-2069
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Prognostic Value of Histologic Grade and Proliferative Activity in Axillary Node–Positive Breast Cancer: Results From the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Companion Study, EST 4189

By Jean F. Simpson, Robert Gray, Lynn G. Dressler, Charles D. Cobau, Carla I. Falkson, Kennedy W. Gilchrist, Kishan J. Pandya, David L. Page, Nicholas J. Robert

From the Department of Pathology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Flower Memorial Hospital, Sylvania, OH; University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, WI; University of Rochester Cancer Center, Rochester, NY; and Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA.

Address reprint requests to Jean F. Simpson, MD, Department of Pathology, MCN C3321, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232.

PURPOSE: The identification of a subset of patients with axillary lymph node–positive breast cancer with an improved prognosis would be clinically useful. We report the prognostic importance of histologic grading and proliferative activity in a cohort of patients with axillary lymph node–positive breast cancer and compare these parameters with other established prognostic factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: This Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group laboratory companion study (E4189) centered on 560 axillary lymph node–positive patients registered onto one of six eligible clinical protocols. Flow cytometric (ploidy and S-phase fraction [SPF]) and histopathologic analyses (Nottingham Combined Histologic Grade and mitotic index) were performed on paraffin-embedded tissue from 368 patients.

RESULTS: Disease recurred in 208 patients; in 161 (77%), within the first 5 years. Mitotic index and grade were associated with both ploidy and SPF (P <= .01). Within the first 5 years of follow-up, mitotic index (P = .004), grade (P = .004), ploidy (P = .006), and SPF (P = .05) were associated with time to recurrence; there was also a significant association with survival. The effect of mitotic index was largely a result of the difference between 0 to 2 mitoses/10 high-power fields (HPF; 5-year recurrence of 31%) and more than 2 mitoses/10 HPF (5-year recurrence of 52%). The 0 to 2 mitoses/10 HPF group was independently associated with improved prognosis at 5 years (P = .002) in regression models that included other standard prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION: A subset of axillary lymph node–positive patients with improved prognosis may be identified using a lower (< 3 mitoses/10 HPF) mitotic count than is usually performed.

Conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (Robert L. Comis, MD, Chair) and supported in part by Public Health Service grants no. CA49957, CA23318, CA59307, CA21076, CA11083, CA66636, and CA21115 from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
F. Penault-Llorca, C. Abrial, I. Raoelfils, P. Chollet, A. Cayre, M.-A. Mouret-Reynier, E. Thivat, F. Mishellany, P. Gimbergues, and X. Durando
Changes and Predictive and Prognostic Value of the Mitotic Index, Ki-67, Cyclin D1, and Cyclo-oxygenase-2 in 710 Operable Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Oncologist, December 1, 2008; 13(12): 1235 - 1245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. Colozza, E. Azambuja, F. Cardoso, C. Sotiriou, D. Larsimont, and M. J. Piccart
Proliferative markers as prognostic and predictive tools in early breast cancer: where are we now?
Ann. Onc., November 1, 2005; 16(11): 1723 - 1739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
H. Dai, L. van't Veer, J. Lamb, Y. D. He, M. Mao, B. M. Fine, R. Bernards, M. van de Vijver, P. Deutsch, A. Sachs, et al.
A Cell Proliferation Signature Is a Marker of Extremely Poor Outcome in a Subpopulation of Breast Cancer Patients
Cancer Res., May 15, 2005; 65(10): 4059 - 4066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
F. Andre, A. Khalil, K. Slimane, C. Massard, M. C. Mathieu, S. Vignot, H. Assi, S. Delaloge, and M. Spielmann
Mitotic Index and Benefit of Adjuvant Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy in Patients With Early Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2005; 23(13): 2996 - 3000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
P J van Diest, E van der Wall, and J P A Baak
Prognostic value of proliferation in invasive breast cancer: a review
J. Clin. Pathol., July 1, 2004; 57(7): 675 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
T J Anderson
Breast cancer prognostication in the 21st century and the Nottingham prognostic index
J. Clin. Pathol., February 1, 2002; 55(2): 86 - 87.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
S Frkovic-Grazio and M Bracko
Long term prognostic value of Nottingham histological grade and its components in early (pT1N0M0) breast carcinoma
J. Clin. Pathol., February 1, 2002; 55(2): 88 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
M. G. Daidone and R. Silvestrini
Prognostic and Predictive Role of Proliferation Indices in Adjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, December 1, 2001; 2001(30): 27 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Chassevent, M.-L. Jourdan, S. Romain, F. Descotes, M. Colonna, P.-M. Martin, M. Bolla, and F. Spyratos
S-Phase Fraction and DNA Ploidy in 633 T1T2 Breast Cancers: A Standardized Flow Cytometric Study
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2001; 7(4): 909 - 917.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online