Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 18, Issue 10
(May), 2000: 2059-2069
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Prognostic Value of Histologic Grade and Proliferative Activity in Axillary NodePositive Breast Cancer: Results From the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Companion Study, EST 4189
By Jean F. Simpson,
Robert Gray,
Lynn G. Dressler,
Charles D. Cobau,
Carla I. Falkson,
Kennedy W. Gilchrist,
Kishan J. Pandya,
David L. Page,
Nicholas J. Robert
From the Department of Pathology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Flower Memorial Hospital, Sylvania, OH; University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, WI; University of Rochester Cancer Center, Rochester, NY; and Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA.
Address reprint requests to Jean F. Simpson, MD, Department of Pathology, MCN C3321, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232.
PURPOSE: The identification of a subset of patients with axillary lymph nodepositive breast cancer with an improved prognosis would be clinically useful. We report the prognostic importance of histologic grading and proliferative activity in a cohort of patients with axillary lymph nodepositive breast cancer and compare these parameters with other established prognostic factors.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group laboratory companion study (E4189) centered on 560 axillary lymph nodepositive patients registered onto one of six eligible clinical protocols. Flow cytometric (ploidy and S-phase fraction [SPF]) and histopathologic analyses (Nottingham Combined Histologic Grade and mitotic index) were performed on paraffin-embedded tissue from 368 patients.
RESULTS: Disease recurred in 208 patients; in 161 (77%), within the first 5 years. Mitotic index and grade were associated with both ploidy and SPF (P .01). Within the first 5 years of follow-up, mitotic index (P = .004), grade (P = .004), ploidy (P = .006), and SPF (P = .05) were associated with time to recurrence; there was also a significant association with survival. The effect of mitotic index was largely a result of the difference between 0 to 2 mitoses/10 high-power fields (HPF; 5-year recurrence of 31%) and more than 2 mitoses/10 HPF (5-year recurrence of 52%). The 0 to 2 mitoses/10 HPF group was independently associated with improved prognosis at 5 years (P = .002) in regression models that included other standard prognostic factors.
CONCLUSION: A subset of axillary lymph nodepositive patients with improved prognosis may be identified using a lower (< 3 mitoses/10 HPF) mitotic count than is usually performed.
Conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (Robert L. Comis, MD, Chair) and supported in part by Public Health Service grants no. CA49957, CA23318, CA59307, CA21076, CA11083, CA66636, and CA21115 from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Penault-Llorca, C. Abrial, I. Raoelfils, P. Chollet, A. Cayre, M.-A. Mouret-Reynier, E. Thivat, F. Mishellany, P. Gimbergues, and X. Durando
Changes and Predictive and Prognostic Value of the Mitotic Index, Ki-67, Cyclin D1, and Cyclo-oxygenase-2 in 710 Operable Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Oncologist,
December 1, 2008;
13(12):
1235 - 1245.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Colozza, E. Azambuja, F. Cardoso, C. Sotiriou, D. Larsimont, and M. J. Piccart
Proliferative markers as prognostic and predictive tools in early breast cancer: where are we now?
Ann. Onc.,
November 1, 2005;
16(11):
1723 - 1739.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Dai, L. van't Veer, J. Lamb, Y. D. He, M. Mao, B. M. Fine, R. Bernards, M. van de Vijver, P. Deutsch, A. Sachs, et al.
A Cell Proliferation Signature Is a Marker of Extremely Poor Outcome in a Subpopulation of Breast Cancer Patients
Cancer Res.,
May 15, 2005;
65(10):
4059 - 4066.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Andre, A. Khalil, K. Slimane, C. Massard, M. C. Mathieu, S. Vignot, H. Assi, S. Delaloge, and M. Spielmann
Mitotic Index and Benefit of Adjuvant Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy in Patients With Early Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 1, 2005;
23(13):
2996 - 3000.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P J van Diest, E van der Wall, and J P A Baak
Prognostic value of proliferation in invasive breast cancer: a review
J. Clin. Pathol.,
July 1, 2004;
57(7):
675 - 681.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T J Anderson
Breast cancer prognostication in the 21st century and the Nottingham prognostic index
J. Clin. Pathol.,
February 1, 2002;
55(2):
86 - 87.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S Frkovic-Grazio and M Bracko
Long term prognostic value of Nottingham histological grade and its components in early (pT1N0M0) breast carcinoma
J. Clin. Pathol.,
February 1, 2002;
55(2):
88 - 92.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. G. Daidone and R. Silvestrini
Prognostic and Predictive Role of Proliferation Indices in Adjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs,
December 1, 2001;
2001(30):
27 - 35.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Chassevent, M.-L. Jourdan, S. Romain, F. Descotes, M. Colonna, P.-M. Martin, M. Bolla, and F. Spyratos
S-Phase Fraction and DNA Ploidy in 633 T1T2 Breast Cancers: A Standardized Flow Cytometric Study
Clin. Cancer Res.,
April 1, 2001;
7(4):
909 - 917.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|