Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 18, Issue 12
(June), 2000: 2468-2475
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Oral Paclitaxel
By Mirte M. Malingré,
Jetske M. Meerum Terwogt,
Jos H. Beijnen,
Hilde Rosing,
Franciska J. Koopman,
Olaf van Tellingen,
Ken Duchin,
Wim W. Ten Bokkel Huinink,
Martha Swart,
Jan Lieverst,
Jan H. M. Schellens
From the Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, and Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam; Division of Drug Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Baker Norton Pharmaceuticals, Miami, FL.
Address reprint requests to Mirte M. Malingré, PharmD, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Slotervaart Hospital, Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Louwesweg 6, 1066 EC Amsterdam, the Netherlands; email apmmg{at}slz.nl
PURPOSE: To investigate dose escalation of oral paclitaxel in combination with dose increment and scheduling of cyclosporine (CsA) to improve the systemic exposure to paclitaxel and to explore the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 53 patients received, on one occasion, oral paclitaxel in combination with CsA, coadministered to enhance the absorption of paclitaxel, and, on another occasion, intravenous paclitaxel at a dose of 175 mg/m2 as a 3-hour infusion.
RESULTS: The main toxicities observed after oral intake of paclitaxel were acute nausea and vomiting, which reached DLT at the dose level of 360 mg/m2. Dose escalation of oral paclitaxel from 60 to 300 mg/m2 resulted in significant but less than proportional increases in the plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of paclitaxel. The mean AUC values ± SD after 60, 180, and 300 mg/m2 of oral paclitaxel were 1.65 ± 0.93, 3.33 ± 2.39, and 3.46 ± 1.37 µmol/L·h, respectively. Dose increment and scheduling of CsA did not result in a further increase in the AUC of paclitaxel. The AUC of intravenous paclitaxel was 15.39 ± 3.26 µmol/L·h.
CONCLUSION: The MTD of oral paclitaxel was 300 mg/m2. However, because the pharmacokinetic data of oral paclitaxel, in particular at the highest doses applied, revealed nonlinear pharmacokinetics with only a moderate further increase of the AUC with doses up to 300 mg/m2, the oral paclitaxel dose of 180 mg/m2 in combination with 15 mg/kg oral CsA is considered most appropriate for further investigation. The safety of the oral combination at this dose level was good.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Hennenfent and R. Govindan
Novel formulations of taxanes: a review. Old wine in a new bottle?
Ann. Onc.,
May 1, 2006;
17(5):
735 - 749.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Joerger, A. D.R. Huitema, D. H.J.G. van den Bongard, J. H.M. Schellens, and J. H. Beijnen
Quantitative effect of gender, age, liver function, and body size on the population pharmacokinetics of Paclitaxel in patients with solid tumors.
Clin. Cancer Res.,
April 1, 2006;
12(7 Pt 1):
2150 - 2157.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. E. Broker, F. Y.F.L. de Vos, C. J. van Groeningen, B. C. Kuenen, H. E. Gall, M. H. Woo, M. Voi, J. A. Gietema, E. G.E. de Vries, and G. Giaccone
Phase I Trial with BMS-275183, a Novel Oral Taxane with Promising Antitumor Activity.
Clin. Cancer Res.,
March 15, 2006;
12(6):
1760 - 1767.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Chester, S. P. Joel, S. L. Cheeseman, G. D. Hall, M. S. Braun, J. Perry, T. Davis, C. J. Button, and M. T. Seymour
Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Intravenous Irinotecan Plus Oral Ciclosporin in Patients With Fluorouracil-Refractory Metastatic Colon Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 15, 2003;
21(6):
1125 - 1132.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. F. Kruijtzer, H. Boot, J. H. Beijnen, H. L. Lochs, F. X. Parnis, A. S. T. Planting, J. M. G. Pelgrims, R. Williams, R. A. A. Mathot, H. Rosing, et al.
Weekly oral paclitaxel as first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer
Ann. Onc.,
February 1, 2003;
14(2):
197 - 204.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Gibbons, M. Oluwatuyi, and G. W. Kaatz
A novel inhibitor of multidrug efflux pumps in Staphylococcus aureus
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.,
January 1, 2003;
51(1):
13 - 17.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.M.F. Kruijtzer, J.H.M. Schellens, J. Mezger, M.E. Scheulen, U. Keilholz, J.H. Beijnen, H. Rosing, R.A.A. Mathot, S. Marcus, H. van Tinteren, et al.
Phase II and Pharmacologic Study of Weekly Oral Paclitaxel Plus Cyclosporine in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 1, 2002;
20(23):
4508 - 4516.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.M.F. Kruijtzer, J.H. Beijnen, and J.H.M. Schellens
Improvement of Oral Drug Treatment by Temporary Inhibition of Drug Transporters and/or Cytochrome P450 in the Gastrointestinal Tract and Liver: An Overview
Oncologist,
December 1, 2002;
7(6):
516 - 530.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. M. McDaid and S. B. Horwitz
Selective Potentiation of Paclitaxel (Taxol)-Induced Cell Death by Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase Inhibition in Human Cancer Cell Lines
Mol. Pharmacol.,
August 1, 2001;
60(2):
290 - 301.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. H. Kang, W. D. Figg, Y. Ando, M. V. Blagosklonny, D. Liewehr, T. Fojo, and S. E. Bates
The P-Glycoprotein Antagonist PSC 833 Increases the Plasma Concentrations of 6{{alpha}}-Hydroxypaclitaxel, a Major Metabolite of Paclitaxel
Clin. Cancer Res.,
June 1, 2001;
7(6):
1610 - 1617.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Egorin
Adenosine Triphosphate-Binding Cassette Proteins and Bioavailability: "We Can Pump You Up (or Out)"
J Natl Cancer Inst,
October 18, 2000;
92(20):
1628 - 1629.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|