Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 18, Issue 14
(July), 2000: 2718-2727
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil Versus Tamoxifen Plus Ovarian Suppression as Adjuvant Treatment of Estrogen ReceptorPositive Pre-/Perimenopausal Breast Cancer Patients: Results of the Italian Breast Cancer Adjuvant Study Group 02 Randomized Trial
By F. Boccardo,
A. Rubagotti,
D. Amoroso,
M. Mesiti,
D. Romeo,
P. Sismondi,
M. Giai,
F. Genta,
P. Pacini ,
V. Distante,
A. Bolognesi,
D. Aldrighetti,
A. Farris,
for the Italian Breast Cancer Adjuvant Study Group
From the Professorial Unit of Medical Oncology and Biostatistics Unit, University and National Cancer Institute, Genoa; Institute of Oncology, University of Messina, Messina; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University and Mauriziano Hospital, Torino; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, SantAnna Gynecologic Hospital, Turin; Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Careggi; Department of Surgery, University of Florence, Florence; Department of OncologyRadiotherapy, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan; and Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Deceased.
Address reprint requests to Francesco Boccardo, MD, Professorial Unit of Medical Oncology, University and National Cancer Institute, Largo R. Benzi 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy; email boccardo{at}hp380.ist.unige.it
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of chemotherapy versus that of tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression in pre-/perimenopausal estrogen receptorpositive patients with early breast cancer.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either six cycles of a standard regimen of cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally days 1 to 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) days 1 and 8, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 IV days 1 and 8 (CMF), with all drugs restarted on day 29, or 5 years of tamoxifen, 30 mg/d, plus ovarian suppression with surgical oophorectomy, ovarian irradiation, or monthly goserelin 3.6-mg injections. Disease-free survival was the main study end point. Overall survival and toxicity were additional end points.
RESULTS: Between 1989 and 1997, 120 patients were assigned to CMF and 124 to tamoxifen and ovarian suppression (oophorectomy, n = 6; ovarian irradiation, n = 31; and goserelin injections, n = 87). At the time of analysis (median follow-up time, 76 months; range, 9 to 121 months), 82 patients had relapsed and 39 had died. No difference between groups had emerged with respect to either disease-free or overall survival. Treatments were comparable even in respect to age, tumor size, and nodal status, although a nonsignificant trend favored patients with poorly differentiated tumors treated with CMF. Leukopenia, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, and alopecia were significantly more common in patients treated with CMF. There were few patients who developed benign gynecologic changes in either group, and numbers were comparable.
CONCLUSION: The combination of tamoxifen with ovarian suppression seems to be safe and to yield comparable results relative to standard CMF.
Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Los Angeles, CA, May 1619, 1998.
See Appendix for a complete list of study participants.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Schmid, M. Untch, V. Kosse, G. Bondar, L. Vassiljev, V. Tarutinov, U. Lehmann, L. Maubach, J. Meurer, D. Wallwiener, et al.
Leuprorelin Acetate Every-3-Months Depot Versus Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil As Adjuvant Treatment in Premenopausal Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer: The TABLE Study
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 20, 2007;
25(18):
2509 - 2515.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Wolff and N. E. Davidson
Still Waiting After 110 Years: The Optimal Use of Ovarian Ablation As Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 1, 2006;
24(31):
4949 - 4951.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S Aebi and M Castiglione
The enigma of young age.
Ann. Onc.,
October 1, 2006;
17(10):
1475 - 1477.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Roche, P. Kerbrat, J. Bonneterre, P. Fargeot, P. Fumoleau, A. Monnier, P. Clavere, M.-J. Goudier, P. Chollet, J.-P. Guastalla, et al.
Complete hormonal blockade versus epirubicin-based chemotherapy in premenopausal, one to three node-positive, and hormone-receptor positive, early breast cancer patients: 7-year follow-up results of French Adjuvant Study Group 06 randomised trial
Ann. Onc.,
August 1, 2006;
17(8):
1221 - 1227.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Colozza, E. de Azambuja, F. Cardoso, C. Bernard, and M. J. Piccart
Breast cancer: achievements in adjuvant systemic therapies in the pre-genomic era.
Oncologist,
February 1, 2006;
11(2):
111 - 125.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. E. Krop and E. P. Winer
Ovarian Suppression for Breast Cancer: An Effective Treatment in Search of a Home
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 1, 2005;
23(25):
5869 - 5872.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. E. Davidson, A. M. O'Neill, A. M. Vukov, C. K. Osborne, S. Martino, D. R. White, and M. D. Abeloff
Chemoendocrine Therapy for Premenopausal Women With Axillary Lymph Node-Positive, Steroid Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Results From INT 0101 (E5188)
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 1, 2005;
23(25):
5973 - 5982.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Dellapasqua, M. Colleoni, R. D. Gelber, and A. Goldhirsch
Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Premenopausal Women With Early Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 10, 2005;
23(8):
1736 - 1750.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Arriagada, M. G. Le, M. Spielmann, L. Mauriac, J. Bonneterre, M. Namer, T. Delozier, C. Hill, and T. Tursz
Randomized trial of adjuvant ovarian suppression in 926 premenopausal patients with early breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy
Ann. Onc.,
March 1, 2005;
16(3):
389 - 396.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Sverrisdottir, T. Fornander, H. Jacobsson, E. von Schoultz, and L.E. Rutqvist
Bone Mineral Density Among Premenopausal Women With Early Breast Cancer in a Randomized Trial of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 15, 2004;
22(18):
3694 - 3699.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L Jones and A. U Buzdar
A review of adjuvant hormonal therapy in breast cancer
Endocr. Relat. Cancer,
September 1, 2004;
11(3):
391 - 406.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N Angelopoulos, V Barbounis, S Livadas, D Kaltsas, and G Tolis
Effects of estrogen deprivation due to breast cancer treatment
Endocr. Relat. Cancer,
September 1, 2004;
11(3):
523 - 535.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. R. Love and J. E. Niederhuber
Models of Breast Cancer Growth and Investigations of Adjuvant Surgical Oophorectomy
Ann. Surg. Oncol.,
September 1, 2004;
11(9):
818 - 828.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Prowell and N. E. Davidson
What Is the Role of Ovarian Ablation in the Management of Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer Today?
Oncologist,
September 1, 2004;
9(5):
507 - 517.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Pater and W. R. Parulekar
Ovarian Ablation as Adjuvant Therapy for Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer--Another Step Forward
J Natl Cancer Inst,
December 17, 2003;
95(24):
1811 - 1812.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
International Breast Cancer Study Group
Adjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Goserelin Versus Either Modality Alone for Premenopausal Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer: A Randomized Trial
J Natl Cancer Inst,
December 17, 2003;
95(24):
1833 - 1846.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. A. Emens and N. E. Davidson
Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy for Premenopausal Women with Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res.,
January 1, 2003;
9(1):
486S - 494S.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. I. Pritchard
Adjuvant Therapy for Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer: Is It Time for Another Paradigm Shift?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 15, 2002;
20(24):
4611 - 4614.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Jakesz, H. Hausmaninger, E. Kubista, M. Gnant, C. Menzel, T. Bauernhofer, M. Seifert, K. Haider, B. Mlineritsch, P. Steindorfer, et al.
Randomized Adjuvant Trial of Tamoxifen and Goserelin Versus Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil: Evidence for the Superiority of Treatment With Endocrine Blockade in Premenopausal Patients With Hormone-Responsive Breast Cancer--Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Trial 5
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 15, 2002;
20(24):
4621 - 4627.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Jonat, M. Kaufmann, W. Sauerbrei, R. Blamey, J. Cuzick, M. Namer, I. Fogelman, J. C. de Haes, A. de Matteis, A. Stewart, et al.
Goserelin Versus Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil as Adjuvant Therapy in Premenopausal Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer: The Zoladex Early Breast Cancer Research Association Study
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 15, 2002;
20(24):
4628 - 4635.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Di Leo and M. Buyse
Equivalence Between Ovarian Suppression and Chemotherapy in the Adjuvant Treatment of Endocrine-Responsive Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 1, 2002;
20(7):
1954 - 1955.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Goldhirsch, R. D. Gelber, G. Yothers, R. J. Gray, S. Green, J. Bryant, S. Gelber, M. Castiglione-Gertsch, and A. S. Coates
Adjuvant Therapy for Very Young Women With Breast Cancer: Need for Tailored Treatments
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs,
December 1, 2001;
2001(30):
44 - 51.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. E. Davidson
Ovarian Ablation as Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs,
December 1, 2001;
2001(30):
67 - 71.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Boehnke Michaud, K. L. Jones, and A. U. Buzdar
Combination Endocrine Therapy in the Management of Breast Cancer
Oncologist,
December 1, 2001;
6(6):
538 - 546.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Goldhirsch, J. H. Glick, R. D. Gelber, A. S. Coates, and H.-J. Senn
Meeting Highlights: International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 15, 2001;
19(18):
3817 - 3827.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|