This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Avril, N. Articles by Schwaiger, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Avril, N. Articles by Schwaiger, M. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Breast Imaging With Positron Emission Tomography and Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose: Use and Limitations

From the Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Gynecology, Technische Universität München, Munich; and Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Address reprint requests to Norbert Avril, MD, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstr 22, 81675 München, Germany; email n.avril{at}lrz.tu-muenchen.de

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) for the diagnosis of primary breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Preoperatively, 144 patients with masses suggestive of breast cancer underwent PET imaging of the breast. To identify breast cancer by increased metabolic activity, parametric FDG-PET images were analyzed for increased tracer uptake applying conventional image reading (CIR) and sensitive image reading (SIR). One hundred eighty-five breast tumors were evaluated by histology, revealing 132 breast carcinomas and 53 benign masses.

RESULTS: Breast carcinomas were identified with an overall sensitivity of 64.4% (CIR) and 80.3% (SIR). The increase in sensitivity (SIR) resulted in a noticeable decrease in specificity, from 94.3% (CIR) to 75.5% (SIR). At stage pT1, only 30 (68.2%) of 44 breast carcinomas were detected, compared with 57 (91.9%) of 62 at stage pT2. A higher percentage of invasive lobular carcinomas were false-negative (65.2%) compared with invasive ductal carcinomas (23.7%). Nevertheless, positive PET scans provided a high positive-predictive value (96.6%) for breast cancer.

CONCLUSION: Partial volume effects and varying metabolic activity (dependent on tumor type) seem to represent the most significant limitations for the routine diagnostic application of PET. The number of invasive procedures is therefore unlikely to be significantly reduced by PET imaging in patients presenting with abnormal mammography. However, the high positive-predictive value, resulting from the increased metabolic activity of malignant tissue, may be used with carefully selected subsets of patients as well as to determine the extent of disease or to assess therapy response.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. FERRARA Nuclear Imaging In Breast Cancer Radiol. Technol., January 1, 2010; 81(3): 233 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. MacDonald, J. Edwards, T. Lewellen, D. Haseley, J. Rogers, and P. Kinahan Clinical Imaging Characteristics of the Positron Emission Mammography Camera: PEM Flex Solo II J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2009; 50(10): 1666 - 1675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L. Bowen, Y. Wu, A. J. Chaudhari, L. Fu, N. J. Packard, G. W. Burkett, K. Yang, K. K. Lindfors, D. K. Shelton, R. Hagge, et al. Initial Characterization of a Dedicated Breast PET/CT Scanner During Human Imaging J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2009; 50(9): 1401 - 1408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Carkaci, H. A. Macapinlac, M. Cristofanilli, O. Mawlawi, E. Rohren, A. M. Gonzalez Angulo, S. Dawood, E. Resetkova, H. T. Le-Petross, and W.-T. Yang Retrospective Study of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Diagnosis of Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Preliminary Data J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2009; 50(2): 231 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Imbriaco, M. G. Caprio, G. Limite, L. Pace, T. De Falco, E. Capuano, and M. Salvatore Dual-Time-Point 18F-FDG PET/CT Versus Dynamic Breast MRI of Suspicious Breast Lesions Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): 1323 - 1330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A. Heusner, S. Kuemmel, L. Umutlu, A. Koeninger, L. S. Freudenberg, E. A.M. Hauth, K. R. Kimmig, M. Forsting, A. Bockisch, and G. Antoch Breast Cancer Staging in a Single Session: Whole-Body PET/CT Mammography J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 1215 - 1222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Mahner, S. Schirrmacher, W. Brenner, L. Jenicke, C. R. Habermann, N. Avril, and J. Dose-Schwarz Comparison between positron emission tomography using 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose, conventional imaging and computed tomography for staging of breast cancer Ann. Onc., July 1, 2008; 19(7): 1249 - 1254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Basu and A. Alavi Feasibility of Automated Partial-Volume Correction of SUVs in Current PET/CT Scanners: Can Manufacturers Provide Integrated, Ready-to-Use Software? J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 1031 - 1032. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Masciari, A. D. Van den Abbeele, L. R. Diller, I. Rastarhuyeva, J. Yap, K. Schneider, L. Digianni, F. P. Li, J. F. Fraumeni Jr, S. Syngal, et al. F18-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Screening in Li-Fraumeni Syndrome JAMA, March 19, 2008; 299(11): 1315 - 1319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. C. Hodgson and K. Y. Gulenchyn Is There a Role for Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer Staging? J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 712 - 720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. A. Margolis, J. M. Hoffman, R. J. Herfkens, R. B. Jeffrey, A. Quon, and S. S. Gambhir Molecular Imaging Techniques in Body Imaging Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 333 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. S. Lim, W. Yoon, T. W. Chung, J. K. Kim, J. G. Park, H. K. Kang, H. S. Bom, and J. H. Yoon FDG PET/CT for the Detection and Evaluation of Breast Diseases: Usefulness and Limitations RadioGraphics, October 1, 2007; 27(suppl_1): S197 - S213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B Vincenzi, A Calvieri, D Santini, V Altomare, and G Tonini Occasional FDG PET recognition of in situ breast cancer Ann. Onc., September 1, 2007; 18(9): 1584 - 1585. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. K. Kuhl Current Status of Breast MR Imaging * Part 2. Clinical Applications Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 672 - 691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Kuhl The Current Status of Breast MR Imaging * Part I. Choice of Technique, Image Interpretation, Diagnostic Accuracy, and Transfer to Clinical Practice Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 356 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Mavi, T. F. Cermik, M. Urhan, H. Puskulcu, S. Basu, J. Q. Yu, H. Zhuang, B. Czerniecki, and A. Alavi The Effects of Estrogen, Progesterone, and C-erbB-2 Receptor States on 18F-FDG Uptake of Primary Breast Cancer Lesions J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2007; 48(8): 1266 - 1272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Moy, F. Ponzo, M. E. Noz, G. Q. Maguire Jr., A. D. Murphy-Walcott, A. E. Deans, M. T. Kitazono, L. Travascio, and E. L. Kramer Improving Specificity of Breast MRI Using Prone PET and Fused MRI and PET 3D Volume Datasets J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 528 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Blodgett, C. C. Meltzer, and D. W. Townsend PET/CT: Form and Function Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 360 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Rousseau, A. Devillers, C. Sagan, L. Ferrer, B. Bridji, L. Campion, M. Ricaud, E. Bourbouloux, I. Doutriaux, M. Clouet, et al. Monitoring of Early Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II and III Breast Cancer by [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2006; 24(34): 5366 - 5372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Mavi, M. Urhan, J. Q. Yu, H. Zhuang, M. Houseni, T. F. Cermik, D. Thiruvenkatasamy, B. Czerniecki, M. Schnall, and A. Alavi Dual Time Point 18F-FDG PET Imaging Detects Breast Cancer with High Sensitivity and Correlates Well with Histologic Subtypes J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 1440 - 1446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Chung, D. Liou, S. Karlan, A. Waxman, K. Fujimoto, M. Hagiike, and E. H. Phillips Preoperative FDG-PET for Axillary Metastases in Patients With Breast Cancer Arch Surg, August 1, 2006; 141(8): 783 - 789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Juweid, G. A. Wiseman, J. M. Vose, J. M. Ritchie, Y. Menda, J. E. Wooldridge, F. M. Mottaghy, E. M. Rohren, N. M. Blumstein, A. Stolpen, et al. Response Assessment of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma by Integrated International Workshop Criteria and Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2005; 23(21): 4652 - 4661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Quon and S. S. Gambhir FDG-PET and Beyond: Molecular Breast Cancer Imaging J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2005; 23(8): 1664 - 1673. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-J. Kim, S.-k. Kim, E. S. Lee, J. Ro, and S. h. Kang Predictive value of [18F]FDG PET for pathological response of breast cancer to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy Ann. Onc., September 1, 2004; 15(9): 1352 - 1357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Boellaard, N. C. Krak, O. S. Hoekstra, and A. A. Lammertsma Effects of Noise, Image Resolution, and ROI Definition on the Accuracy of Standard Uptake Values: A Simulation Study J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1519 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Rohren, T. G. Turkington, and R. E. Coleman Clinical Applications of PET in Oncology Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 305 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J.M. van der Hoeven, N. C. Krak, O. S. Hoekstra, E. F.I. Comans, R. P.A. Boom, D. van Geldere, S. Meijer, E. van der Wall, J. Buter, H. M. Pinedo, et al. 18F-2-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography in Staging of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2004; 22(7): 1253 - 1259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Wahl, B. A. Siegel, R. E. Coleman, and C. G. Gatsonis Prospective Multicenter Study of Axillary Nodal Staging by Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer: A Report of the Staging Breast Cancer With PET Study Group J. Clin. Oncol., January 15, 2004; 22(2): 277 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Guller, E. Nitzsche, H. Moch, and M. Zuber Is Positron Emission Tomography an Accurate Non-invasive Alternative to Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients? J Natl Cancer Inst, July 16, 2003; 95(14): 1040 - 1043. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Kostakoglu, H. Agress Jr, and S. J. Goldsmith Clinical Role of FDG PET in Evaluation of Cancer Patients RadioGraphics, March 1, 2003; 23(2): 315 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Kostakoglu and S. J. Goldsmith 18F-FDG PET Evaluation of the Response to Therapy for Lymphoma and for Breast, Lung, and Colorectal Carcinoma J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2003; 44(2): 224 - 239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Bos, J. J.M. van der Hoeven, E. van der Wall, P. van der Groep, P. J. van Diest, E. F.I. Comans, U. Joshi, G. L. Semenza, O. S. Hoekstra, A. A. Lammertsma, et al. Biologic Correlates of 18Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in Human Breast Cancer Measured by Positron Emission Tomography J. Clin. Oncol., January 15, 2002; 20(2): 379 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Avril, M. Menzel, J. Dose, M. Schelling, W. Weber, F. Janicke, W. Nathrath, and M. Schwaiger Glucose Metabolism of Breast Cancer Assessed by 18F-FDG PET: Histologic and Immunohistochemical Tissue Analysis J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2001; 42(1): 9 - 16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]