Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, H.
Right arrow Articles by Newell, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, H.
Right arrow Articles by Newell, D. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 18, Issue 21 (November), 2000: 3614-3621
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Prospective Validation of Renal Function–Based Carboplatin Dosing in Children With Cancer: A United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group Trial

By Huw Thomas, Alan V. Boddy, Martin W. English, Rachel Hobson, John Imeson, Ian Lewis, Bruce Morland, Andrew D. J. Pearson, Ross Pinkerton, Lisa Price, Michael Stevens, David R. Newell

From the Departments of Oncology and Child Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle; Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey; Birmingham Hospital for Sick Children, Birmingham; St James’ Hospital, Leeds, Yorkshire; United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group, University of Leicester, Leicester; and on behalf of the New Agents Group of the United Kingdom, Children’s Cancer Study Group.

Address reprint requests to David R. Newell, PhD, Cancer Research Unit, Medical School, University of Newcastle, Framlington Place, Newcastle, NE2 4HH, England, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE: Carboplatin dosing in adults with cancer is based on renal function. The purpose of the current study was to validate a previously developed pediatric carboplatin-dosing formula.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight pediatric patients were randomized to receive a carboplatin dose calculated according to surface area or a renal function–based dosing formula. On the next course of therapy, the alternative dosing method was used for each patient. Carboplatin pharmacokinetics (based on free plasma platinum concentrations) were measured after both courses.

RESULTS: The mean observed areas under the carboplatin concentration–versus-time curve (AUCs) after renal function– and surface area–based dosing were 98% and 95% of the target AUCs, respectively. The variation in the observed AUC was significantly less after renal function–based dosing (F test, P = .02), such that 74% of courses had an observed AUC within ± 20% of the target value, versus 49% for courses after dosing according to surface area. Only one of 22 courses at the center with the most experience with renal function–based dosing was associated with an AUC outside ± 20% of the target value, versus nine of 22 courses after surface area–based dosing in the same center. There was a relationship (r2 = .71) between carboplatin AUC and thrombocytopenia in 10 neuroblastoma patients treated with a combination of carboplatin, vincristine, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide.

CONCLUSION: Renal function–based carboplatin dosing in children results in more consistent drug exposure than surface area–based drug administration.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Oncol Pharm PractHome page
S. Kaestner and G. Sewell
Dose-banding of carboplatin: rationale and proposed banding scheme
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, June 1, 2007; 13(2): 109 - 117.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
J. Goodisman and A.-K. Souid
Constancy in integrated Cisplatin plasma concentrations among pediatric patients.
J. Clin. Pharmacol., April 1, 2006; 46(4): 443 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. C. Etienne, F. Leger, X. Pivot, E. Chatelut, R. J. Bensadoun, E. Guardiola, N. Renee, N. Magne, P. Canal, and G. Milano
Pharmacokinetics of low-dose carboplatin and applicability of a method of calculation for estimating individual drug clearance
Ann. Onc., April 1, 2003; 14(4): 643 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
G. J. Veal, C. Dias, L. Price, A. Parry, J. Errington, J. Hale, A. D. J. Pearson, A. V. Boddy, D. R. Newell, and M. J. Tilby
Influence of Cellular Factors and Pharmacokinetics on the Formation of Platinum-DNA Adducts in Leukocytes of Children Receiving Cisplatin Therapy
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2001; 7(8): 2205 - 2212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online