Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hussain, M.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, E. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hussain, M.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, E. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 18, Issue 5 (March), 2000: 1043
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Androgen Deprivation and Four Courses of Fixed-Schedule Suramin Treatment in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Southwest Oncology Group Study

By Maha Hussain, Emily I. Fisher, Daniel P. Petrylak, John O’Connor, David P. Wood, Eric J. Small, Mario A. Eisenberger, E. David Crawford

From the Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute and Wayne State University, Detroit, MI; Southwest Oncology Group Statistical Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Medicine and Irving Center for Clinical Research, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY; University of Kentucky Medical Center-Urologic Cancer Outreach Program, Lexington, KY; Departments of Medicine and Urology, San Francisco Urologic Cancer Outreach Program, San Francisco, CA; Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD; and Departments of Radiation and Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO.

Address reprint requests to Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG-9343), Operations Office, 14980 Omicron Dr, San Antonio, TX 78245-3217.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of administering a combination of suramin and hydrocortisone in addition to androgen deprivation in a cooperative group setting; to assess the feasibility of treatment with multiple courses of suramin; and to assess progression-free and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer who underwent such treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer who had adequate hematologic, hepatic, renal, neurologic, and coagulation parameters were treated by combined androgen deprivation and suramin plus hydrocortisone. Suramin was administered on a 78-day fixed dosing schedule (one cycle), and suramin treatment cycles were repeated every 6 months for a total of four cycles. The statistical design was developed on the basis of the feasibility of administering suramin, as judged by the number of patients who developed neurotoxicity of grade 3 or higher or by treatment interruption of 4 weeks or longer due to any persistent suramin-related toxicity.

RESULTS: Of the 62 patients enrolled onto the study between August 1994 and January 1997, 59 were eligible and assessable for toxicity on the first cycle. Thirty-two (54%) of 59 patients received a second cycle, 13 (22%) of 59 patients received a third cycle, and only five patients (8%) received a fourth cycle. During the first cycle, 27 patients were removed from the study: 17 because of toxicity, five because of disease progression, two who had died, and three because of other reasons. There was one therapy-related death. Grade 4 toxicities were noted in 11 and three patients during first and second courses, respectively. Neurotoxicity of grade 3 or higher was observed in nine and seven patients during the first and second cycles, respectively. Fifteen patients had treatment interruptions of 4 weeks or longer. Overall, only 54% (95% confidence interval, 41% to 67%) of the patients demonstrated acceptable limits of toxicity.

CONCLUSION: Suramin plus hydrocortisone and androgen deprivation has limited applicability in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer.

Presented in part at the Thirty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Los Angeles, CA, May 16-19, 1998.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Song, B. Yu, Y. Wei, M. G. Wientjes, and J. L.-S. Au
Low-Dose Suramin Enhanced Paclitaxel Activity in Chemotherapy-Naive and Paclitaxel-Pretreated Human Breast Xenograft Tumors
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2004; 10(18): 6058 - 6065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. A. Grossman, S. Phuphanich, G. Lesser, J. Rozental, L. B. Grochow, J. Fisher, and S. Piantadosi
Toxicity, Efficacy, and Pharmacology of Suramin in Adults With Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2001; 19(13): 3260 - 3266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online