|
|||||
|
|
||||||
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Oncology Androgen Deprivation and Four Courses of Fixed-Schedule Suramin Treatment in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Southwest Oncology Group StudyFrom the Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute and Wayne State University, Detroit, MI; Southwest Oncology Group Statistical Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Medicine and Irving Center for Clinical Research, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY; University of Kentucky Medical Center-Urologic Cancer Outreach Program, Lexington, KY; Departments of Medicine and Urology, San Francisco Urologic Cancer Outreach Program, San Francisco, CA; Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD; and Departments of Radiation and Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO. Address reprint requests to Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG-9343), Operations Office, 14980 Omicron Dr, San Antonio, TX 78245-3217. PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of administering a combination of suramin and hydrocortisone in addition to androgen deprivation in a cooperative group setting; to assess the feasibility of treatment with multiple courses of suramin; and to assess progression-free and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer who underwent such treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer who had adequate hematologic, hepatic, renal, neurologic, and coagulation parameters were treated by combined androgen deprivation and suramin plus hydrocortisone. Suramin was administered on a 78-day fixed dosing schedule (one cycle), and suramin treatment cycles were repeated every 6 months for a total of four cycles. The statistical design was developed on the basis of the feasibility of administering suramin, as judged by the number of patients who developed neurotoxicity of grade 3 or higher or by treatment interruption of 4 weeks or longer due to any persistent suramin-related toxicity. RESULTS: Of the 62 patients enrolled onto the study between August 1994 and January 1997, 59 were eligible and assessable for toxicity on the first cycle. Thirty-two (54%) of 59 patients received a second cycle, 13 (22%) of 59 patients received a third cycle, and only five patients (8%) received a fourth cycle. During the first cycle, 27 patients were removed from the study: 17 because of toxicity, five because of disease progression, two who had died, and three because of other reasons. There was one therapy-related death. Grade 4 toxicities were noted in 11 and three patients during first and second courses, respectively. Neurotoxicity of grade 3 or higher was observed in nine and seven patients during the first and second cycles, respectively. Fifteen patients had treatment interruptions of 4 weeks or longer. Overall, only 54% (95% confidence interval, 41% to 67%) of the patients demonstrated acceptable limits of toxicity. CONCLUSION: Suramin plus hydrocortisone and androgen deprivation has limited applicability in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. Presented in part at the Thirty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Los Angeles, CA, May 16-19, 1998.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|