Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 18, Issue 5
(March), 2000: 1102
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Multi-Institutional Phase I/II Trial of Paclitaxel, Cisplatin, and Etoposide With Concurrent Radiation for Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma
By Nathan Levitan,
Afshin Dowlati,
Donald Shina,
Mark Craffey,
Wilma Mackay,
Russell DeVore,
James Jett,
Scot C. Remick,
Alex Chang,
David Johnson
From the Ireland Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH; The Vanderbilt Clinic, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and Interlakes Hematology and Oncology, Rochester, New York, NY.
Address reprint requests to Nathan Levitan, MD, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH 44106.
PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of adding paclitaxel to standard cisplatin/etoposide (EP) and thoracic radiotherapy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients were enrolled onto this study. During the phase I section of this study, the dose of paclitaxel was escalated in groups of three or more patients. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. For cycles 1 and 2, paclitaxel was administered according to the dose-escalation schema at doses of 100, 135, or 170 mg/m2 intravenously over 3 hours on day 1. Once the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel (for cycles 1 and 2, concurrent with radiation) was determined, that dose was used in all subsequent patients entered onto the phase II section of this study. For cycles 3 and 4, the paclitaxel dose was fixed at 170 mg/m2 in all patients. On day 2, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 was administered for all cycles. On days 1, 2, and 3, etoposide 60 mg/m2/d (cycles 1 and 2) or 80 mg/m2/d (cycles 3 and 4) was administered. Chest radiation was given at 9 Gy/wk in five fractions for 5 weeks beginning on day 1 of cycle 1. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors were used during cycles 3 and 4 only.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were assessable. The MTD of paclitaxel was 135 mg/m2, with the dose-limiting toxicity being grade 4 neutropenia. Cycles 1 and 2 were associated with grade 4 neutropenia in 32% of courses, with fever occurring in 7% of courses and grade 2/3 esophagitis in 13%. Cycles 3 and 4 were complicated by grade 4 neutropenia in 20% of courses, with fever occurring in 6% of courses and grade 2/3 esophagitis in 16%. The overall response rate was 96% (complete responses, 39%; partial responses, 57%). After a median follow-up period of 23 months (range, 9 to 40 months), the median survival time was 22.3 months (95% confidence interval, 15.1 to 34.3 months)
CONCLUSION: The MTD of paclitaxel with radiation and EP treatment is 135 mg/m2 given over 3 hours. In this schedule of administration, a high response rate and acceptable toxicity can be anticipated.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Socinski and J. A. Bogart
Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Current Status of Combined-Modality Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 10, 2007;
25(26):
4137 - 4145.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S. Ettinger, B. A. Berkey, R. A. Abrams, J. Fontanesi, M. Machtay, P. J. Duncan, W. J. Curran Jr, B. Movsas, and R. W. Byhardt
Study of Paclitaxel, Etoposide, and Cisplatin Chemotherapy Combined With Twice-Daily Thoracic Radiotherapy for Patients With Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9609 Phase II Study
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 2005;
23(22):
4991 - 4998.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Bremnes, S. Sundstrom, J. Vilsvik, and U. Aasebo
Multicenter Phase II Trial of Paclitaxel, Cisplatin, and Etoposide With Concurrent Radiation for Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 2001;
19(15):
3532 - 3538.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. H. Cohen
Thalidomide in the treatment of high-grade gliomas.
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 1, 2000;
18(19):
3453 - 3453.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|