Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 18, Issue 6
(March), 2000: 1346-1350
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Phase II Trial of Docetaxel and Vinorelbine in Patients With Advanced NonSmall-Cell Lung Cancer
By Vincent A. Miller,
Lee M. Krug,
Kenneth K. Ng,
Barbara Pizzo,
Wendy Perez,
Robert T. Heelan,
Mark G. Kris
From the Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, and Departments of Medicine and Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Cornell University Medical College, New York, NY.
Address reprint requests to Vincent A. Miller, MD, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021; email millerv{at}mskcc.org
PURPOSE: Docetaxel and vinorelbine are active agents in advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and demonstrate preclinical synergism perhaps, in part, through their inactivation of the proto-oncogene bcl-2. We show that docetaxel (60 mg/m2) and vinorelbine (45 mg/m2) can be safely combined when given on an every 2-week schedule with filgrastim, with encouraging antitumor activity observed.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five chemotherapy naïve patients with advanced NSCLC received vinorelbine as an intravenous push immediately followed by docetaxel as a 1-hour intravenous infusion once every 2 weeks. Prophylactic corticosteroids, ciprofloxacin, and filgrastim were used.
RESULTS: We delivered median doses of 450 mg/m2 of vinorelbine and 600 mg/m2 of docetaxel. The major objective response rate was 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34% to 68%). With a median follow-up of 14 months, the predicted median survival time was 14 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 60% (95% CI, 44% to 80%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in five patients and five (1.3%) of 384 treatments. No dose-limiting neurotoxicity occurred. Symptomatic onycholysis and excessive lacrimation were observed after several months or more of therapy.
CONCLUSION: Docetaxel 60 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 45 mg/m2, both given every 2 weeks, is a highly active combination for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Filgrastim largely obviates neutropenic fever and allows for the single-agent dose-intensity of both drugs to be delivered. The occurrence of certain late toxicities can limit use in some cases and suggests that the combination could also be beneficial in settings requiring briefer, fixed periods of treatment, such as in induction or postoperative therapy.
Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Atlanta, GA, May 15-18, 1999.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Limentani, A. M. Brufsky, J. K. Erban, M. Jahanzeb, and D. Lewis
Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Docetaxel, Vinorelbine, and Trastuzumab Followed by Surgery and Adjuvant Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide in Women With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Overexpressing Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 1, 2007;
25(10):
1232 - 1238.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Johansen, J. Kuttesch, W. A. Bleyer, M. Krailo, M. Ames, and T. Madden
Phase I Evaluation of Oral and Intravenous Vinorelbine in Pediatric Cancer Patients: A Report from the Children's Oncology Group
Clin. Cancer Res.,
January 15, 2006;
12(2):
516 - 522.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. P. Stathopoulos, M. Veslemes, N. Georgatou, D. Antoniou, P. Giamboudakis, K. Katis, D. Tsavdaridis, S. K. Rigatos, I. Dimitroulis, S. Bastani, et al.
Front-line paclitaxel-vinorelbine versus paclitaxel-carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase III trial
Ann. Onc.,
July 1, 2004;
15(7):
1048 - 1055.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. A. Miller, D. H. Johnson, L. M. Krug, B. Pizzo, L. Tyson, W. Perez, P. Krozely, A. Sandler, D. Carbone, R. T. Heelan, et al.
Pilot Trial of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Gefitinib Plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Patients With Stage IIIB or IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 1, 2003;
21(11):
2094 - 2100.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Danesi, F. De Braud, S. Fogli, T. M. De Pas, A. Di Paolo, G. Curigliano, and M. Del Tacca
Pharmacogenetics of Anticancer Drug Sensitivity in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Pharmacol. Rev.,
March 1, 2003;
55(1):
57 - 103.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. V. Mattson, R. P. Abratt, G. ten Velde, and K. Krofta
Docetaxel as neoadjuvant therapy for radically treatable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a multinational randomised phase III study
Ann. Onc.,
January 1, 2003;
14(1):
116 - 122.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Inoue and N. Saijo
Recent Advances in the Chemotherapy of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 1, 2001;
31(7):
299 - 304.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. R. Khuri, J. R. Rigas, R. A. Figlin, R. J. Gralla, D. M. Shin, R. Munden, N. Fox, M. R. Huyghe, Y. Kean, S. D. Reich, et al.
Multi-Institutional Phase I/II Trial of Oral Bexarotene in Combination With Cisplatin and Vinorelbine in Previously Untreated Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 15, 2001;
19(10):
2626 - 2637.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. V. Kornek, H. Ulrich-Pur, M. Penz, K. Haider;, W. Kwasny, D. Depisch, E. Kovats, F. Lang, B. Schneeweiss, and W. Scheithauer
Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer with Vinorelbine and Docetaxel With or Without Human Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 1, 2001;
19(3):
621 - 627.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|