Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eeles, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Powles, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eeles, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Powles, T. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 18, No 21S (November 1 Supplement) 2000: 93s-99s
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Oncology


STATE-OF-THE-ART: CLINICAL CANCER GENETICS IN THE NEW MELLENNIUM

Chemoprevention Options for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers

By Rosalind A. Eeles, Trevor J. Powles

From the Institute of Cancer Research, The Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom.

Address reprint requests to Rosalind A. Eeles, MA, FRCP, FRCR, PhD, Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Downs Rd, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom; email ros{at}icr.ac.uk

ABSTRACT

BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer predisposition gene mutation carriers are at markedly increased risk of breast and other cancers. The consideration of chemopreventative options will depend on the cancer site and age-specific penetrance curve. Most chemoprevention studies to date have investigated the role of endocrine intervention in women at increased risk of breast cancer, and study results are conflicting. At the present time, there is uncertainty regarding whether endocrine intervention, particularly with tamoxifen, is as effective in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers as in other women who are at increased risk of breast cancer because of hormonal factors or genes with moderately conferred cancer risks. Furthermore, if chemoprevention were needed for at least 10 years to produce an effect, new chemoprevention agents will need to be developed for women in their 30s, as the breast cancer risk curves are steepest between 40 and 50 years of age. Consideration is now being given to types of chemoprevention in this younger age group. There is also an increased risk of other cancers (in particular ovarian cancer and, in men, prostate cancer), and considerations regarding chemoprevention will have to encompass cancer at these sites.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Goldhirsch, J. H. Glick, R. D. Gelber, A. S. Coates, and H.-J. Senn
Meeting Highlights: International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., September 15, 2001; 19(18): 3817 - 3827.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online