Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 19, Issue 1
(January), 2001: 62-71
© 2001 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Flutamide Versus Prednisone in Patients With Prostate Cancer Symptomatically Progressing After Androgen-Ablative Therapy: A Phase III Study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Group
By S. D. Fosså,
P. H.Th. Slee,
M. Brausi,
S. Horenblas,
R. R. Hall,
J. W. Hetherington,
N. Aaronson,
L. de Prijck,
L. Collette
From the Department of Medical Oncology and Radiotherapy, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, and Netherlands Cancer Hospital, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, and Princess Royal Hospital, Hull, United Kingdom; and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Data Center, Brussels, Belgium.
Address reprint requests to Sophie D. Fosså, MD, Department of Oncology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Ullernchausseen 70, 0310 Olso, Norway; email s.d.fossa{at}klinmed.uio.no
PURPOSE: Time to progression (TTP), overall survival, and quality of life (QL) were compared in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC) treated with prednisone (5 mg orally, four times a day) or flutamide (250 mg orally, three times a day).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Symptomatic patients were randomized to receive either prednisone (101 patients) or flutamide (100 patients). Subjective response was assessed based on performance status, the use of analgesics, and the need to apply alternative palliative treatment. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)based biochemical response ( 50% reduction of baseline PSA) was recorded. At baseline and at 6-week intervals during follow-up, patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30.
RESULTS: There was no difference between the groups in median TTP (prednisone, 3.4 months; flutamide, 2.3 months) or overall survival (prednisone, 10.6 months; flutamide, 11.2 months). In the prednisone group, 56% of the patients experienced a subjective response, compared with 45% in the flutamide group (P = .18). The median response duration was 4.8 months for prednisone and 4.2 months for flutamide. A biochemical response was observed in 21% and 23% of the prednisone and flutamide groups, respectively. Gastrointestinal toxicity was the reason for trial discontinuation in seven patients receiving flutamide and two patients receiving prednisone. The QL assessment parameters favored the use of prednisone with statistically significant differences in pain, fatigue, role functioning, appetite loss, gastrointestinal distress, and overall QL.
CONCLUSION: In symptomatic HRPC, treatment with prednisone or flutamide leads to similar rates of TTP and overall survival and no difference in subjective or biochemical response. The QL results favor the use of low-cost prednisone in patients with HRPC.
The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. E. Haines and R. M. Stanley
Perspective on "Chemotherapy for Advanced Prostate Cancer: 25 Years Later": Is It a Mirage or an Oasis?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 20, 2008;
26(24):
4049 - 4050.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. R. Berthold, C. N. Sternberg, and I. F. Tannock
Management of Advanced Prostate Cancer After First-Line Chemotherapy
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 10, 2005;
23(32):
8247 - 8252.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Joly and I. F. Tannock
Chemotherapy for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer
Ann. Onc.,
November 1, 2004;
15(11):
1582 - 1584.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. F. Tannock, R. de Wit, W. R. Berry, J. Horti, A. Pluzanska, K. N. Chi, S. Oudard, C. Theodore, N. D. James, I. Turesson, et al.
Docetaxel plus Prednisone or Mitoxantrone plus Prednisone for Advanced Prostate Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med.,
October 7, 2004;
351(15):
1502 - 1512.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Collette, G. van Andel, A. Bottomley, G. O.N. Oosterhof, W. Albrecht, T. M. de Reijke, and S. D. Fossa
Is Baseline Quality of Life Useful for Predicting Survival With Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer? A Pooled Analysis of Three Studies of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Group
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 1, 2004;
22(19):
3877 - 3885.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S R J Bott, A J Birtle, C J Taylor, and R S Kirby
Prostate cancer management: (2) an update on locally advanced and metastatic disease
Postgrad. Med. J.,
November 1, 2003;
79(937):
643 - 645.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Efficace, A. Bottomley, D. Osoba, C. Gotay, H. Flechtner, S. D'haese, and A. Zurlo
Beyond the Development of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL) Measures: A Checklist for Evaluating HRQOL Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials--Does HRQOL Evaluation in Prostate Cancer Research Inform Clinical Decision Making?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 15, 2003;
21(18):
3502 - 3511.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. D. Fossa, R. de Wit, J. T. Roberts, P. M. Wilkinson, P. H.M. de Mulder, G. M. Mead, P. Cook, L. de Prijck, S. Stenning, N. K. Aaronson, et al.
Quality of Life in Good Prognosis Patients With Metastatic Germ Cell Cancer: A Prospective Study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Group/Medical Research Council Testicular Cancer Study Group (30941/TE20)
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 15, 2003;
21(6):
1107 - 1118.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|