Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 19, Issue 1
(January), 2001: 89-93
© 2001 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Transurethral Resection of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: 10-Year Outcome
By Harry W. Herr
From the Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Address reprint requests to Harry W. Herr, MD, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021; email herrh{at}mskcc.org
PURPOSE: To determine the 10-year outcome of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated by transurethral resection (TUR) alone.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 432 newly evaluated patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, 151 were treated by standard radical cystectomy or by definitive TUR, if restaging TUR of the primary tumor site showed no (T0) or only nonmuscle-invasive (T1) residual tumor. Patients were followed-up every 3 to 6 months thereafter for a minimum of 10 years and up to 20 years. Primary end points of the study were disease-specific survival, survival with a bladder, frequency of recurrent invasive tumors in the bladder, and survival after salvage cystectomy.
RESULTS: The 10-year disease-specific survival was 76% of 99 patients who received TUR as definitive therapy (57% with bladder preserved) compared with 71% of 52 patients who had immediate cystectomy (P = .3). Of the 99 patients treated with TUR, 82% of 73 who had T0 on restaging TUR survived versus 57% of the 26 patients who had residual T1 tumor on restaging TUR (P = .003). Thirty-four patients (34%) relapsed in the bladder with a new muscle-invasive tumor, 18 (53%) were successfully treated with salvage therapy via cystectomy, and 16 patients (16%) died of disease.
CONCLUSION: Radical TUR for muscle-invasive bladder cancer is a successful bladder-sparing therapeutic strategy in selected patients who have no residual tumor on a repeat vigorous resection of the primary tumor site.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Bellmunt, S. Albiol, V. Kataja, and On behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Group
Invasive bladder cancer: ESMO Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Ann. Onc.,
May 1, 2009;
20(suppl_4):
iv79 - iv80.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Tsukamoto, H. Kitamura, A. Takahashi, and N. Masumori
Treatment of Invasive Bladder Cancer: Lessons from the Past and Perspective for the Future
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 1, 2004;
34(6):
295 - 306.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Madersbacher, W. Hochreiter, F. Burkhard, G. N. Thalmann, H. Danuser, R. Markwalder, and U. E. Studer
Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer Today--A Homogeneous Series Without Neoadjuvant Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 15, 2003;
21(4):
690 - 696.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Rodel, G. G. Grabenbauer, R. Kuhn, T. Papadopoulos, J. Dunst, M. Meyer, K. M. Schrott, and R. Sauer
Combined-Modality Treatment and Selective Organ Preservation in Invasive Bladder Cancer: Long-Term Results
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 15, 2002;
20(14):
3061 - 3071.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|