Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 19, Issue 11
(June), 2001: 2851-2855
© 2001 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma: Controversy Despite Widespread Agreement
By Kelly M. McMasters,
Douglas S. Reintgen,
Merrick I. Ross,
Jeffrey E. Gershenwald,
Michael J. Edwards,
Arthur Sober,
Neil Fenske,
Frank Glass,
Charles M. Balch,
Daniel G. Coit
From the Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, James Graham Brown Cancer Center; Center for Advanced Surgical Technologies at Norton Healthcare; and the Alliant Community Trust Fund, Louisville, KY; University of South Florida, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; The American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Harvard University, Boston, MA; and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Center, New York, NY.
Address reprint requests to Kelly M. McMasters, MD, PhD, University of Louisville-James Graham Brown Cancer Center, 529 S Jackson St, Louisville, KY 40202; email: kelly.mcmasters@ nortonhealthcare.org.
ABSTRACT: Although sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for melanoma has been adopted throughout the United States and abroad as a standard method of determining the pathologic status of the regional lymph nodes, some controversy still exists regarding the validity and utility of this procedure. SLN biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure, performed on an outpatient basis at the time of wide local excision of the melanoma, with little morbidity. Numerous studies have documented the accuracy of this procedure for identifying nodal metastases. There are four major reasons to perform SLN biopsy. First, SLN biopsy improves the accuracy of staging and provides valuable prognostic information for patients and physicians to guide subsequent treatment decisions. Second, SLN biopsy facilitates early therapeutic lymph node dissection for those patients with nodal metastases. Third, SLN biopsy identifies patients who are candidates for adjuvant therapy with interferon alfa-2b. Fourth, SLN biopsy identifies homogeneous patient populations for entry onto clinical trials of novel adjuvant therapy agents. Overall, the benefit of accurate nodal staging obtained by SLN biopsy far outweighs the risks and has important implications for patient management.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Y. Bilimoria, C. M. Balch, J. D. Wayne, D. C. Chang, B. E. Palis, S. M. Dy, and J. R. Lange
Health Care System and Socioeconomic Factors Associated With Variance in Use of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma in the United States
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 10, 2009;
27(11):
1857 - 1863.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. I. Ross
Early-stage melanoma: staging criteria and prognostic modeling.
Clin. Cancer Res.,
April 1, 2006;
12(7):
2312s - 2319s.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Nathansohn, J. Schachter, and H. Gutman
Patterns of Recurrence in Patients With Melanoma After Radical Lymph Node Dissection
Arch Surg,
December 1, 2005;
140(12):
1172 - 1177.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. N. Cormier, Y. Xing, M. Ding, J. E. Lee, P. F. Mansfield, J. E. Gershenwald, M. I. Ross, and X. L. Du
Population-Based Assessment of Surgical Treatment Trends for Patients With Melanoma in the Era of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 1, 2005;
23(25):
6054 - 6062.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Kang, L. A. Wanek, R. Essner, M. B. Faries, L. J. Foshag, and D. L. Morton
Sentinel Lymphadenectomy Does Not Increase the Incidence of In-Transit Metastases in Primary Melanoma
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 20, 2005;
23(21):
4764 - 4770.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N Lamichhane, K W Shen, C L Li, Q X Han, Y J Zhang, Z M Shao, and Z Z Shen
Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients after overnight migration of radiolabelled sulphur colloid
Postgrad. Med. J.,
September 1, 2004;
80(947):
546 - 550.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
SESSION 4: THERAPY Cancer Therapy 2003: Current State of the Century: PAUL A. BUNN, JR., University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, Colorado 80262
Toxicol Pathol,
January 1, 2004;
32(1):
141 - 142.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C A Murray, W L Leong, D R McCready, and D M Ghazarian
Histopathological patterns of melanoma metastases in sentinel lymph nodes
J. Clin. Pathol.,
January 1, 2004;
57(1):
64 - 67.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Johnson, C. R. Bradford, S. B. Gruber, V. K. Sondak, and J. L. Schwartz
Staging Workup, Sentinel Node Biopsy, and Follow-up Tests for Melanoma: Update of Current Concepts
Arch Dermatol,
January 1, 2004;
140(1):
107 - 113.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Alonso, M. Martinez, L. Delgado, A. De Leon, D. De Boni, G. Lago, M. Garces, F. Fontes, J. Espasandin, and J. Priario
Staging of Regional Lymph Nodes in Melanoma Patients by Means of 99mTc-MIBI Scintigraphy
J. Nucl. Med.,
October 1, 2003;
44(10):
1561 - 1565.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. J. Busam
Advances in Molecular Staging of Melanoma Patients: Multimarker Analysis of Archival Lymph Node Tissue
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 1, 2003;
21(19):
3550 - 3551.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. L. Meyskens Jr.
Management of Human Melanoma: What Has the Last Decade Wrought?
Oncologist,
October 1, 2003;
8(5):
448 - 450.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Ready and M. A. Weinstock
Elective Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma Laid to Rest Yet Again
Arch Dermatol,
September 1, 2003;
139(9):
1203 - 1204.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R.J.C.L.M. Vuylsteke, P.A.M. van Leeuwen, M.G. S. Muller, H.A. Gietema, D.R. Kragt, and S. Meijer
Clinical Outcome of Stage I/II Melanoma Patients After Selective Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection: Long-Term Follow-Up Results
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 15, 2003;
21(6):
1057 - 1065.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V Davids, S H Kidson, and G S Hanekom
Accurate molecular detection of melanoma nodal metastases: an assessment of multimarker assay specificity, sensitivity, and detection rate
Mol. Pathol.,
February 1, 2003;
56(1):
43 - 51.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. McMasters, A. Sober, and J. M. Kirkwood
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Adjuvant Therapy for Melanoma: Evidence Revisited
Arch Dermatol,
January 1, 2003;
139(1):
99 - 99.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. E. Schmalbach, B. Nussenbaum, R. S. Rees, J. Schwartz, T. M. Johnson, and C. R. Bradford
Reliability of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping With Biopsy for Head and Neck Cutaneous Melanoma
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,
January 1, 2003;
129(1):
61 - 65.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Belhocine, G. Pierard, M. de Labrassinne, T. Lahaye, and P. Rigo
Staging of Regional Nodes in AJCC Stage I and II Melanoma: 18FDG PET Imaging versus Sentinel Node Detection
Oncologist,
August 1, 2002;
7(4):
271 - 278.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Mariani, M. Gipponi, L. Moresco, G. Villa, M. Bartolomei, G. Mazzarol, M. C. Bagnara, A. Romanini, F. Cafiero, G. Paganelli, et al.
Radioguided Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Malignant Cutaneous Melanoma*
J. Nucl. Med.,
June 1, 2002;
43(6):
811 - 827.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. McMasters, C. Chao, S. L. Wong, W. R. Wrightson, M. I. Ross, D. S. Reintgen, R. D. Noyes, P. B. Cerrito, M. J. Edwards, and for the Sunbelt Melanoma Trial Group
Interval Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Melanoma
Arch Surg,
May 1, 2002;
137(5):
543 - 549.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J Bold
Elective Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Melanoma--Invited Critique
Arch Surg,
April 1, 2002;
137(4):
461 - 461.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|