This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Eubank, W. B. Articles by Livingston, R. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Eubank, W. B. Articles by Livingston, R. B. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

¹⁸Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography to Detect Mediastinal or Internal Mammary Metastases in Breast Cancer

From the Departments of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, Oncology, and Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine; and Department of Radiology, Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; and Department of Mathematics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.

Address reprint requests to William B. Eubank, MD, Department of Radiology (114), Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108-1597; email: weubank{at}u.washington.edu

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of suspected disease in the mediastinum and internal mammary (IM) node chain by ¹⁸fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), compared with conventional staging by computed tomography (CT) in patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated intrathoracic lymph nodes using FDG PET and CT data in 73 consecutive patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer who had both CT and FDG PET within 30 days of each other. In reviews of CT scans, mediastinal nodes measuring 1 cm or greater in the short axis were considered positive. PET was considered positive when there were one or more mediastinal foci of FDG uptake greater than the mediastinal blood pool.

RESULTS: Overall, 40% of patients had abnormal mediastinal or IM FDG uptake consistent with metastases, compared with 23% of patients who had suspiciously enlarged mediastinal or IM nodes by CT. Both FDG PET and CT were positive in 22%. In the subset of 33 patients with assessable follow-up by CT or biopsy, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for nodal disease was 85% , 90%, and 88%, respectively, by FDG PET; 54% , 85%, and 73%, respectively, by prospective interpretation of CT; and 50%, 83%, and 70%, respectively, by blinded observer interpretation of CT. Among patients suspected of having only locoregional disease recurrence (n = 33), 10 had unsuspected mediastinal or IM disease by FDG PET.

CONCLUSION: FDG PET may uncover disease in these nodal regions not recognized by conventional staging methods. Future prospective studies using histopathology for confirmation are needed to validate the preliminary findings of this retrospective study.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. H. Lee, E. L. Rosen, and D. A. Mankoff The Role of Radiotracer Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Breast Cancer: Part 1--Overview, Detection, and Staging J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2009; 50(4): 569 - 581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C. Chen, N. U. Lin, M. Golshan, J. R. Harris, and J. R. Bellon Internal Mammary Nodes in Breast Cancer: Diagnosis and Implications for Patient Management--A Systematic Review J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2008; 26(30): 4981 - 4989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Mahner, S. Schirrmacher, W. Brenner, L. Jenicke, C. R. Habermann, N. Avril, and J. Dose-Schwarz Comparison between positron emission tomography using 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose, conventional imaging and computed tomography for staging of breast cancer Ann. Onc., July 1, 2008; 19(7): 1249 - 1254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. C. Hodgson and K. Y. Gulenchyn Is There a Role for Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer Staging? J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 712 - 720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B Klaeser, O Wiederkehr, D Koeberle, A Mueller, B Bubeck, and B Thuerlimann Therapeutic impact of 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the pre- and postoperative staging of patients with clinically intermediate or high-risk breast cancer Ann. Onc., August 1, 2007; 18(8): 1329 - 1334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P Veit-Haibach, G Antoch, T Beyer, H Stergar, R Schleucher, E A M Hauth, and A Bockisch FDG-PET/CT in restaging of patients with recurrent breast cancer: possible impact on staging and therapy Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2007; 80(955): 508 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N Aide, M Benayoun, K Kerrou, A Khalil, J Cadranel, and J N Talbot Impact of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]-FDG) imaging in sarcoidosis: unsuspected neurosarcoidosis discovered by [18F]-FDG PET and early metabolic response to corticosteroid therapy Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2007; 80(951): e67 - e71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Blodgett, C. C. Meltzer, and D. W. Townsend PET/CT: Form and Function Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 360 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Tran, B. S. Pio, B. Khatibi, J. Czernin, M. E. Phelps, and D. H.S. Silverman 18F-FDG PET for Staging Breast Cancer in Patients with Inner-Quadrant Versus Outer-Quadrant Tumors: Comparison with Long-Term Clinical Outcome J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2005; 46(9): 1455 - 1459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Quon and S. S. Gambhir FDG-PET and Beyond: Molecular Breast Cancer Imaging J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2005; 23(8): 1664 - 1673. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Colleoni, D. Zahrieh, R. D. Gelber, S. B. Holmberg, J. E. Mattsson, C.-M. Rudenstam, J. Lindtner, D. Erzen, R. Snyder, J. Collins, et al. Site of Primary Tumor Has a Prognostic Role in Operable Breast Cancer: The International Breast Cancer Study Group Experience J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2005; 23(7): 1390 - 1400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. B. Eubank, D. Mankoff, M. Bhattacharya, J. Gralow, H. Linden, G. Ellis, S. Lindsley, M. Austin-Seymour, and R. Livingston Impact of FDG PET on Defining the Extent of Disease and on the Treatment of Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2004; 183(2): 479 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Wahl, B. A. Siegel, R. E. Coleman, and C. G. Gatsonis Prospective Multicenter Study of Axillary Nodal Staging by Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer: A Report of the Staging Breast Cancer With PET Study Group J. Clin. Oncol., January 15, 2004; 22(2): 277 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Torizuka, T. Kanno, M. Futatsubashi, H. Okada, E. Yoshikawa, F. Nakamura, M. Takekuma, M. Maeda, and Y. Ouchi Imaging of Gynecologic Tumors: Comparison of 11C-Choline PET with 18F-FDG PET J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2003; 44(7): 1051 - 1056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Kostakoglu, H. Agress Jr, and S. J. Goldsmith Clinical Role of FDG PET in Evaluation of Cancer Patients RadioGraphics, March 1, 2003; 23(2): 315 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. B. Eubank, D. A. Mankoff, H. J. Vesselle, J. F. Eary, E. K. Schubert, L. K. Dunnwald, S. K. Lindsley, J. R. Gralow, M. M. Austin-Seymour, G. K. Ellis, et al. Detection of Locoregional and Distant Recurrences in Breast Cancer Patients by Using FDG PET RadioGraphics, January 1, 2002; 22(1): 5 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]