Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 19, Issue 15
(August), 2001: 3554-3561
© 2001 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Randomized Clinical Trials in Oncology: Understanding and Attitudes Predict Willingness to Participate
By Peter M. Ellis,
Phyllis N. Butow,
Martin H.N. Tattersall,
Stewart M. Dunn,
Nehmat Houssami
From the Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, and Medical Psychology Unit, University of Sydney, Departments of Cancer Medicine and Psychological Medicine, Sydney University, and Sydney Square Breast Clinic, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Address reprint requests to Peter M. Ellis, MBBS, PhD, Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre, 699 Concession St, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8V 5C2; email: peter.ellis{at}hrcc.on.ca
PURPOSE: To explore the association at different time points in the trajectory of breast cancer care, between anxiety, knowledge, and attitudes, on womens willingness to participate in randomized clinical trials.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was undertaken among women attending a breast clinic for screening mammography or diagnostic assessment plus women with newly diagnosed breast cancer to assess attitudes toward and willingness to participate in randomized clinical trials of breast cancer treatment.
RESULTS: Five hundred forty-five women completed questionnaires assessing knowledge of and attitudes toward randomized clinical trials. The mean age of respondents was 48.9 years (SD, 11.3 years). Thirty-three percent of women would consider participating in a clinical trial if they had breast cancer. Women with breast cancer (31%) were significantly more likely to decline to participate than women attending for screening mammography (15%) or diagnostic assessment (15%, P = .0002). Women who might consider participating in a randomized clinical trial were more knowledgeable about randomized trials (mean difference, 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2 to 1.2; P = .003). In a multivariate analysis, women who would consider participating in a randomized trial were younger (odds ratio [OR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93 to 0.99), more likely to want an active role in decision-making (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.3 to 7.6), and reported a greater impact from the positive aspects of clinical trials (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.8) and less impact from the negative aspects of clinical trials (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.2).
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that women who have a better understanding of issues about clinical trials have more favorable attitudes toward randomized trials and are more willing to consider participation in a clinical trial.
Women attending for breast screening or diagnostic assessment were recruited through the Medical Benefits Fund, Sydney Square Breast Clinic.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. W. Rasco, Y. Xie, J. Yan, J. R. Sayne, C. S. Skinner, J. E. Dowell, and D. E. Gerber
The Impact of Consenter Characteristics and Experience on Patient Interest in Clinical Research
Oncologist,
May 1, 2009;
14(5):
468 - 475.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. P. Williams, P. B. Mullan, and D. Todem
Moving from theory to practice: implementing the Kin KeeperSM Cancer Prevention Model
Health Educ. Res.,
April 1, 2009;
24(2):
343 - 356.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. R. Baquet, G. L. Ellison, and S. I. Mishra
Analysis of Maryland Cancer Patient Participation in National Cancer Institute-Supported Cancer Treatment Clinical Trials
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 10, 2008;
26(20):
3380 - 3386.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Chingono, T. Lane, A. Chitumba, M. Kulich, and S. Morin
Balancing science and community concerns in resource-limited settings: Project Accept in rural Zimbabwe
Clinical Trials,
June 1, 2008;
5(3):
273 - 276.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Wendler and T. Jenkins
Children's and Their Parents' Views on Facing Research Risks for the Benefit of Others
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med,
January 1, 2008;
162(1):
9 - 14.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. W. Gray, F. J. Hlubocky, M. J. Ratain, and C. K. Daugherty
Attitudes Toward Research Participation and Investigator Conflicts of Interest Among Advanced Cancer Patients Participating in Early Phase Clinical Trials
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 10, 2007;
25(23):
3488 - 3494.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. L. Ding, N. R. Powe, J. E. Manson, N. S. Sherber, and J. B. Braunstein
Sex Differences in Perceived Risks, Distrust, and Willingness to Participate in Clinical Trials: A Randomized Study of Cardiovascular Prevention Trials
Arch Intern Med,
May 14, 2007;
167(9):
905 - 912.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. M. Herman and L. K. Larkey
Effects of an Art-Based Curriculum on Clinical Trials Attitudes and Breast Cancer Prevention Knowledge
Health Educ Behav,
October 1, 2006;
33(5):
664 - 676.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Wallace, N. Fleshner, M. Jewett, J. Basiuk, and J. Crook
Impact of a Multi-Disciplinary Patient Education Session on Accrual to a Difficult Clinical Trial: The Toronto Experience With the Surgical Prostatectomy Versus Interstitial Radiation Intervention Trial
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 1, 2006;
24(25):
4158 - 4162.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. M. Ford, J. S. Evans, E. M. Stoffel, J. Balmana, M. M. Regan, and S. Syngal
Factors associated with enrollment in cancer genetics research.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
July 1, 2006;
15(7):
1355 - 1359.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. E. Avis, K. W. Smith, C. L. Link, G. N. Hortobagyi, and E. Rivera
Factors Associated With Participation in Breast Cancer Treatment Clinical Trials
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 20, 2006;
24(12):
1860 - 1867.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. T. Nguyen, C. P. Somkin, Y. Ma, L.-C. Fung, and T. Nguyen
Participation of Asian-American Women in Cancer Treatment Research: A Pilot Study
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs,
November 1, 2005;
2005(35):
102 - 105.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. P. Gross, N. Wong, J. A. Dubin, S. T. Mayne, and H. M. Krumholz
Enrollment of Older Persons in Cancer Trials After the Medicare Reimbursement Policy Change
Arch Intern Med,
July 11, 2005;
165(13):
1514 - 1520.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Townsley, R. Selby, and L. L. Siu
Systematic Review of Barriers to the Recruitment of Older Patients With Cancer Onto Clinical Trials
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 1, 2005;
23(13):
3112 - 3124.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Goldhirsch, W. C. Wood, R. D. Gelber, A. S. Coates, B. Thurlimann, and H.-J. Senn
Meeting Highlights: Updated International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 1, 2003;
21(17):
3357 - 3365.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. Kemeny, B. L. Peterson, A. B. Kornblith, H. B. Muss, J. Wheeler, E. Levine, N. Bartlett, G. Fleming, and H. J. Cohen
Barriers to Clinical Trial Participation by Older Women With Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 15, 2003;
21(12):
2268 - 2275.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E. Till, R. A. Phillips, and A. R. Jadad
Finding Canadian cancer clinical trials on the Internet: an exploratory evaluation of online resources
Can. Med. Assoc. J.,
April 29, 2003;
168(9):
1127 - 1129.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. L. Comis, J. D. Miller, C. R. Aldige, L. Krebs, and E. Stoval
Public Attitudes Toward Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 1, 2003;
21(5):
830 - 835.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. M. Ellis, P. N. Butow, and M. H. N. Tattersall
Informing breast cancer patients about clinical trials: a randomized clinical trial of an educational booklet
Ann. Onc.,
September 1, 2002;
13(9):
1414 - 1423.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|