Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 19, Issue 17
(September), 2001: 3758-3765
© 2001 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Using Plasma Transforming Growth Factor Beta-1 During Radiotherapy to Select Patients for Dose Escalation
By Mitchell S. Anscher,
Lawrence B. Marks,
Timothy D. Shafman,
Robert Clough,
Hong Huang,
Andrea Tisch,
Michael Munley,
James E. Herndon, II,
Jennifer Garst,
Jeffrey Crawford,
Randy L. Jirtle
From the Departments of Radiation Oncology, Medicine, and Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Address reprint requests to Mitchell S. Anscher, MD, Box 3085, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710; email: anscher{at}radonc.duke.edu
PURPOSE: The ability to prescribe treatment based on relative risks for normal tissue injury has important implications for oncologists. In nonsmall-cell lung cancer, increasing the dose of radiation may improve local control and survival. Changes in plasma transforming growth factor beta (TGFß) levels during radiotherapy (RT) may identify patients at low risk for complications in whom higher doses of radiation could be safely delivered.
PATIENT AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or medically inoperable nonsmall-cell lung cancer received three-dimensional conformal RT to the primary tumor and radiographically involved nodes to a dose of 73.6 Gy (1.6 Gy twice daily). If the plasma TGFß level was normal after 73.6 Gy, additional twice daily RT was delivered to successively higher total doses. The maximum-tolerated dose was defined as the highest radiation dose at which one grade 4 (life-threatening) late toxicity and two grade 3 to 4 (severe life-threatening) late toxicities occurred.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 16 months. Twenty-four patients were not eligible for radiation dose escalation beyond 73.6 Gy because of persistently abnormal TGFß levels. Fourteen patients whose TGFß levels were normal after 73.6 Gy were escalated to 80 Gy (n = 8) and 86.4 Gy (n = 6). In the 86.4-Gy group, dose-limiting toxicity was reached because there were two (33%) grade 3 late toxicities.
CONCLUSION: It is feasible to use plasma TGFß levels to select patients for RT dose escalation for nonsmall-cell lung cancer. The maximum-tolerated dose using this approach is 86.4 Gy.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Bentzen and A. Trotti
Evaluation of Early and Late Toxicities in Chemoradiation Trials
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 10, 2007;
25(26):
4096 - 4103.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Tabata, Y. Kadokawa, R. Tabata, M. Takahashi, K. Okoshi, Y. Sakai, M. Mishima, and H. Kubo
All-trans-Retinoic Acid Prevents Radiation- or Bleomycin-induced Pulmonary Fibrosis
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
December 15, 2006;
174(12):
1352 - 1360.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Tabata, H. Kubo, R. Tabata, M. Wada, K. Sakuma, M. Ichikawa, S. Fujita, T. Mio, and M. Mishima
All-trans retinoic acid modulates radiation-induced proliferation of lung fibroblasts via IL-6/IL-6R system
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
March 1, 2006;
290(3):
L597 - L606.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. L. Elliott and G. C. Blobe
Role of Transforming Growth Factor Beta in Human Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 20, 2005;
23(9):
2078 - 2093.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. B. Marks, J. Garst, M. A. Socinski, G. Sibley, A. W. Blackstock, J. E. H. S. Zhou, T. Shafman, A. Tisch, R. Clough, X. Yu, et al.
Carboplatin/Paclitaxel or Carboplatin/Vinorelbine Followed by Accelerated Hyperfractionated Conformal Radiation Therapy: Report of a Prospective Phase I Dose Escalation Trial From the Carolina Conformal Therapy Consortium
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 1, 2004;
22(21):
4329 - 4340.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. N. Coleman
Linking Radiation Oncology and Imaging through Molecular Biology (or Now That Therapy and Diagnosis Have Separated, It's Time to Get Together Again!)
Radiology,
July 1, 2003;
228(1):
29 - 35.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|