Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 19, Issue 18
(September), 2001: 3828-3835
© 2001 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Primary Chemotherapy for Operable Breast Cancer: Incidence and Prognostic Significance of Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery
By Roman Rouzier,
Jean-Marc Extra,
Mathieu Carton,
Marie-Christine Falcou,
Anne Vincent-Salomon,
Alain Fourquet,
Pierre Pouillart,
Edwige Bourstyn
From the Departments of Surgery, Biostatistics, Oncology, Radiotherapy, and Pathology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Address reprint requests to Edwige Bourstyn, MD, Department of Surgery, 26 rue dUlm, 75005 Paris, France; email: edwige.bourstyn{at}curie.net
PURPOSE: To determine the incidence and the prognostic value of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in patients treated with primary chemotherapy and breast-conserving surgery.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1985 and December 1994, 257 patients with invasive T1 to T3 breast carcinoma were treated with primary chemotherapy, lumpectomy, and radiation therapy. The median follow-up time was 93 months. To evaluate the role of IBTR in metastase-free survival, a Cox regression multivariate analysis was performed using IBTR as a time-dependent covariate.
RESULTS: The IBTR rates were 16% (± 2.4%) at 5 years and 21.5% (± 3.2%) at 10 years. Multivariate analysis showed that the probability of local control was decreased by the following independent factors: age 40 years, excision margin 2 mm, S-phase fraction more than 4%, and clinical tumor size more than 2 cm at the time of surgery. In patients with excision margins of more than 2 mm, the IBTR rates were 12.7% at 5 years and 17% at 10 years. Nodal status, age 40 years, and negative estrogen receptor status were predictors of distant disease in the Cox multivariate model with fixed covariates. The contribution of IBTR was highly significant (relative risk = 5.34) when added to the model, whereas age 40 years was no longer significant. After IBTR, 31.4% (± 7.0%) of patients developed metastases at 2 years and 59.7% (± 8.1%) at 5 years. Skin involvement, size at initial surgery, and estrogen receptor status were predictors of metastases after IBTR.
CONCLUSION: IBTR is a strong predictor for distant metastases. There are implications for conservative surgery after downstaging of the tumor and therapy at the time of IBTR.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Kiel
Changing Concepts in Radiation Therapy for Early Breast Cancer
ASCO Educational Book,
January 1, 2008;
2008(1):
49 - 53.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Thibault, C. Nos, M. Meunier, C. El Khoury, L. Ollivier, B. Sigal-Zafrani, and K. Clough
MRI for Surgical Planning in Patients with Breast Cancer Who Undergo Preoperative Chemotherapy
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
October 1, 2004;
183(4):
1159 - 1168.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. Mano and A. Awada
Primary chemotherapy for breast cancer: the evidence and the future
Ann. Onc.,
August 1, 2004;
15(8):
1161 - 1171.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Chen, F. Meric-Bernstam, K. K. Hunt, H. D. Thames, M. J. Oswald, E. D. Outlaw, E. A. Strom, M. D. McNeese, H. M. Kuerer, M. I. Ross, et al.
Breast Conservation After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: The M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 15, 2004;
22(12):
2303 - 2312.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. L. Rosen, K. L. Blackwell, J. A. Baker, M. S. Soo, R. C. Bentley, D. Yu, T. V. Samulski, and M. W. Dewhirst
Accuracy of MRI in the Detection of Residual Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
November 1, 2003;
181(5):
1275 - 1282.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Kaufmann, G. von Minckwitz, R. Smith, V. Valero, L. Gianni, W. Eiermann, A. Howell, S. D. Costa, P. Beuzeboc, M. Untch, et al.
International Expert Panel on the Use of Primary (Preoperative) Systemic Treatment of Operable Breast Cancer: Review and Recommendations
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 1, 2003;
21(13):
2600 - 2608.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. P. Mamounas
Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence After Lumpectomy: Is It Time to Take the Bull by the Horns?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 15, 2001;
19(18):
3798 - 3800.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|