Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 19, Issue 2
(January), 2001: 525-534
© 2001 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Prognostic Factors in Localized Primary Synovial Sarcoma: A Multicenter Study of 128 Adult Patients
By Martine Trassard,
Viviane Le Doussal,
Kamel Hacène,
Philippe Terrier,
Dominique Ranchère,
Louis Guillou,
Maryse Fiche,
Françoise Collin,
Marie-Odile Vilain,
Gérard Bertrand,
Jocelyne Jacquemier,
Xavier Sastre-Garau,
Nguyen Binh Bui,
Françoise Bonichon,
Jean-Michel Coindre
From the French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group, Paris, France.
Address reprint requests to Martine Trassard, Laboratoire dAnatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Centre René-Huguenin (Directeur: Pr J. Rouëssé), 35 rue Dailly, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France; email trassardmcrh{at}yahoo.com
PURPOSE: To identify most significant and therapeutically relevant prognostic factors in adults with localized primary synovial sarcomas (SS) and to confirm the usefulness of the French Federation of Cancer Centers (FNCLCC) grading system, the prognostic impact of which has been already proven in soft tissue sarcomas.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on 128 patients with nonmetastatic SS collected from a cooperative database by the FNCLCC Sarcoma Group between 1980 and 1994 were studied retrospectively. Immunohistochemistry was performed at diagnosis in 77 cases (61%). The tumors were classified as biphasic (n = 45), monophasic fibrous (n = 72), and poorly differentiated (n = 10) subtypes. Histologic grade was determined according to the FNCLCC method, and vascular invasion was assessed in every case.
RESULTS: The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate for this series of patients with localized SS was 62.9% (± 9.6% [SD]) with a median follow-up time of 37 months (range, 8 to 141 months). In multivariate analysis, the adverse risk factors associated with decreased DSS were International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III/IVA disease, male sex, and truncal tumor locations. For metastasis-free survival (MFS), disease stage III/IVA, tumor necrosis, and monophasic subtypes were the major factors associated with a less favorable prognosis. Separately, when not using disease stage, tumor necrosis, and mitotic activity, histologic grade became the most significant prognostic factor for both DSS and MFS. In addition, larger tumors and older patients become associated with a significantly worse prognosis. Independent adverse risk factors for local recurrencefree survival included histologic grade 3 and truncal tumor location.
CONCLUSION: These data confirm that not all SS present the same severe outcome. High-risk patients identified on the basis of these parameters may qualify for an aggressive treatment approach.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Italiano, N. Penel, Y.-M. Robin, B. Bui, A. Le Cesne, S. Piperno-Neumann, M. Tubiana-Hulin, E. Bompas, C. Chevreau, N. Isambert, et al.
Neo/adjuvant chemotherapy does not improve outcome in resected primary synovial sarcoma: a study of the French Sarcoma Group
Ann. Onc.,
March 1, 2009;
20(3):
425 - 430.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Canter, L.-X. Qin, R. G. Maki, M. F. Brennan, M. Ladanyi, and S. Singer
A Synovial Sarcoma-Specific Preoperative Nomogram Supports a Survival Benefit to Ifosfamide-Based Chemotherapy and Improves Risk Stratification for Patients
Clin. Cancer Res.,
December 15, 2008;
14(24):
8191 - 8197.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Ray-Coquard, A. Le Cesne, J. S. Whelan, P. Schoffski, B. N. Bui, J. Verweij, S. Marreaud, M. van Glabbeke, P. Hogendoorn, and J.-Y. Blay
A Phase II Study of Gefitinib for Patients with Advanced HER-1 Expressing Synovial Sarcoma Refractory to Doxorubicin-Containing Regimens
Oncologist,
April 1, 2008;
13(4):
467 - 473.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. D. Murphey, M. S. Gibson, B. T. Jennings, A. M. Crespo-Rodriguez, J. Fanburg-Smith, and D. A. Gajewski
From the Archives of the AFIP: Imaging of Synovial Sarcoma with Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics,
September 1, 2006;
26(5):
1543 - 1565.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. L. Spurrell, C. Fisher, J. M. Thomas, and I. R. Judson
Prognostic factors in advanced synovial sarcoma: an analysis of 104 patients treated at the Royal Marsden Hospital
Ann. Onc.,
March 1, 2005;
16(3):
437 - 444.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Guillou, J. Benhattar, F. Bonichon, G. Gallagher, P. Terrier, E. Stauffer, N. de Saint Aubain Somerhausen, J.-J. Michels, G. Jundt, D. R. Vince, et al.
Histologic Grade, But Not SYT-SSX Fusion Type, Is an Important Prognostic Factor in Patients With Synovial Sarcoma: A Multicenter, Retrospective Analysis
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 15, 2004;
22(20):
4040 - 4050.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Dennison, E. Weppler, and G. Giacoppe
Primary Pulmonary Synovial Sarcoma: A Case Report and Review of Current Diagnostic and Therapeutic Standards
Oncologist,
June 1, 2004;
9(3):
339 - 342.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. F. Okcu, M. Munsell, J. Treuner, A. Mattke, A. Pappo, A. Cain, A. Ferrari, M. Casanova, A. Ozkan, and B. Raney
Synovial Sarcoma of Childhood and Adolescence: A Multicenter, Multivariate Analysis of Outcome
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 15, 2003;
21(8):
1602 - 1611.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. V. Allander, P. B. Illei, Y. Chen, C. R. Antonescu, M. Bittner, M. Ladanyi, and P. S. Meltzer
Expression Profiling of Synovial Sarcoma by cDNA Microarrays : Association of ERBB2, IGFBP2, and ELF3 with Epithelial Differentiation
Am. J. Pathol.,
November 1, 2002;
161(5):
1587 - 1595.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Ladanyi, C. R. Antonescu, D. H. Leung, J. M. Woodruff, A. Kawai, J. H. Healey, M. F. Brennan, J. A. Bridge, J. R. Neff, F. G. Barr, et al.
Impact of SYT-SSX Fusion Type on the Clinical Behavior of Synovial Sarcoma: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study of 243 Patients
Cancer Res.,
January 1, 2002;
62(1):
135 - 140.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|