Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 19, Issue 4
(February), 2001: 1071-1077
© 2001 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Phase II Trial of Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic NonSmall-Cell Lung Cancer
By Dolores Isla,
Rafael Rosell,
José J. Sánchez,
Alfredo Carrato,
Enriqueta Felip,
Carlos Camps,
Angel Artal,
José Luis González-Larriba,
Pilar Azagra,
Vicente Alberola,
Cristina Martin,
Bartomeu Massutí,
for the Spanish Lung Cancer Group
From the Hospital Clínico Lozano Blesa and Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza; Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona; Free University of Madrid and Hospital Clínico, Madrid; Hospital General de Elche and Hospital General, Alicante; Hospital Vall dHebrón, Barcelona; and Hospital General, Hospital Clínico, and Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain.
Address reprint requests to Rafael Rosell, MD, Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Ctra Canyet s/n, 08916 Badalona, Barcelona, Spain; email: rrosell{at}ns.hugtip.scs.es
PURPOSE: Given the cisplatin-related myelotoxicity and nonhematologic toxicities, we were prompted to undertake a study of the noncisplatin combination of paclitaxel plus gemcitabine to evaluate the efficacy, tolerance, and survival of this combination in patients with locally advanced and metastatic nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received gemcitabine 2,000 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, for a maximum of eight cycles.
RESULTS: Between December 1997 and June 1998, 89 untreated NSCLC patients were enrolled; 30 (34%) had stage IIIB disease (23 with malignant pleural effusion and seven without), and 59 (66%) had stage IV disease. Eighty-six percent of patients had a performance status of 0 or 1. The median number of cycles administered was four (range, one to eight cycles). The mean dose-intensity for both paclitaxel and gemcitabine was nearly 100%. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were mild. Thirty-eight patients received second-line chemotherapy after completion of the study. The overall intent-to-treat response rate was 32.2%, with a higher response rate for stage IIIB patients (43.3%) than for stage IV patients (26.3%). Overall median survival was 9.9 months, and 1-year survival was 38.8% (14.2 months for stage IIIB and 7.7 months for stage IV; P = .007). Median survival was 10.2 months for patients with a performance status of 0 or 1 and 4.8 months for patients with a performance status of 2 (P = .007).
CONCLUSION: A biweekly paclitaxel/gemcitabine regimen was well tolerated, with an acceptable response rate and a reasonable median survival time, especially in patients with good performance status. It merits further exploration in future studies.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Takahashi, S. Higashi, H. Nishiyama, T. Segawa, E. Nakamura, H. Kinoshita, N. Itoh, S. Yamamoto, T. Kamoto, T. Habuchi, et al.
Biweekly Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine for Patients with Advanced Urothelial Cancer Ineligible for Cisplatin-Based Regimen
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 1, 2006;
36(2):
104 - 108.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. V. Scagliotti, C. Kortsik, G. G. Dark, A. Price, C. Manegold, R. Rosell, M. O'Brien, P. M. Peterson, D. Castellano, G. Selvaggi, et al.
Pemetrexed Combined with Oxaliplatin or Carboplatin as First-Line Treatment in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Phase II Trial
Clin. Cancer Res.,
January 15, 2005;
11(2):
690 - 696.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Colomer, A. Llombart-Cussac, A. Lluch, A. Barnadas, B. Ojeda, V. Caranana, Y. Fernandez, J. Garcia-Conde, S. Alonso, S. Montero, et al.
Biweekly paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in advanced breast cancer: phase II trial and predictive value of HER2 extracellular domain
Ann. Onc.,
February 1, 2004;
15(2):
201 - 206.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Alberola, C. Camps, M. Provencio, D. Isla, R. Rosell, C. Vadell, I. Bover, A. Ruiz-Casado, P. Azagra, U. Jimenez, et al.
Cisplatin Plus Gemcitabine Versus a Cisplatin-Based Triplet Versus Nonplatinum Sequential Doublets in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Spanish Lung Cancer Group Phase III Randomized Trial
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 1, 2003;
21(17):
3207 - 3213.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Castellano, R. Hitt, E. Ciruelos, H. Cortes-Funes, and R. Colomer
Biweekly vinorelbine and gemcitabine: a phase I dose-finding study in patients with advanced solid tumors
Ann. Onc.,
May 1, 2003;
14(5):
783 - 787.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Lorusso, E. Crucitta, N. Panza, N. Silvestris, M. Guida, F. Carpagnano, S. Mancarella, D. Sambiasi, and M. De Lena
Phase I/II study of paclitaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy of non-small-cell lung cancer
Ann. Onc.,
December 1, 2002;
13(12):
1862 - 1867.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|