Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 19, Issue 8
(April), 2001: 2247-2253
© 2001 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Germline Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Breast-Ovarian Families From a Breast Cancer Risk Evaluation Clinic
By A.-M. Martin,
M.A. Blackwood,
D. Antin-Ozerkis,
H.A. Shih,
K. Calzone,
T.A. Colligon,
S. Seal,
N. Collins,
M.R. Stratton,
B.L. Weber,
K.L. Nathanson
From the Divisions of Hematology and Oncology, Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, Cancer Center, and Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Address reprint requests to K.L. Nathanson, MD, Rm 513, BRBII/III, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 421 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104; email: knathans{at}mail.med.upenn.edu
PURPOSE: Data from the Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium suggest that the proportion of familial breast and ovarian cancers linked to BRCA1 or BRCA2 may be as high as 98% depending on the characteristics of the families, suggesting that mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 may entirely account for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. We sought to determine what proportion of families with both breast and ovarian cancers seen in a breast cancer risk evaluation clinic are accounted for by coding region germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 as compared to a linkage study group. We also evaluated what clinical parameters were predictive of mutation status.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Affected women from 100 families with at least one case of breast cancer and at least one case of ovarian cancer in the same lineage were screened for germline mutations in the entire coding regions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 by conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis, apolymerase chain reactionbased heteroduplex analysis, or direct sequencing.
RESULTS: Unequivocal deleterious mutations were found in 55% (55 of 100) of the families studied. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 accounted for 80% and 20% of the mutations overall, respectively. Using multivariate analysis, the strongest predictors of detecting a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 in this study group were the presence of a single family member with both breast and ovarian cancer (P < .0009; odds ratio [OR], 5.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.04 to 15.76) and a young average age at breast cancer diagnosis in the family (P < .0016; OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.38).
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that at least half of breast/ovarian families evaluated in a high-risk cancer evaluation clinic may have germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Whether the remaining families have mutations in noncoding regions in BRCA1, mutations in other, as-yet-unidentified, low-penetrance susceptibility genes, or represent chance clustering remains to be determined.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Plo, C. Laulier, L. Gauthier, F. Lebrun, F. Calvo, and B. S. Lopez
AKT1 Inhibits Homologous Recombination by Inducing Cytoplasmic Retention of BRCA1 and RAD51
Cancer Res.,
November 15, 2008;
68(22):
9404 - 9412.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Giannini, C. Capalbo, L. Ottini, A. Buffone, L. De Marchis, E. Margaria, D. Vitolo, E. Ricevuto, C. Rinaldi, M. Zani, et al.
Clinical Classification of BRCA1 DNA Missense Variants: H1686Q Is a Novel Pathogenic Mutation Occurring in the Ontogenetically Invariant THV Motif of the N-Terminal BRCT Domain
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 1, 2008;
26(25):
4212 - 4214.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Parmigiani, S. Chen, E. S. Iversen Jr, T. M. Friebel, D. M. Finkelstein, H. Anton-Culver, A. Ziogas, B. L. Weber, A. Eisen, K. E. Malone, et al.
Validity of Models for Predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations
Ann Intern Med,
October 2, 2007;
147(7):
441 - 450.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. E. Malone, J. R. Daling, D. R. Doody, L. Hsu, L. Bernstein, R. J. Coates, P. A. Marchbanks, M. S. Simon, J. A. McDonald, S. A. Norman, et al.
Prevalence and Predictors of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in a Population-Based Study of Breast Cancer in White and Black American Women Ages 35 to 64 Years
Cancer Res.,
August 15, 2006;
66(16):
8297 - 8308.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Chen, E. S. Iversen, T. Friebel, D. Finkelstein, B. L. Weber, A. Eisen, L. E. Peterson, J. M. Schildkraut, C. Isaacs, B. N. Peshkin, et al.
Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in a Large United States Sample
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 20, 2006;
24(6):
863 - 871.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Armstrong, B. Weber, P. A. Ubel, N. Peters, J. Holmes, and J. S. Schwartz
Individualized Survival Curves Improve Satisfaction With Cancer Risk Management Decisions in Women With BRCA1/2 Mutations
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 20, 2005;
23(36):
9319 - 9328.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K-M Rau, H-Y Kang, T-L Cha, S A Miller, and M-C Hung
The mechanisms and managements of hormone-therapy resistance in breast and prostate cancers
Endocr. Relat. Cancer,
September 1, 2005;
12(3):
511 - 532.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. B. Claus, S. Petruzella, E. Matloff, and D. Carter
Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in Women Diagnosed With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
JAMA,
February 23, 2005;
293(8):
964 - 969.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F Marroni, P Aretini, E D'Andrea, M A Caligo, L Cortesi, A Viel, E Ricevuto, M Montagna, G Cipollini, S Ferrari, et al.
Evaluation of widely used models for predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations
J. Med. Genet.,
April 1, 2004;
41(4):
278 - 285.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|