Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 19, No 18S (September 15 Supplement)
2001: 87s-92s
© 2001 American Society for Clinical Oncology
CATEGORICAL COURSE: CANCER PREVENTION |
Reducing the Risk of Breast Cancer With Tamoxifen in Women at Increased Risk
By Victor G. Vogel
From the Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute Breast Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Address reprint requests to Victor G. Vogel, MD, MHS, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute/Magee-Womens Hospital, 300 Halket St, Rm 3524, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; email: vvogel{at}mail.magee.edu
ABSTRACT: Validated quantitative models are available that permit the accurate estimation of a womans risk of developing invasive breast cancer during a specified period of time. Data from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Breast Cancer Prevention Trial indicate that tamoxifen can reduce the risk of developing breast cancer by at least 49% in women who are at increased risk. All premenopausal women whose 5-year risk of developing breast cancer is 1.67% or greater derive a net benefit from taking tamoxifen for risk reduction. Women who have either lobular carcinoma-in-situ or atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasia derive an even greater net benefit. Women who carry mutations in either the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene will also experience reduced incidence of breast cancer with tamoxifen. Although postmenopausal women derive a net benefit from tamoxifen through the reduction of both breast cancer and bone fracture event rates, the risks of both invasive endometrial cancer and thromboembolic events must be balanced in older women. Physicians should identify appropriate candidates with whom to discuss the possible benefits of tamoxifen for reducing the risk of breast cancer.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. G. Vogel and S. Lo
Preventing Hormone-Dependent Breast Cancer in High-Risk Women
J Natl Cancer Inst,
January 15, 2003;
95(2):
91 - 93.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|