This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bichakjian, C. K. Articles by Sybil Biermann, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bichakjian, C. K. Articles by Sybil Biermann, J. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Melanoma Information on the Internet: Often Incomplete—A Public Health Opportunity?

From the Departments of Dermatology, Orthopaedic Surgery, Otolaryngology, and Surgery (Division of Plastic Surgery), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.

Address reprint requests to J. Sybil Biermann, MD, 7304 Cancer Center, Box 0946, University of Michigan Hospital, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0946; email: biermann{at}umich.edu

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy and completeness of information regarding melanoma on the Internet, retrieved by use of search engines.

METHODS: The first 30 uniform/universal resource locators (URLs) from each of eight search engines using the search term "melanoma" were retrieved for evaluation of accuracy and completeness using a 35-point checklist rating system instrument. Four reviewers independently rated each of 35 sites, and one reviewer rated all 74 assessable sites. Kappa statistics were used to evaluate interrater variability.

RESULTS: A total of 74 assessable Web sites were evaluated. The remainder were inaccessible, link pages only, or duplicates. Thirty-five Web sites were each independently rated by four reviewers. The remaining 39 Web sites were each rated by one reviewer. The mean kappa statistic for all variables and all rater pairs for which a kappa could be calculated was 0.824, indicating excellent overall inter-rater reliability. The majority of Web sites failed to include complete information on general information, risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and prognosis. Ten Web sites (14%) contained a total of 13 inaccuracies, most relatively minor.

CONCLUSION: Medical information retrieved with the search term melanoma was likely to lack complete basic melanoma information and contained inaccuracies in 14% of sites. Health care providers can help patients by recommending comprehensive and accurate Web sites for patient review, by working to create accurate and thorough Web-based health information material, and by educating patients and the public about the variability in completeness and accuracy.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. S. Biermann, G. J. Golladay, J.F. M. Clough, S. R. Schelkun, and A. H. Alexander Orthopaedic Information: How to Find It Fast on the Internet J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2006; 88(5): 1134 - 1140. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. R. Hargrave, U. A. Hargrave, and E. Bouffet Quality of health information on the Internet in pediatric neuro-oncology Neuro-oncol, April 1, 2006; 8(2): 175 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. W. Trumbo Cancer Information on the World Wide Web: Gross Characteristics J Natl Cancer Inst, February 18, 2004; 96(4): 332 - 333. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C Tuffrey and F Finlay Use of the internet by parents of paediatric outpatients Arch. Dis. Child., December 1, 2002; 87(6): 534 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Meric, E. V Bernstam, N. Q Mirza, K. K Hunt, F. C Ames, M. I Ross, H. M Kuerer, R. E Pollock, M. A Musen, and S E. Singletary Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites BMJ, March 9, 2002; 324(7337): 577 - 581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]