Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 20, Issue 1
(January), 2002: 134-141
© 2002 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Melanoma Information on the Internet: Often IncompleteA Public Health Opportunity?
By Christopher K. Bichakjian,
Jennifer L. Schwartz,
Timothy S. Wang,
Janette M. Hall,
Timothy M. Johnson,
J. Sybil Biermann
From the Departments of Dermatology, Orthopaedic Surgery, Otolaryngology, and Surgery (Division of Plastic Surgery), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.
Address reprint requests to J. Sybil Biermann, MD, 7304 Cancer Center, Box 0946, University of Michigan Hospital, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0946; email: biermann{at}umich.edu
PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy and completeness of information regarding melanoma on the Internet, retrieved by use of search engines.
METHODS: The first 30 uniform/universal resource locators (URLs) from each of eight search engines using the search term "melanoma" were retrieved for evaluation of accuracy and completeness using a 35-point checklist rating system instrument. Four reviewers independently rated each of 35 sites, and one reviewer rated all 74 assessable sites. Kappa statistics were used to evaluate interrater variability.
RESULTS: A total of 74 assessable Web sites were evaluated. The remainder were inaccessible, link pages only, or duplicates. Thirty-five Web sites were each independently rated by four reviewers. The remaining 39 Web sites were each rated by one reviewer. The mean kappa statistic for all variables and all rater pairs for which a kappa could be calculated was 0.824, indicating excellent overall inter-rater reliability. The majority of Web sites failed to include complete information on general information, risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and prognosis. Ten Web sites (14%) contained a total of 13 inaccuracies, most relatively minor.
CONCLUSION: Medical information retrieved with the search term melanoma was likely to lack complete basic melanoma information and contained inaccuracies in 14% of sites. Health care providers can help patients by recommending comprehensive and accurate Web sites for patient review, by working to create accurate and thorough Web-based health information material, and by educating patients and the public about the variability in completeness and accuracy.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Biermann, G. J. Golladay, J.F. M. Clough, S. R. Schelkun, and A. H. Alexander
Orthopaedic Information: How to Find It Fast on the Internet
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
May 1, 2006;
88(5):
1134 - 1140.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. R. Hargrave, U. A. Hargrave, and E. Bouffet
Quality of health information on the Internet in pediatric neuro-oncology
Neuro-oncol,
April 1, 2006;
8(2):
175 - 182.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. W. Trumbo
Cancer Information on the World Wide Web: Gross Characteristics
J Natl Cancer Inst,
February 18, 2004;
96(4):
332 - 333.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C Tuffrey and F Finlay
Use of the internet by parents of paediatric outpatients
Arch. Dis. Child.,
December 1, 2002;
87(6):
534 - 536.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Meric, E. V Bernstam, N. Q Mirza, K. K Hunt, F. C Ames, M. I Ross, H. M Kuerer, R. E Pollock, M. A Musen, and S E. Singletary
Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites
BMJ,
March 9, 2002;
324(7337):
577 - 581.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|