Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 20, Issue 1
(January), 2002: 179-188
© 2002 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radical Surgery Versus Exclusive Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Cervical Cancer: Results From the Italian Multicenter Randomized Study
By Pierluigi Benedetti-Panici,
Stefano Greggi,
Alessandro Colombo,
Mariangela Amoroso,
Daniela Smaniotto,
Diana Giannarelli,
Gianni Amunni,
Francesco Raspagliesi,
Paolo Zola,
Costantino Mangioni,
Fabio Landoni
From the Campus Bio-Medico Free University, Catholic University, and Regina Elena Institute, Rome; San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milan, and National Cancer Institute, Milan; University of Florence, Florence; National Cancer Institute, Naples; and University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Address reprint requests to Pierluigi Benedetti-Panici, MD, University Campus Bio Medico, Via E Longoni, 8300155, Rome, Italy; email: p.panici{at}unicampus.it
PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and radical surgery (RS) have emerged as a possible alternative to conventional radiation therapy (RT) in locally advanced cervical carcinoma. In 1990, a phase III trial was undertaken to verify such a hypothesis in terms of survival and treatment-related morbidity.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with squamous cell, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB2 to III cervical cancer were eligible for the study. They received cisplatin-based NACT followed by RS (type III to V radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy) (arm A) or external-beam RT (45 to 50 Gy) followed by brachyradiotherapy (20 to 30 Gy) (arm B).
RESULTS: Of 441 patients randomly assigned to NACT+RS or RT, eligibility was confirmed in 210 and 199 patients, respectively. Treatment was administered according to protocol in 76% of arm A patients and 72% of arm B patients. Adjuvant treatment was delivered in 48 operated patients (29%). There was no evidence for any significant excess of severe morbidity in one of the two arms. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 58.9% and 55.4% for arm A and 44.5% and 41.3% for arm B (P = .007 and P = .02), respectively. Subgroup survival analysis shows OS and PFS rates of 64.7% and 59.7% (stage IB2-IIB, NACT+RS), 46.4% and 46.7% (stage IB2-IIB, RT) (P = .005 andP = .02), 41.6% and 41.9% (stage III, NCAT+RS), 36.7% and 36.4% (stage III, RT) (P = .36 and P = .29), respectively. Treatment had a significant impact on OS and PFS.
CONCLUSION: Although significant only for the stage IB2 to IIB group, a survival benefit seems to be associated with the NACT+RS compared with conventional RT.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. B. Panici, F. Bellati, N. Manci, M. Pernice, F. Plotti, V. Di Donato, M. Calcagno, M. A. Zullo, L. Muzii, and R. Angioli
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery in Patients Affected by FIGO Stage IVA Cervical Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol.,
September 1, 2007;
14(9):
2643 - 2648.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Duenas-Gonzalez, C. Lopez-Graniel, A. Gonzalez-Enciso, L. Cetina, L. Rivera, I. Mariscal, G. Montalvo, E. Gomez, J. de la Garza, G. Chanona, et al.
A phase II study of multimodality treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer: neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by radical hysterectomy and adjuvant cisplatin chemoradiation
Ann. Onc.,
August 1, 2003;
14(8):
1278 - 1284.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Duenas-Gonzalez, C. M. Lopez-Graniel, A. Mota, A. Mohar, P. Benedetti-Panici, and S. Greggi
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery in Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 15, 2002;
20(12):
2908 - 2910.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|