Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 20, Issue 11
(June), 2002: 2658-2663
© 2002 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Family History and Prostate Cancer Screening With Prostate-Specific Antigen
By Tuukka Mäkinen,
Teuvo L.J. Tammela,
Ulf-Håkan Stenman,
Liisa Määttänen,
Sakari Rannikko,
Jussi Aro,
Harri Juusela,
Matti Hakama,
Anssi Auvinen
From the Finnish Cancer Registry, and the Departments of Clinical Chemistry and Urology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki; Department of Surgery, Jorvi Hospital, Espoo; Department of Surgery, Seinäjoki Central Hospital, Seinäjoki; and Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, and Medical School and School of Public Health, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Address reprint requests to Tuukka Mäkinen, MD, Finnish Cancer Registry, Liisankatu 21B, FIN-00170 Helsinki, Finland; email: tuukka.makinen{at}cancer.fi
PURPOSE: Early detection of prostate cancer has been recommended for men with affected first-degree relatives despite the lack of evidence for mortality reduction. We therefore evaluated the impact of family history in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Approximately 80,000 men were identified from the population register for the first screening round. Of the 32,000 men randomized to the screening arm, 30,403 were eligible at the time of invitation. A blood sample was drawn from the participants (n = 20,716), and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was determined. Men with a PSA level 4.0 ng/mL were referred for prostate biopsy. Information on family history was obtained through a self-administered questionnaire at baseline.
RESULTS: A total of 964 (5%) of the 20,716 screening participants had a positive family history, and 105 (11%) were screening-positive. Twenty-nine tumors were diagnosed, corresponding to a detection rate of 3.0% (29 of 964) and a positive predictive value of 28% (29 of 105). Of the 19,347 men without a family history, 1,487 (8%) had a PSA level 4.0 ng/mL. The detection rate was 2.4% (462 of 19,347) and the positive predictive value was 31% (462 of 1,487). The risk associated with a positive family history was not substantially increased (rate ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.9 to 1.8). The results were not affected by the age of the screenee or age at diagnosis of the affected relative. The program sensitivity was 6% (29 of 491) (ie, selective screening policy would have missed 94% of cancers in the population). No differences were seen in the characteristics of screen-detected cancers by family history.
CONCLUSION: Our findings provide no support for selective screening among men with affected relatives.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. J. Murff, D. R. Spigel, and S. Syngal
Does This Patient Have a Family History of Cancer?: An Evidence-Based Analysis of the Accuracy of Family Cancer History
JAMA,
September 22, 2004;
292(12):
1480 - 1489.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Makinen, T. L. J. Tammela, U.-H. Stenman, L. Maattanen, J. Aro, H. Juusela, P. Martikainen, M. Hakama, and A. Auvinen
Second Round Results of the Finnish Population-Based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial
Clin. Cancer Res.,
April 1, 2004;
10(7):
2231 - 2236.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Schaid
The complex genetic epidemiology of prostate cancer
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
April 1, 2004;
13(90001):
R103 - 121.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Stattin, M. Hakama, G. L. Wright Jr., and P. F. Schellhammer
Correspondence re: B-L. Adam et al., Serum Protein Fingerprinting Coupled with a Pattern-matching Algorithm Distinguishes Prostate Cancer from Benign Prostate Hyperplasia and Healthy Men. Cancer Res., 62: 3609-3614, 2002
Cancer Res.,
May 15, 2003;
63(10):
2701 - 2702.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Is Family History Relevant in Prostate Cancer Screening?
Journal Watch (General),
June 28, 2002;
2002(628):
7 - 7.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|