Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 20, Issue 13
(July), 2002: 2988-2994
© 2002 American Society for Clinical Oncology
ChlVPP/EVA Hybrid Versus the Weekly VAPEC-B Regimen for Previously Untreated Hodgkins Disease
By J. A. Radford,
A. Z.S. Rohatiner,
W. D.J. Ryder,
D. P. Deakin,
T. Barbui,
N. P. Lucie,
A. Rossi,
D. J. Dunlop,
R. A. Cowan,
P. M. Wilkinson,
R. K. Gupta,
R. D. James,
J. Shamash,
J. Chang,
D. Crowther,
T. A. Lister
From Christie Hospital, Manchester; St Bartholomews Hospital, London; and West of Scotland Lymphoma Group, Glasgow, United Kingdom; and Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo, Italy.
Address reprint requests to J.A. Radford, MD, Cancer Research UK Department of Medical Oncology, Christie Hospital, 550 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom; email: john.radford{at}man.ac.uk
PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that a chemotherapy regimen of relatively low toxicity and 11 weeks duration (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, vincristine, bleomycin, and prednisolone [VAPEC-B]) is at least as effective in terms of disease control as 6 months treatment with chlorambucil, vinblastine, procarbazine, and prednisone/etoposide, vincristine, and doxorubicin (ChlVPP/EVA hybrid), which is associated with a high risk of permanent sterility.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred eighty-two patients with previously untreated Hodgkins disease, clinical stages I/II (plus mediastinal bulk and/or B symptoms) and clinical stages III/IV were randomized at three United Kingdom and one Italian center to receive either six monthly cycles of ChlVPP/EVA hybrid or 11 weekly cycles of VAPEC-B. After chemotherapy and a restaging evaluation, radiotherapy was administered to sites of previous bulk or residual radiographic abnormality before patients were observed off treatment.
RESULTS: Further accrual to the trial was halted at the planned third interim analysis in September 1996. After a median follow-up of 4.9 years, freedom from progression (FFP), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) are all significantly better in the population treated with ChlVPP/EVA than VAPEC-B, where the comparative 5-year results are 82% and 62% (FFP), 78% and 58% (EFS), and 89% and 79% (OS), respectively. The superiority of ChlVPP/EVA was seen in both low-risk and intermediate/high-risk patients, although subset analysis suggested that ChlVPP/EVA and VAPEC-B produce equivalent results in the best-prognosis patients (Hasenclever score 2, nonbulky disease).
CONCLUSION: Apart from possibly in the best-prognosis group, where results are equivalent, ChlVPP/EVA hybrid produces significantly better FFP, EFS, and OS than VAPEC-B in patients with previously untreated Hodgkins disease.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Trotta, G. Apolone, S. Garattini, and G. Tafuri
Stopping a trial early in oncology: for patients or for industry?
Ann. Onc.,
July 1, 2008;
19(7):
1347 - 1353.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. G. Gobbi, C. Broglia, A. Levis, A. La Sala, F. Valentino, T. Chisesi, S. Sacchi, F. Corbella, L. Cavanna, E. Iannitto, et al.
MOPPEBVCAD Chemotherapy with Limited and Conditioned Radiotherapy in Advanced Hodgkin's Lymphoma: 10-Year Results, Late Toxicity, and Second Tumors
Clin. Cancer Res.,
January 15, 2006;
12(2):
529 - 535.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. W.M. Johnson, J. A. Radford, M. H. Cullen, M. R. Sydes, J. Walewski, A. S. Jack, K. A. MacLennan, S. P. Stenning, S. Clawson, P. Smith, et al.
Comparison of ABVD and Alternating or Hybrid Multidrug Regimens for the Treatment of Advanced Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Results of the United Kingdom Lymphoma Group LY09 Trial (ISRCTN97144519)
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 20, 2005;
23(36):
9208 - 9218.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Engert, V. Ballova, H. Haverkamp, B. Pfistner, A. Josting, E. Duhmke, K. Muller-Hermelink, and V. Diehl
Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Elderly Patients: A Comprehensive Retrospective Analysis From the German Hodgkin's Study Group
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 2005;
23(22):
5052 - 5060.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Re, R. K. Thomas, K. Behringer, and V. Diehl
From Hodgkin disease to Hodgkin lymphoma: biologic insights and therapeutic potential
Blood,
June 15, 2005;
105(12):
4553 - 4560.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Ballova, J.-U. Ruffer, H. Haverkamp, B. Pfistner, H. K. Muller-Hermelink, E. Duhmke, P. Worst, M. Wilhelmy, R. Naumann, M. Hentrich, et al.
A prospectively randomized trial carried out by the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) for elderly patients with advanced Hodgkin's disease comparing BEACOPP baseline and COPP-ABVD (study HD9elderly)
Ann. Onc.,
January 1, 2005;
16(1):
124 - 131.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Bendandi, S. A. Pileri, and P. L. Zinzani
Challenging paradigms in lymphoma treatment
Ann. Onc.,
May 1, 2004;
15(5):
703 - 711.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Diehl, J. Franklin, M. Pfreundschuh, B. Lathan, U. Paulus, D. Hasenclever, H. Tesch, R. Herrmann, B. Dorken, H.-K. Muller-Hermelink, et al.
Standard and Increased-Dose BEACOPP Chemotherapy Compared with COPP-ABVD for Advanced Hodgkin's Disease
N. Engl. J. Med.,
June 12, 2003;
348(24):
2386 - 2395.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Sieber, H. Bredenfeld, A. Josting, T. Reineke, U. Rueffer, T. Koch, R. Naumann, F. Boissevain, P. Koch, P. Worst, et al.
14-Day Variant of the Bleomycin, Etoposide, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Procarbazine, and Prednisone Regimen in Advanced-Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Results of a Pilot Study of the German Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 1, 2003;
21(9):
1734 - 1739.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Diehl
Advanced Hodgkin's Disease: ABVD Is Better, Yet Is Not Good Enough!
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 15, 2003;
21(4):
583 - 585.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Diehl, H. Stein, M. Hummel, R. Zollinger, and J. M. Connors
Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Biology and Treatment Strategies for Primary, Refractory, and Relapsed Disease
Hematology,
January 1, 2003;
2003(1):
225 - 247.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|