Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2002.04.084 on July 1 2002

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pentz, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Abbruzzese, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pentz, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Abbruzzese, J. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 20, Issue 18 (September), 2002: 3785-3791
© 2002 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Study of the Media’s Potential Influence on Prospective Research Participants’ Understanding of and Motivations for Participation in a High-Profile Phase I Trial

By Rebecca D. Pentz, Anne L. Flamm, Jeremy Sugarman, Marlene Z. Cohen, G. Daniel Ayers, Roy S. Herbst, James L. Abbruzzese

From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; and Duke University, Durham, NC.

Address reprint requests to Rebecca D. Pentz, PhD, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, 1365 B Clifton Rd NE Suite 6200, Atlanta, GA 30322; email: rebecca_pentz{at}emoryhealthcare.org

PURPOSE: To describe prospective participants’ initial source of information about, understanding of, and motivation to participate in a phase I clinical trial of the antiangiogenesis agent human recombinant endostatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We surveyed 100 of 130 persons referred to the endostatin trial between October 1999 and November 2000 and analyzed media coverage of the agent from 1997 to 2000.

RESULTS: Forty-seven percent of survey respondents first heard about the trial from media reports. Fifty-one percent of these subsequently contacted their physicians. Thirty-three percent of respondents correctly understood the purpose of the trial. Seventy-nine respondents were interviewed before they met trial investigators to discuss the trial. Of these, those who first heard about endostatin from the media were five times more likely to understand correctly the trial’s purpose than those who first heard from other sources. Seventy-four percent (70 of 95) of respondents cited hope for personal benefit as the main reason for their willingness to enroll. Those who first heard about endostatin from the media were no more motivated by hope of personal benefit (77%) than those who first heard from other sources (71%) (P = .46). Ninety-nine percent of all respondents cited "joining the study gives me hope" as a contributing factor in their decision making about the trial.

CONCLUSION: Media coverage prompted prospective participants to contact their physicians but did not seem to hinder understanding nor could it be shown to heighten their hope for personal benefit.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. Seidenfeld, E. Horstmann, E. J. Emanuel, and C. Grady
Participants in Phase 1 Oncology Research Trials: Are They Vulnerable?
Arch Intern Med, January 14, 2008; 168(1): 16 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
S. L. Berg
Ethical Challenges in Cancer Research in Children
Oncologist, November 1, 2007; 12(11): 1336 - 1343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
W Glannon
Phase I oncology trials: why the therapeutic misconception will not go away
J. Med. Ethics, May 1, 2006; 32(5): 252 - 255.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. H. M. Schellens and M. J. Ratain
Endostatin: Are the 2 Years Up Yet?
J. Clin. Oncol., September 15, 2002; 20(18): 3758 - 3760.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. K. Daugherty
The "Cure" for Cancer: Can the Media Report the Hope Without the Hype?
J. Clin. Oncol., September 15, 2002; 20(18): 3761 - 3764.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. S. Herbst, K. R. Hess, H. T. Tran, J. E. Tseng, N. A. Mullani, C. Charnsangavej, T. Madden, D. W. Davis, D. J. McConkey, M. S. O'Reilly, et al.
Phase I Study of Recombinant Human Endostatin in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
J. Clin. Oncol., September 15, 2002; 20(18): 3792 - 3803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online