Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 20, Issue 2
(January), 2002: 514-520
© 2002 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Testing on Psychologic Distress in a Clinic-Based Sample
By Marc D. Schwartz,
Beth N. Peshkin,
Chanita Hughes,
David Main,
Claudine Isaacs,
Caryn Lerman
From the Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, and Lombardi Cancer Center, Washington, DC; and Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Address reprint requests to Marc D. Schwartz, PhD, Lombardi Cancer Center, Cancer Control, 2233 Wisconsin Ave, Ste 317, Washington, DC 20007; email: schwartm{at}georgetown.edu
PURPOSE: Despite the increasingly widespread availability of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing, little is known about the psychologic impact of such testing in the clinical setting. The objective of this study was to examine the long-term psychologic impact of receiving BRCA1/2 test results within a clinic-based testing program.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The participants were 279 high-risk women who underwent genetic counseling and testing for alterations in the BRCA1/2 genes. At baseline (before genetic testing) and at 6 months after the disclosure of mutation status, we measured perceived risk for breast and ovarian cancer, cancer-specific distress, and general distress. We examined the impact of the test result on each of these outcomes at the 6-month follow-up. Analyses were conducted separately for probands and their relatives who were unaffected with cancer.
RESULTS: We found no effect of test result among affected probands. Among unaffected relatives, we found that participants who received definitive negative test results exhibited significant reductions in perceived risk and distress compared with participants who received positive test results. Importantly, relatives who received positive test results did not exhibit increased distress or perceived risk.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that clinic-based BRCA1/2 testing can lead to psychologic benefits for individuals who receive negative test results. At 6 months after disclosure, those who receive positive or uninformative test results do not exhibit increased psychologic distress or perceived risk.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. C. Green, J. S. Roberts, L. A. Cupples, N. R. Relkin, P. J. Whitehouse, T. Brown, S. L. Eckert, M. Butson, A. D. Sadovnick, K. A. Quaid, et al.
Disclosure of APOE Genotype for Risk of Alzheimer's Disease
N. Engl. J. Med.,
July 16, 2009;
361(3):
245 - 254.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. C. Allain
Genetic Counseling and Testing for Common Hereditary Breast Cancer Syndromes: A Paper from the 2007 William Beaumont Hospital Symposium on Molecular Pathology
J. Mol. Diagn.,
September 1, 2008;
10(5):
383 - 395.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Parmigiani, S. Chen, E. S. Iversen Jr, T. M. Friebel, D. M. Finkelstein, H. Anton-Culver, A. Ziogas, B. L. Weber, A. Eisen, K. E. Malone, et al.
Validity of Models for Predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations
Ann Intern Med,
October 2, 2007;
147(7):
441 - 450.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. P. Tercyak, B. N. Peshkin, B. M. Brogan, T. DeMarco, M. F. Pennanen, S. C. Willey, C. M. Magnant, S. Rogers, C. Isaacs, and M. D. Schwartz
Quality of Life After Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Newly Diagnosed High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients Who Underwent BRCA1/2 Gene Testing
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 20, 2007;
25(3):
285 - 291.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. van Dijk, D. R.M. Timmermans, H. Meijers-Heijboer, A. Tibben, C. J. van Asperen, and W. Otten
Clinical Characteristics Affect the Impact of an Uninformative DNA Test Result: The Course of Worry and Distress Experienced by Women Who Apply for Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 2006;
24(22):
3672 - 3677.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. DiGianni, M. Rue, K. Emmons, and J. E. Garber
Complementary Medicine Use before and 1 Year Following Genetic Testing for BRCA1/2 Mutations
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
January 1, 2006;
15(1):
70 - 75.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Dorval, G. Gauthier, E. Maunsell, M. J. Dugas, I. Rouleau, J. Chiquette, M. Plante, R. Laframboise, M. Gaudet, P. J. Bridge, et al.
No Evidence of False Reassurance among Women with an Inconclusive BRCA1/2 Genetic Test Result
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
December 1, 2005;
14(12):
2862 - 2867.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Wang, D. J. Bowen, and S. L. R. Kardia
Research and Practice Opportunities at the Intersection of Health Education, Health Behavior, and Genomics
Health Educ Behav,
October 1, 2005;
32(5):
686 - 701.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. D. Schwartz, C. Lerman, B. Brogan, B. N. Peshkin, C. Isaacs, T. DeMarco, C. Hughes Halbert, M. Pennanen, and C. Finch
Utilization of BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Testing in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
April 1, 2005;
14(4):
1003 - 1007.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. R. Gritz, S. K. Peterson, S. W. Vernon, S. K. Marani, W. F. Baile, B. G. Watts, C. I. Amos, M. L. Frazier, and P. M. Lynch
Psychological Impact of Genetic Testing for Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 20, 2005;
23(9):
1902 - 1910.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Green, S. K. Peterson, M. W. Baker, G. R. Harper, L. C. Friedman, W. S. Rubinstein, and D. T. Mauger
Effect of a Computer-Based Decision Aid on Knowledge, Perceptions, and Intentions About Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer Susceptibility: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA,
July 28, 2004;
292(4):
442 - 452.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Hughes, S. K. Peterson, A. Ramirez, K. J. Gallion, P. G. McDonald, C. S. Skinner, and D. Bowen
Minority Recruitment in Hereditary Breast Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
July 1, 2004;
13(7):
1146 - 1155.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R Timman, T Stijnen, and A Tibben
Methodology in longitudinal studies on psychological effects of predictive DNA testing: a review
J. Med. Genet.,
July 1, 2004;
41(7):
e100 - e100.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. B. Daly
Tailoring Breast Cancer Treatment to Genetic Status: The Challenges Ahead
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 15, 2004;
22(10):
1776 - 1777.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. D. Schwartz, C. Lerman, B. Brogan, B. N. Peshkin, C. Hughes Halbert, T. DeMarco, W. Lawrence, D. Main, C. Finch, C. Magnant, et al.
Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 Counseling and Testing on Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 15, 2004;
22(10):
1823 - 1829.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Cullen, M. D. Schwartz, W. F. Lawrence, J. V. Selby, and J. S. Mandelblatt
Short-Term Impact of Cancer Prevention and Screening Activities on Quality of Life
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 1, 2004;
22(5):
943 - 952.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. D. Schwartz, E. Kaufman, B. N. Peshkin, C. Isaacs, C. Hughes, T. DeMarco, C. Finch, and C. Lerman
Bilateral Prophylactic Oophorectomy and Ovarian Cancer Screening Following BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Testing
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 1, 2003;
21(21):
4034 - 4041.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. van Oostrom, H. Meijers-Heijboer, L. N. Lodder, H. J. Duivenvoorden, A. R. van Gool, C. Seynaeve, C. A. van der Meer, J. G.M. Klijn, B. N. van Geel, C. W. Burger, et al.
Long-Term Psychological Impact of Carrying a BRCA1/2 Mutation and Prophylactic Surgery: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 15, 2003;
21(20):
3867 - 3874.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. L. Sabichi, M.-F. Demierre, E. T. Hawk, C. E. Lerman, and S. M. Lippman
Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Res.,
September 15, 2003;
63(18):
5649 - 5655.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. N. Peshkin, M. D. Schwartz, C. Isaacs, C. Hughes, D. Main, and C. Lerman
Utilization of Breast Cancer Screening in a Clinically Based Sample of Women after BRCA1/2 Testing
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
October 1, 2002;
11(10):
1115 - 1118.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|