This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sweet, K. M. Articles by Westman, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sweet, K. M. Articles by Westman, J. A.

Identification and Referral of Families at High Risk for Cancer Susceptibility

From the Clinical Cancer Genetics and Human Cancer Genetics Programs, Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Address reprint requests to Kevin Sweet, MS, James Cancer Hospital, 410 West 10th Ave, 303 East Doan, Columbus, OH 43210-1228; email: sweet-3{at}medctr.osu.edu

PURPOSE: Obtainment of family history and accurate assessment is essential for the identification of families at risk for hereditary cancer. Our study compared the extent to which the family cancer history in the physician medical record reflected that entered by patients directly into a touch-screen family history computer program.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 362 patients seen at a comprehensive cancer center ambulatory clinic over a 1-year period who voluntarily used the computer program and were a mixture of new and return patients. The computer entry was assessed by genetics staff and then compared with the medical record for corroboration of family history information and appropriate physician risk assessment.

RESULTS: Family history information from the medical record was available for comparison to the computer entry in 69%. It was most often completed on new patients only and not routinely updated. Of the 362 computer entries, 101 were assigned to a high-risk category. Evidence in the records confirmed 69 high-risk individuals. Documentation of physician risk assessment (ie, notation of significant family cancer history or hereditary risk) was found in only 14 of the high-risk charts. Only seven high-risk individuals (6.9%) had evidence of referral for genetic consultation.

CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the need to collect family history information on all new and established patients in order to perform adequate cancer risk assessment. The lack of identification of patients at highest risk seems to be directly correlated with insufficient data collection, risk assessment, and documentation by medical staff.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. E Wood, A. Stockdale, and B. S Flynn Interviews with primary care physicians regarding taking and interpreting the cancer family history Fam. Pract., September 1, 2008; (2008) cmn053v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. T. Scheuner, P. Sieverding, and P. G. Shekelle Delivery of Genomic Medicine for Common Chronic Adult Diseases: A Systematic Review JAMA, March 19, 2008; 299(11): 1320 - 1334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. S. Acheson, S. J. Zyzanski, K. C. Stange, A. Deptowicz, and G. L. Wiesner Validation of a Self-Administered, Computerized Tool for Collecting and Displaying the Family History of Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2006; 24(34): 5395 - 5402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. D. Ramsey, H. Hampel, A. de la Chapelle, and W.C. Benton Screening for the Lynch Syndrome N. Engl. J. Med., August 4, 2005; 353(5): 524 - 525. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Sifri, S. Gangadharappa, and L. S. Acheson Identifying and Testing for Hereditary Susceptibility to Common Cancers CA Cancer J Clin, November 1, 2004; 54(6): 309 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K Hemminki and C Eng Clinical genetic counselling for familial cancers requires reliable data on familial cancer risks and general action plans J. Med. Genet., November 1, 2004; 41(11): 801 - 807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. J. Murff, D. R. Spigel, and S. Syngal Does This Patient Have a Family History of Cancer?: An Evidence-Based Analysis of the Accuracy of Family Cancer History JAMA, September 22, 2004; 292(12): 1480 - 1489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Eng and D. Iglehart Decision Aids From Genetics to Treatment of Breast Cancer: Long-term Clinical Utility or Temporary Solution? JAMA, July 28, 2004; 292(4): 496 - 498. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K R Blazer, M Grant, S R Sand, D J MacDonald, G C Uman, and J N Weitzel Effects of a cancer genetics education programme on clinician knowledge and practice J. Med. Genet., July 1, 2004; 41(7): 518 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H Hampel, K Sweet, J A Westman, K Offit, and C Eng Referral for cancer genetics consultation: a review and compilation of risk assessment criteria J. Med. Genet., February 1, 2004; 41(2): 81 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D. McKelvey Jr. and J. P. Evans Cancer Genetics in Primary Care J. Nutr., November 1, 2003; 133(11): 3767S - 3772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Sweet, S. K. Willis, S. Ashida, and J. A. Westman Use of Fear-Appeal Techniques in the Design of Tailored Cancer Risk Communication Messages: Implications for Healthcare Providers J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2003; 21(17): 3375 - 3376. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. T. Lynch, C. L. Snyder, J. F. Lynch, B. D. Riley, and W. S. Rubinstein Hereditary Breast-Ovarian Cancer at the Bedside: Role of the Medical Oncologist J. Clin. Oncol., February 15, 2003; 21(4): 740 - 753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]