This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Malin, J. L. Articles by Brook, R. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Malin, J. L. Articles by Brook, R. H. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Quality of Breast Cancer Care: What Do We Know?

From the Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, and RAND, Santa Monica, CA.

Address reprint requests to Jennifer L. Malin, MD, University of California Los Angeles Division of GIM-HSR, 911 Broxton Ave, 1st Floor, Box 951736, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1736; email: jmalin{at}mednet.ucla.edu

PURPOSE: To critically review studies that describe patterns of care for breast cancer patients and to examine the data sources used for case identification and determining patterns of care.

METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE database (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD) in August 2001 for studies of breast cancer care published from January 1985 to June 2001. Thirty-eight articles, describing 32 studies, met the inclusion criteria for this review.

RESULTS: According to the patterns of care literature, approximately 10% of women do not have an axillary lymph node dissection, 11% to 26% do not have their hormone receptor status reported, 20% do not receive radiation after breast-conserving surgery, and 30% to 70% of women with lymph node–positive breast cancer are not prescribed tamoxifen. Twenty-five (78%) of the studies relied on cancer registries for case identification. Cancer registries (47%) and the medical record (38%) were the most frequent sources of data on process of care. Twenty percent of the articles reported using more than one data source to determine patterns of care.

CONCLUSION: Although more patterns of care research has taken place in breast cancer than in any other oncologic condition, we found the available data had many limitations. These limitations highlight the challenges of quality-of-care research. To track changes in the quality of cancer care that may result from our rapidly transforming health care system, we need reliable data on the quality of current practice.

This work does not necessarily represent the opinions of the funding organizations or of the institutions with which the authors are affiliated.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. Hassett, M. E. Hughes, J. C. Niland, S. B. Edge, R. L. Theriault, Y.-N. Wong, J. Wilson, W. B. Carter, D. W. Blayney, and J. C. Weeks Chemotherapy Use for Hormone Receptor-Positive, Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2008; 26(34): 5553 - 5560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Grunfeld, L. Lethbridge, R. Dewar, B. Lawson, L. F Paszat, G. Johnston, F. Burge, P. McIntyre, and C. C Earle Towards using administrative databases to measure population-based indicators of quality of end-of-life care: testing the methodology Palliative Medicine, December 1, 2006; 20(8): 769 - 777. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. A. Bickell, J. J. Wang, S. Oluwole, D. Schrag, H. Godfrey, K. Hiotis, J. Mendez, and A. A. Guth Missed Opportunities: Racial Disparities in Adjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2006; 24(9): 1357 - 1362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Malin, E. C. Schneider, A. M. Epstein, J. Adams, E. J. Emanuel, and K. L. Kahn Results of the National Initiative for Cancer Care Quality: How Can We Improve the Quality of Cancer Care in the United States? J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2006; 24(4): 626 - 634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. C. Richardson, L. Tian, L. Voti, A. G. Hartzema, I. Reis, L. E. Fleming, and J. MacKinnon The Roles of Teaching Hospitals, Insurance Status, and Race/Ethnicity in Receipt of Adjuvant Therapy for Regional-Stage Breast Cancer in Florida Am J Public Health, January 1, 2006; 96(1): 160 - 166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. C. Earle, B. A. Neville, M. B. Landrum, J. M. Souza, J. C. Weeks, S. D. Block, E. Grunfeld, and J. Z. Ayanian Evaluating claims-based indicators of the intensity of end-of-life cancer care Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2005; 17(6): 505 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A. DiFronzo, P. I. Tsai, J. M. Hwang, J. J. Lee, M. C. Ryoo, J. Rahimian, M. Tome, J. K. Takasugi, and P. I. Haigh Breast Conserving Surgery and Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using the MammoSite System: Initial Clinical Experience Arch Surg, August 1, 2005; 140(8): 787 - 794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. S. Akhtar and H. M. Nadrah Assessment of the quality of breast cancer care: a single institutional study from Saudi Arabia Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2005; 17(4): 301 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Malin and N. L. Keating The Cost-Quality Trade-Off: Need for Data Quality Standards for Studies That Impact Clinical Practice and Health Policy J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2005; 23(21): 4581 - 4584. [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Hebert-Croteau, J. Brisson, J. Latreille, M. Rivard, N. Abdelaziz, and G. Martin Compliance With Consensus Recommendations for Systemic Therapy Is Associated With Improved Survival of Women With Node-Negative Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., September 15, 2004; 22(18): 3685 - 3693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. C. Schneider, A. M. Epstein, J. L. Malin, K. L. Kahn, and E. J. Emanuel Developing a System to Assess the Quality of Cancer Care: ASCO's National Initiative on Cancer Care Quality J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2004; 22(15): 2985 - 2991. [Full Text] [PDF]