Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 20, Issue 24
(December), 2002: 4628-4635
© 2002 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Goserelin Versus Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil as Adjuvant Therapy in Premenopausal Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer: The Zoladex Early Breast Cancer Research Association Study
By W. Jonat,
M. Kaufmann,
W. Sauerbrei,
R. Blamey,
J. Cuzick,
M. Namer,
I. Fogelman,
J. C. de Haes,
A. de Matteis,
A. Stewart,
W. Eiermann,
I. Szakolczai,
M. Palmer,
M. Schumacher,
M. Geberth,
B. Lisboa
From the Klinik fur Gynakologie und Gerburtshilfe, Kiel, Universitatsklinik Frauenklinik, Frankfurt, Institute fur Medizinische Biometrie und Informatik and University Hospital, Freiburg, Frauenklinik vom Roten Kreuz, Munich, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, and Universitätskrankenhaus Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Guys and St Thomas Hospital, London, Christie Hospital, Manchester, and AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; Medicin Chef de Service du Centre-Antoine, Nice, France; University Hospital AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Naples, Italy; and National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
Address reprint requests to Walter Jonat, PhD, Klinik fur Gynakologie und Gerburtshilfe, University of Kiel, D-24105 Kiel, Germany; email: jonat{at}email.uni-kiel.de
PURPOSE: Current adjuvant therapies have improved survival for premenopausal patients with breast cancer but may have short-term toxic effects and long-term effects associated with premature menopause.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Zoladex Early Breast Cancer Research Association study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of goserelin (3.6 mg every 28 days for 2 years; n = 817) versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy (six 28-day cycles; n = 823) for adjuvant treatment in premenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer.
RESULTS: Analysis was performed when 684 events had been achieved, and the median follow-up was 6 years. A significant interaction between treatment and estrogen receptor (ER) status was found (P = .0016). In ER-positive patients (approximately 74%), goserelin was equivalent to CMF for disease-free survival (DFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.20). In ER-negative patients, goserelin was inferior to CMF for DFS (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.44). Amenorrhea occurred in more than 95% of goserelin patients by 6 months versus 58.6% of CMF patients. Menses returned in most goserelin patients after therapy stopped, whereas amenorrhea was generally permanent in CMF patients (22.6% v 76.9% amenorrheic at 3 years). Chemotherapy-related side effects such as nausea/vomiting, alopecia, and infection were higher with CMF than with goserelin during CMF treatment. Side effects related to estrogen suppression were initially higher with goserelin, but when goserelin treatment stopped, reduced to a level below that observed in the CMF group.
CONCLUSION: Goserelin offers an effective, well-tolerated alternative to CMF in premenopausal patients with ER-positive and node-positive early breast cancer.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. H. C. Bramwell, K. I. Pritchard, D. Tu, K. Tonkin, H. Vachhrajani, T. A. Vandenberg, J. Robert, A. Arnold, S. E. O'Reilly, B. Graham, et al.
A randomized placebo-controlled study of tamoxifen after adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal women with early breast cancer (National Cancer Institute of Canada--Clinical Trials Group Trial, MA.12)
Ann. Onc.,
July 23, 2009;
(2009)
mdp326v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Parton and I. E. Smith
Controversies in the Management of Patients With Breast Cancer: Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Women
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 10, 2008;
26(5):
745 - 752.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Cazzaniga, G. Mustacchi, P. Pronzato, A. De Matteis, F. Di Costanzo, I. Floriani, and On behalf of the NORA Study Group
Adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer: do the St Gallen recommendations influence clinical practice? Results from the NORA study
Ann. Onc.,
December 1, 2007;
18(12):
1976 - 1980.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Ferretti, A. Felici, P. Carlini, and F. Cognetti
Re: Polychemotherapy for Early Breast Cancer: Results From the International Adjuvant Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Randomized Trial
J Natl Cancer Inst,
September 19, 2007;
99(18):
1416 - 1416.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Schmid, M. Untch, V. Kosse, G. Bondar, L. Vassiljev, V. Tarutinov, U. Lehmann, L. Maubach, J. Meurer, D. Wallwiener, et al.
Leuprorelin Acetate Every-3-Months Depot Versus Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil As Adjuvant Treatment in Premenopausal Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer: The TABLE Study
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 20, 2007;
25(18):
2509 - 2515.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Walshe, N. Denduluri, and S. M. Swain
Amenorrhea in Premenopausal Women After Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 20, 2006;
24(36):
5769 - 5779.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Wolff and N. E. Davidson
Still Waiting After 110 Years: The Optimal Use of Ovarian Ablation As Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 1, 2006;
24(31):
4949 - 4951.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Ejlertsen, H. T. Mouridsen, M.-B. Jensen, N.-O. Bengtsson, J. Bergh, S. Cold, P. Edlund, M. Ewertz, P. W. de Graaf, C. Kamby, et al.
Similar Efficacy for Ovarian Ablation Compared With Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil: From a Randomized Comparison of Premenopausal Patients With Node-Positive, Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 1, 2006;
24(31):
4956 - 4962.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S Aebi and M Castiglione
The enigma of young age.
Ann. Onc.,
October 1, 2006;
17(10):
1475 - 1477.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Roche, P. Kerbrat, J. Bonneterre, P. Fargeot, P. Fumoleau, A. Monnier, P. Clavere, M.-J. Goudier, P. Chollet, J.-P. Guastalla, et al.
Complete hormonal blockade versus epirubicin-based chemotherapy in premenopausal, one to three node-positive, and hormone-receptor positive, early breast cancer patients: 7-year follow-up results of French Adjuvant Study Group 06 randomised trial
Ann. Onc.,
August 1, 2006;
17(8):
1221 - 1227.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Sonmezer and K. Oktay
Fertility preservation in young women undergoing breast cancer therapy.
Oncologist,
May 1, 2006;
11(5):
422 - 434.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
International Breast Cancer Study Group
Tamoxifen After Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Premenopausal Women With Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer: International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 13-93
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 20, 2006;
24(9):
1332 - 1341.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Elledge
Tales From a Targeted Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 20, 2006;
24(9):
1323 - 1325.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Colozza, E. de Azambuja, F. Cardoso, C. Bernard, and M. J. Piccart
Breast cancer: achievements in adjuvant systemic therapies in the pre-genomic era.
Oncologist,
February 1, 2006;
11(2):
111 - 125.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Del Mastro, T. Catzeddu, L. Boni, C. Bell, M. R. Sertoli, C. Bighin, M. Clavarezza, D. Testa, and M. Venturini
Prevention of chemotherapy-induced menopause by temporary ovarian suppression with goserelin in young, early breast cancer patients
Ann. Onc.,
January 1, 2006;
17(1):
74 - 78.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. R. Parulekar, A. G. Day, J. A. Ottaway, L. E. Shepherd, M. E. Trudeau, V. Bramwell, M. Levine, and K. I. Pritchard
Incidence and Prognostic Impact of Amenorrhea During Adjuvant Therapy in High-Risk Premenopausal Breast Cancer: Analysis of a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study--NCIC CTG MA.5
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 1, 2005;
23(25):
6002 - 6008.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. E. Krop and E. P. Winer
Ovarian Suppression for Breast Cancer: An Effective Treatment in Search of a Home
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 1, 2005;
23(25):
5869 - 5872.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Vanhuyse, C. Fournier, and J. Bonneterre
Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea: influence on disease-free survival and overall survival in receptor-positive premenopausal early breast cancer patients
Ann. Onc.,
August 1, 2005;
16(8):
1283 - 1288.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Dellapasqua, M. Colleoni, R. D. Gelber, and A. Goldhirsch
Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Premenopausal Women With Early Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 10, 2005;
23(8):
1736 - 1750.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Arriagada, M. G. Le, M. Spielmann, L. Mauriac, J. Bonneterre, M. Namer, T. Delozier, C. Hill, and T. Tursz
Randomized trial of adjuvant ovarian suppression in 926 premenopausal patients with early breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy
Ann. Onc.,
March 1, 2005;
16(3):
389 - 396.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Bonadonna, A. Moliterni, M. Zambetti, M. G. Daidone, S. Pilotti, L. Gianni, and P. Valagussa
30 years' follow up of randomised studies of adjuvant CMF in operable breast cancer: cohort study
BMJ,
January 29, 2005;
330(7485):
217.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Lutchman Singh, M. Davies, and R. Chatterjee
Fertility in female cancer survivors: pathophysiology, preservation and the role of ovarian reserve testing
Hum. Reprod. Update,
January 1, 2005;
11(1):
69 - 89.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G S Harrison, M E Wierman, T M Nett, and L M Glode
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone and its receptor in normal and malignant cells
Endocr. Relat. Cancer,
December 1, 2004;
11(4):
725 - 748.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L Jones and A. U Buzdar
A review of adjuvant hormonal therapy in breast cancer
Endocr. Relat. Cancer,
September 1, 2004;
11(3):
391 - 406.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Prowell and N. E. Davidson
What Is the Role of Ovarian Ablation in the Management of Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer Today?
Oncologist,
September 1, 2004;
9(5):
507 - 517.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Lipton
Toward New Horizons: The Future of Bisphosphonate Therapy
Oncologist,
September 1, 2004;
9(suppl_4):
38 - 47.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Pater and W. R. Parulekar
Ovarian Ablation as Adjuvant Therapy for Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer--Another Step Forward
J Natl Cancer Inst,
December 17, 2003;
95(24):
1811 - 1812.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Goodwin
Reversible Ovarian Ablation or Chemotherapy: Are We Ready for Quality of Life to Guide Adjuvant Treatment Decisions in Breast Cancer?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 15, 2003;
21(24):
4474 - 4475.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. de Haes, M. Olschewski, M. Kaufmann, M. Schumacher, W. Jonat, and W. Sauerbrei
Quality of Life in Goserelin-Treated Versus Cyclophosphamide + Methotrexate + Fluorouracil-Treated Premenopausal and Perimenopausal Patients With Node-Positive, Early Breast Cancer: The Zoladex Early Breast Cancer Research Association Trialists Group
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 15, 2003;
21(24):
4510 - 4516.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Goldhirsch, W. C. Wood, R. D. Gelber, A. S. Coates, B. Thurlimann, and H.-J. Senn
Meeting Highlights: Updated International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 1, 2003;
21(17):
3357 - 3365.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Samur and H. S. Bozcuk
Paradigm Shift in Adjuvant Treatment of Receptor Positive Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients? Not Yet!
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 15, 2003;
21(12):
2444 - 2444.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Malayeri
Can Endocrine Treatment for Hormone-Positive Premenopausal Women With Early Breast Cancer Replace Adjuvant Chemotherapy?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 15, 2003;
21(12):
2444 - 2445.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Jakesz
In Reply:
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 15, 2003;
21(12):
2446 - 2447.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Endocrine Adjuvant Therapy for Premenopausal Breast Cancer
Journal Watch (General),
January 24, 2003;
2003(124):
5 - 5.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. I. Pritchard
Adjuvant Therapy for Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer: Is It Time for Another Paradigm Shift?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 15, 2002;
20(24):
4611 - 4614.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|